How the Spiritual World Interpenetrates the Physical
GA 155
12 July 1914, Norrköping
Christ and the Human Soul I
LET me begin by extending to you my heartiest greeting. Friends in Norrköping have expressed the wish that on this occasion I should speak upon a theme concerning that Being Who, in the realm of Spiritual Science, is above all else near to us-the Christ Being. I have endeavored to comply with this wish by undertaking to speak about the coming to life, and the meaning, of the Christ Being in the human soul. We shall thereby have the opportunity of speaking of the most human and intimate significance of Christianity from the standpoint of Spiritual Science.
Let us consider the human soul. Speaking from the standpoint of Spiritual Science, we have a short word which, although it does not embrace all that is included in the expression ‘human soul,’ indicates that which for us earth-men fills and permeates the soul element to its furthest limits-the word ‘I.’ In so far as we are earth-men, our Ego being reaches as far as does our soul nature. By the name of the ‘I,’ or Ego being, we are reminded of one of the four most immediate principles of man. We speak, in the first instance, of four members or principles of the human being-the physical body, the etheric body, the astral body and the Ego. And we need only recall one thing in order to have the starting point for what we shall be considering in these lectures. It is only necessary to be reminded of the fact that we do not regard the laws and the living essence of the physical body of man as being capable of explanation by anything presented by our earthly environment. We know that when we want to understand the physical human body we must go back to the three preceding embodiments of our earth-the Old Saturn, Old Sun, and Old Moon periods. In a remote, primordial past, during Old Saturn, the germ of the physical body was already laid. During the Old Sun the foundation of the etheric body was laid; and during the Old Moon that of the astral body. In reality our Earth evolution in all its phases and in all its epochs is none other than that which gives to the Ego the possibility of the fulfillment of its whole being. It may be said that just as at the end of the Old Saturn period the physical body had reached a significant stage of its evolution, at the end of the Old Sun the etheric body had reached a significant stage of its evolution, the astral body at the end of the Old Moon, so at the end of the Earth period our Ego will have reached a significant point of its evolution. We know that our Ego develops through three soul members or principles, through the sentient soul, the intellectual or rational soul, and the conscious or spirit-soul. All the worlds that come within the range of these three soul members are also concerned with our Ego. In the course of our Earth evolution these three soul members first prepared for themselves the three external bodily members-the physical body, the etheric body and the astral body-through long Earth periods. In successive Post-Atlantean epochs of civilization the three soul principles developed further, and in future Earth periods they will again adapt themselves to the astral, etheric and physical bodies, so that the Earth can be prepared to pass over to the Jupiter evolution. If we take the expression comprehensively enough we might also speak of man's Earth evolution as his soul evolution. It may be said that when the Earth began, the soul element also began, in conformity with law, to bestir itself in man. At first it began to work on the external sheaths, then it developed its own being, and from then onwards begins again to work on the external sheaths in order that preparation may be made for the Jupiter evolution. We must keep before our mind's eye what man is meant to become in his soul during the Earth evolution. He is to become what may be designated by the expression ‘personality.’ This personality needs in the first place what may be called ‘the free-will.’ But it needs also, on the other side, the possibility of finding within itself the way to the Divine in the world. On the one side free-will, the possibility of choosing between the beautiful and the ugly, the good and the evil, the true and the false; and on the other side, the laying hold of the Divine so that the Divine penetrates into the soul and we know ourselves to be inwardly filled with it. Such are the two goals of man's soul evolution on the Earth. This human soul evolution on the Earth has received two religious gifts for the purposes of the attainment of these two goals. The one religious gift is destined to lay down in the human soul those forces which lead to freedom, to the capacity for differentiation between the true and the false, the beautiful and the ugly, the good and the bad. And on the other side another religious gift had to be given to man during his Earth evolution, in order that there might be laid in his soul that seed through which the soul can feel united to the Divine within itself. (‘Atoned’ is the rendering suggested by a translator.)
The first religious gift is that which we meet in the beginning of the Old Testament as the mighty picture of the Temptation and the Fall.
The second religious gift comes to us from all that ‘the Mystery of Golgotha’ signifies.
The Temptation and the Fall have to do with what planted freedom in man, the gift of being able to distinguish between good and bad, beautiful and ugly, true and false. The Mystery of Golgotha points to the possibility of man's soul finding once again the path to the Divine, of knowing that the Divine can flash up within it and penetrate it. These religious gifts include everything that is most important in the Earth evolution—everything proceeding from the Earth evolution that the soul can experience in its uttermost depths, that is associated most profoundly with the being and the development of the human soul. How far is there a connection between existence and development of the inner experience of the human soul?
I do not want to put these matters before you in an abstract way. I want to start from a perfectly concrete element, from a certain scene in the Mystery of Golgotha as it stands before our eyes in historical tradition and has impressed itself-and should indeed have impressed itself still more—in the hearts and souls of men. Let us assume that we have in Christ Jesus, that Being of Whom we have again and again spoken in the course of our lectures on Spiritual Science. Let us assume that in Christ Jesus we have before our spiritual eyes That Which must be manifest to us men as bearing the greatest importance for the whole universe. And then let us place in contrast to this feeling the outcry, the fury, of the enraged multitudes of Jerusalem at the time of the condemnation before the crucifixion. Let us place before our minds the fact that the High Court of Jerusalem for its own sake held it above all things necessary to question Christ Jesus as to His relationship with the Divine, as to whether He claimed to be the Son of God.
Let us recall to our spiritual eyes the fact that the High Court held such a claim to be the greatest blasphemy that Christ Jesus could have uttered. An historical scene is there before us—a scene wherein the people cry out and clamor for the death of Christ Jesus. And now let us try to picture to ourselves what this shouting and rage of the people signified historically. Let us ask: ‘What ought these people to have recognized in the Christ Jesus?’ They ought to have recognized that Being Who gives meaning and significance to earth life. They ought to have recognized that Being Who had to accomplish the deed without which earth humanity cannot find the way back to the Divine. They ought to have understood that humanity has no significance apart from this Being. Men would have to strike out from the evolution of the earth the word ‘man’ if they wished to strike out the Christ event. Now let us set before our minds that this multitude condemned and were enraged against the Being Who actually makes man upon this earth, and Who is destined to give to the earth its goal and purpose. What lies in this? Surely this, that in those who in Jerusalem at that time were the representatives of human knowledge concerning the true being of man, the knowledge of man was obscured. They had no knowledge of what man is, what his mission on the earth is to be. We are told nothing less than that humanity had reached a point where it had lost itself, where it had condemned That Which gives to the earth evolution its purpose and significance. And out of the cries of the enraged multitude could be heard, not the words of wisdom, but of folly: ‘We do not wish to be men, rather do we wish to cast away from us that which gives us any further meaning as men.’
When we reflect on all this, the relation of man to sin and guilt, in the sense of Pauline Christianity, assumes a different aspect. Man, in the course of his evolution was able to fall into sin which he could not of himself wash away; that is what St. Paul says. And in order for it to be possible for man to be cleansed of sin and debt, Christ had to come to the Earth. That is St. Paul's view. If this view requires any evidence, it is there in the fury and the clamoring of those who cried ‘Crucify Him!’ For this cry implies that the people did not know what they themselves were to be on the Earth; they did not know that it was the aim of their earlier evolution to veil their being with darkness. Here we come to what may be spoken of as the attitude of preparation of the human soul for the Christ Being. This attitude of preparation may be described as follows: Through what it is able to experience within itself, the soul feels, even though it may not be able to express it in words: ‘Since the very beginning of the Earth I have developed in such a way that through what I possess in my own being I cannot fulfill the aim of my evolution. Where is there anything to which I can cling, which I can take into myself and with it reach my goal in evolution?’ To feel as if the human being extends far beyond anything that the soul can achieve through its own strength won during its evolution on the Earth hitherto—such is the Christian attitude or mood of preparation. And when the soul finds that which it must recognize as essentially bound up with its being—but for the attainment of which it could not find the power within itself—when the soul finds that which bestows this power—it finds Christ. The soul then develops. its connection with the Christ, saying to itself: ‘At the very beginning of the Earth a living nature was predestined for me: during the course of Earth evolution darkness has descended over this living nature and when I now look into this darkness I lack the power whereby I may bring it to fulfillment, but I turn my spiritual gaze upon the Christ Who gives me the power.’ The human soul feels the approach of Christ and stands as if in a direct personal relationship to Him. The soul seeks Christ and knows that it cannot find Him if He does not give Himself to humanity through human evolution, if He does not approach from the beyond.
There is a fairly well-known Christian Church Father who was not afraid to speak of the Greek philosophers, Herakleitos, Socrates and Plato, as Christians who lived before the founding of Christianity. Why does he do this? St. Augustine himself said: ‘All religions have contained something of the Truth, and the element of Truth in all religions is what is Christian in them, before there was Christianity in name.’ St. Augustine dares to say that. Nowadays many a man would be regarded as a heretic if he were to say a similar thing within certain Christian bodies.
We most readily arrive at an understanding of what this Church Father wished to convey when he called the old Greek philosophers Christians, by endeavoring to transport ourselves into the feeling of those souls who in the first post Christian centuries tried to determine their personal relationship to the Christ. These souls did not think of Christ as having had no relation to the Earth evolution before the Mystery of Golgotha. The Christ has always had something to do with the evolution of the Earth. Through the Mystery of Golgotha, however, His task, His mission in the Earth evolution, was changed from what it was before. It is not Christian to seek Christ in the evolution of the Earth only since the Mystery of Golgotha. True Christians know that Christ had always been connected with the evolution of the Earth.
Let us now turn to the Jewish people. Did the Jews know Christ? I am not speaking of whether the Jewish people knew the name of Christ or whether those who really understand Christianity are justified in saying: ‘Judaism had Christ: Judaism knew Christ.’ It is possible to have some person or other near one, and to see his external form without recognizing his essential being, or being able to place a right value upon him, because one has not risen to real knowledge of him. In the true Christian sense ancient Judaism had Christ, only it did not recognize Him in His true Being. Is it Christian to speak in this way? It is Christian in as true a sense as it is Pauline. Where was Christ for ancient Judaism? It is said in the Old Testament that when Moses led the Jews into the wilderness, a Pillar of Cloud went before them by day and a Pillar of Fire by night. It is said that the Jews passed through the sea, that the sea parted in order that they might pass through; but that behind them the Egyptians were drowned, for the sea closed in on them. It is also said that the Jews murmured, but that at the command of God, Moses was able to go to a rock and to strike it with his staff so that water poured forth for the Jews to drink. Moses led the Jews, he himself being led by God. Who was the God of Moses? We will in the first instance allow Paul to answer. We read in the First Epistle to the Corinthians (x. 1-4): ‘Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant how that all our fathers were under the cloud (he means the pillar of fire) and all passed through the sea; and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; and did all eat the same spiritual meat and did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of the spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ.’ Thus according to Paul, Who was it who led the Jews and who spoke with Moses? Who was it who had allowed water to flow out of the rock and who turned away the sea from the path of the Jews? Only those who wished to declare that Paul was no Christian would dare pronounce it unchristian to see Christ in the guiding God of the Old Testament, in the Lord of Moses.
In the Old Testament there is a passage which must, I think, present great difficulties for all who reflect more deeply. It is a passage to which anyone who does not read the Old Testament thoughtlessly, but who wants to understand its connections, will return again and again. ‘What may this passage mean?’ he asks himself. The passage is as follows: ‘Then Moses raised his hand, and struck the Rock with the staff twice; thereupon much water came forth, and the congregation drank, and their cattle. But the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron: Because ye have not believed in Me to sanctify Me before the children of Israel, ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I will give unto them.’ Take this passage in its context in the Old Testament: When the people murmured, the Lord commanded Moses to strike the rock with a staff: Moses struck with his staff on the rock, and water flowed out; everything that the Lord commanded took place through Moses and Aaron, and directly after this, we are told that the Lord reproved Moses—if it is a reproof—for not having believed in Him. What does it mean? Take all the commentaries on this passage, and try to understand the passage by means of what has been written in them. One understands it as one understands a great deal in the Bible—that is to say, really not at all, for behind this passage a mighty mystery is hidden. What is hidden in this passage is this: He Who led Moses, Who appeared to Moses in the burning bush, He Who led the people through the Wilderness and caused water to flow out of the Rock, He was the Lord Christ! But the time was not yet come; Moses himself did not recognize Him; Moses thought He was another. That is what is meant by Moses not having believed in Him Who had commanded him to strike the Rock with his staff.
How did the Lord Christ appear to the Jewish People? We are told that by day it was in a Pillar of Cloud, and by night it was in a Pillar of Fire—and by His dividing the waters for their safety ... and many other things which we can read in the Old Testament. In phenomena of cloud and fire He appeared and was active, but never did it occur to the ancient Jews: That Which appeared in the Pillar of Cloud and in the Pillar of Fire, That Which worked wonders such as the parting of the waters, appears in its purest original form in the human soul. Why did this never occur to the ancient Jews? Because, owing to the course taken by human evolution, the soul of man had lost the power to feel its deepest being within itself. Thus the Jewish soul could look into Nature, it could allow the glory of the phenomena of the elements to work upon it; everywhere it could divine the existence of its God and Lord; but directly, within itself as it was, it could not find Him.
There in the Old Testament we have the Christ. There He worked, but men did not recognize Him. How did the Christ work? Do we not see how He worked, when we read through the Old Testament? The most significant thing Moses had to impart to his people through the mouth of Jehovah was the Ten Commandments. He had received them out of the power of the elements from which Jehovah spoke to him. Moses did not descend into the depths of his own soul; he did not ask in lonely meditation: ‘How does God speak in my own heart?’ He went up into the mountain, and through the power of the elements the Divine Will revealed itself to him. Volition, or Will, is the fundamental character of the Old Testament—this fundamental character is often called that of Law. Will works through the evolution of man, and is expressed in the Decalogue, in the Ten Commandments. The God proclaimed His Will to man through the elements. Will holds sway in the Earth evolution. That is, really, the purport of the Old Testament, and the Old Testament, in accordance with its whole purport, calls for man's subjection to this Will.
If we hold before our souls what we have just been considering, we can express the result in the words: The Will of the Lord was given to men; but men did not know the Lord: they knew not the Divine in such a way as to connect it with their own human soul.
Now let us turn from the Jews to the heathen. The heathen, had they Christ? Is it Christian to say of the heathen that they also had Christ? The heathen had their Mysteries. Those initiated in the Mysteries were brought to the point where their soul passed out of their bodies; the tie connecting body and soul was loosened; and when the soul was outside the body, the soul perceived the mysteries of being in the spiritual world. Much was connected with these Mysteries; much varied knowledge came to the candidates for initiation in the Mysteries. But when we investigate what was the highest that the disciple of the Mysteries could receive into himself, we find that it consisted in the fact that outside his body he was placed before the Christ. As Moses was placed before Christ, so, in the Mysteries was the disciple placed with his soul, outside his body, before Christ. Christ was there for the heathen also, but for them He was there only in the Mysteries. He revealed Himself to them only when the soul was out of the body. Christ was there for the heathen, even if among the heathen there was as little recognition of this Being as Christ, as there was among the Jews of that Being of Whom we have just spoken and before Whom the Mystery-Disciples were placed. The Mysteries were instituted for the heathen. Those who were fit and ready were admitted into the Mysteries. Through these Mysteries Christ worked upon the heathen world. Why did He work thus? Because the soul of man, in its development since the beginning of the earth, had lost its inherent power to find its true being through itself. This true being had to reveal itself to the soul of man when unhampered by the ties of human nature, that is to say when it was not bound up with the body. Hence Christ had to lead men through their being divested of their human nature in the Mysteries. Christ was there for the heathen too I He was their Leader in the Mysteries. For never could man have said: ‘When I develop my own powers, then I can find the meaning and purport of the earth.’ This meaning was lost, obscured in darkness. The forces of the human soul had been pressed down into regions too deep for the soul of itself, through its own powers, to have been able to realize the meaning of the earth.
When we allow that, which was given in the heathen Mysteries to the disciples and candidates for initiation, to work upon us, it is Wisdom. To the Jews was given WILL, through the Laws; to the disciples of the heathen Mysteries was given WISDOM. But if we look at what characterizes this heathen Wisdom, may we not express it in the words: If he did not go out of his body when he was a pupil of the Mysteries, the Earth-man could not recognize his God as such. As little through Wisdom as through Will could the Divinity reveal Himself to man. We find words that sound most wonderfully through Greek Antiquity, like a mighty demand upon humanity. At the entrance to the abode of the Mysteries of Apollo stood the words, ‘Man, know thyself!’ What are we told by the fact that these words, ‘Man, know thyself,’ stood before the abode of the Mysteries, like a demand upon man? We are told that when man remains what he has become since the beginning of the Earth, nowhere outside can he fulfill the commandment ‘Know thyself.’ He must become something more than man; he must loosen in the Mysteries the ties which bind the soul to the body, if he is to know himself. These words, standing like a mighty demand before the abode of the Mysteries of Apollo, point to the fact that darkness had fallen upon humanity—in other words that God could be reached through Wisdom as little as He could directly reveal Himself as Will.
In the same sense as the individual human soul feels that it cannot bring forth within itself the forces which impart to it the purport of the Earth, so we see the human soul at such a stage of development among the Jews that even Moses himself, their leader, did not recognize Who was leading him. Among the heathen we see that the demand ‘Know thyself’ could be fulfilled only in the Mysteries, because man, as he had developed in the course of the evolution of the Earth, was unable with his connection of body and soul to unfold the power whereby he could know himself. The words, ‘Not through Will and not through Wisdom is God to be known,’ sound to us from those ages. Through what, then, was God to be known?
We have often characterized the essential nature of the point of time when Christ entered into the evolution of earth-humanity. Let us now consider exactly what it meant when it is said that a certain darkness of the soul of man had set in, that the Divine could be revealed neither through Will nor through Wisdom. What is the real meaning of this?
People speak of so many relationships between the human and the Divine. They often speak of the relationship between the human and the Divine and of the meaning which the human has within the Divine, in such a way that it is impossible to differentiate between the relation of the human to the Divine, or of any other earthly thing to the Divine. To-day we find again and again that philosophers want to rise to the Divine through pure philosophy. But, through pure philosophy one cannot rise to the Divine. Certainly by means of it man does come to feel that he is bound up with the universe, and to know that the human being must, in some way or other, be bound up with the universe at Death; but how and in what manner he is thus connected with the universe man cannot know through pure philosophy. Why not? If you take the whole meaning of what we have considered to-day, you will be able to say to yourselves:
That which is first revealed to the soul of the Earth-man between birth and death is too weak to perceive anything that transcends the earthly that leads to the Divine-Spiritual. In order to make this quite clear to ourselves let us investigate the meaning of immortality.
In our day, many people have no longer any knowledge of the real meaning of human immortality. Many to-day speak of immortality when they can merely admit that the being of the human soul passes through the gates of death, and then finds some place or other in the Universal All. But every creature does that; what is united into the crystal passes over into the Universal All when the crystal is dissolved; the plant that fades passes into the Universal All. For man the thing is different. Immortality has only a meaning for man when he can carry his consciousness through the gates of death. Picture to yourselves an immortal human soul which was unconscious after death; such immortality would have absolutely no meaning at all. The human soul must carry its consciousness through the gates of death if it is to speak of its immortality. Because of the way in which the soul is united to the body, it cannot find anything in itself of which it can say, ‘I carry that consciously through death,’ for the consciousness of man is enclosed between birth and death; it reaches only as far as death; at first the consciousness possessed by the human soul extends only as far as death. Into this consciousness there shines the Divine Will, for example in the Ten Commandments. Read in the Book of Job as to whether this illumination could stimulate man's consciousness to such strength that it might say to itself: ‘I pass as a conscious being through the gates of death.’ What an intense interest there is for us in these words spoken to Job: ‘Submit thyself to God and die!’ We know that the man was uncertain as to whether he would pass through the gates of death with consciousness. And let us set beside this the Greek saying which gives expression to the dread felt by the Greek in the face of death: ‘Better a beggar in the upper world than a king in the realm of shades.’ Here we have the testimony from heathenism also to the uncertainty felt by man concerning his immortality. And how uncertain many people are even to-day. All those people who say that man, when he goes through the gates of death, passes into the Universal All and is united with some Universal Being or other, take no heed of what the soul must ascribe to itself if it is to speak of its immortality.
We need only pronounce one word, and we shall recognize the position that man must take up with regard to his immortality—this is the word Love. All that we have said concerning the word Immortality we can now connect with what Love designates. Love is nothing we appropriate to ourselves through the Will; Love is nothing that we appropriate to ourselves through Wisdom; Love dwells in the region of the feelings, and we know that we could not be the ideal human soul, if that human soul could not be filled with love. When we penetrate into the nature of the soul, we realize that our human soul would no longer be a human soul if it could not love. But now, let us suppose that we were to pass through the gates of death in such a way that our human individuality was lost, and that we were to be united with some Universal Divinity. We should then be within this Divinity; we should belong to It. We could no longer love the Godhead; we should be in Him. Love would have no meaning if we were in the Godhead. If we could not carry our individuality through death, we should in death have to lose love, for in the moment that individuality ceased, love would cease. One being can only love another that is separate from itself; if we carry our Love of God through death, we must carry with us through death that which kindles Love within us.
If the meaning of the earth is to be brought to man, information concerning his immortality must be given him in such a way that his nature may be thought of as inseparable from Love. Neither Will nor Wisdom can give to man what he needs; only Love can give man what he needs. What was it then that became darkened in the course of man's evolutionary path over the Earth? Let us take the Jews, or the Heathen: the consciousness beyond death had become obscure, dark. Between birth and death-consciousness; beyond death and beyond birth—darkness; nothing remained of the consciousness within the earth-body—‘Know thyself’—at the entrance of the Greek Mysteries, the most holy demand of the Greek sanctuary upon mankind. Man could only answer: ‘If I remain bound to my body with my soul as when an earth-man, I cannot recognize myself in that individuality which can love beyond death. I cannot do it.’ The knowledge that man can love as individuality beyond death—that was what had become lost for man. Death is not the cessation of the physical body. Only a materialist can say that. Suppose that in every hour that he lived in his body, man's consciousness were such that he knew as certainly what lies beyond death as he knows to-day that the sun will rise on the morrow and take its journey across the heavens. Then death would have no sting for him, death would not be that which we call death; man would know in the body that death is only a phenomenon leading from one form to another. Paul did not understand by ‘death’ the cessation of the physical body; by ‘death’ he understood the fact that consciousness only extends as far as death, and that man, in so far as he was united with the body in the existence of that period, could, within his body, extend his consciousness only as far as death. Wherever Paul speaks of death we might add: ‘Lack of consciousness beyond death.’
What gave to man the Mystery of Golgotha? Is it a number of natural phenomena, a pillar of cloud, a pillar of fire that stands before humanity with the Mystery of Golgotha? No! A man stands before men—Christ Jesus. With the Mystery of Golgotha did anything out of mysterious nature take place—did a sea divide so that the people of God could go through? No! A man stood before men, Who made the lame to walk and the blind to see. That proceeded from a man.
The Jew had had to look into Nature when he wanted to see Him Whom he called his Divine Lord. Now it was a man Who could be seen. Of a man it could be said that He had God dwelling in Him. The heathen had to be initiated; his soul had to be withdrawn from his body in order that he might stand before the Humanity which is the Christ. On the earth he had been unable to divine the Christ; he could only know that the Christ was outside the earth. But He Who had been outside the earth came upon the earth, took on a human body. In Christ Jesus there stood as man before men That Being Who formerly had stood in the Mysteries before the soul that was liberated from the body. And what came to pass through this? In this the beginning was made, whereby the powers that man had lost since the beginning of the Earth in the course of the earth-evolution—the powers through which his immortality was assured to him—were to come again to him through the Mystery of Golgotha. In the overcoming of Death on Golgotha the forces originated which could rekindle the powers which had been lost. And the path of man through the earth-evolution will henceforth be that by taking the Christ more and more into himself he will discover that within himself which can love beyond death—that is to say, he can stand before his God as an immortal individuality. Therefore only since the Mystery of Golgotha, has the saying become true: ‘Love God above all, and thy neighbor as thyself.’
Will was given from the burning thorn bush; Will was given through the Ten Commandments. Wisdom was given through the Mysteries. But Love was given when God became man in Christ Jesus. And the guarantee that we can love beyond death, that by means of the powers won back for our souls a Society of Love exists between God and man, and love of all men for one another—the guarantee for that proceeds from the Mystery of Golgotha. In the Mystery of Golgotha the human soul has found what man had lost from the primal beginnings of the earth, in that his forces had become ever weaker and weaker.
Three forces in three members of the soul: Will, Wisdom, Love I In this Love the soul experiences its relation to Christ.
I wanted to bring these things before you from a certain angle. What may have seemed aphoristic in the explanations given to-day will find its context later on. But I think we can inscribe deeply within our souls, that progress in the knowledge of Christ is a real gain for the human soul, and that when we consider the relationship of the human soul to Christ, it again becomes clear to us how before the Mystery of Golgotha there was a sheath, as it were, between the human soul and Christ; how this sheath was broken by the Mystery of Golgotha, and how we can say with truth: ‘Through the Mystery of Golgotha a Cosmic Being flowed into the Earth-life, a Super-earthly Being united Himself with the Earth.’
As to what the human soul can experience in itself with its Christ, we shall speak of together during the next few days. We shall speak in the following lectures of all that the human soul, with Christ, can experience within itself.
Erster Vortrag
Die Freunde aus Norrköping haben gewünscht, daß ich bei dieser Anwesenheit, bei deren Beginn ich Sie, meine lieben Freunde, herzlichst begrüße, über ein "Thema spreche, das in Beziehung steht zu jener Wesenheit, die uns ja auf dem Gebiete der Geisteswissenschaft vor allen Dingen naheliegt und nahegeht: zur Wesenheit des Christus. Und ich habe versucht, diesem Wunsche dadurch nachzukommen, daß ich mir vorgenommen habe, zu sprechen über das Aufleben und die Bedeutung dieses Auflebens der Christus-Wesenheit in der menschlichen Seele. Wir werden gerade bei diesem Thema Gelegenheit haben, von dem geisteswissenschaftlichen Gesichtspunkte aus gewissermaßen über die menschlichste, über die uns am meisten zu Herzen gehende Bedeutung des Christentums zu sprechen.
Diese menschliche Seele! Wir haben, insofern wir geisteswissenschaftlich sprechen, ein kurzes Wort, welches zwar nicht alles umfaßt, was menschliche Seele uns bedeutet, welches aber doch auf dasjenige hindeutet, was gewissermaßen für uns Erdenmenschen das Seelische in seinen weiten Grenzen ausfüllt und durchdringt — wir haben das kurze Wort Ich. Unsere Ich-Wesenheit geht so weit, insofern wir Erdenmenschen sind, als unser Seelisches. Indem wir nun den Namen der Ich-Wesenheit aussprechen, erinnern wir uns ja sogleich, daß wir mit dieser Ich-Wesenheit eines der vier uns zunächstliegenden Glieder der Menschenwesenheit bezeichnen. Wir sprechen von vier Gliedern der Menschenwesenheit zunächst: von dem physischen Leibe, dem Ätherleibe, dem Astralleibe und dem Ich. Und wir brauchen uns nur einiges ins Gedächtnis zu rufen, um Ausgangspunkte zu gewinnen für die Betrachtung, die wir in diesen Tagen anstellen wollen. Wir brauchen uns nur ins Gedächtnis zu rufen, daß wir des Menschen physischen Leib nicht so ansehen, als ob für uns seine Gesetze — das Wesenhafte, das er enthält — zu erkennen wären aus demjenigen, was unsere Erdenumgebung zunächst darbietet. Wir wissen, daß wir, wenn wir den physischen Menschenleib verstehen wollen, zurückgehen müssen zu drei vorhergehenden Verkörperungen unserer Erde, zur Saturn-, Sonnen- und Mondenverkörperung; wir wissen, daß in urferner Vergangenheit, während der Saturnverkörperung unserer Erde, der physische Leib bereits seine Veranlagung gewonnen hat; wir wissen dann, daß während der Sonnenverkörperung der Ätherleib seine Veranlagung erfahren hat, und während der Mondenverkörperung der Astralleib. Und was ist im Grunde genommen unsere Erdenentwickelung anderes, als in allen ihren Phasen, in allen ihren Epochen dasjenige, was dem Ich die Möglichkeit gibt, sich in allen seinen Weiten zu verwirklichen!
Wir können sagen: So wie der physische Leib auf einer gewissen, für ihn bedeutungsvollen Stufe seiner Entwickelung angelangt war am Ende der Saturnentwickelung, wie der Ätherleib ebenso auf einer für ihn bedeutungsvollen Stufe angelangt war am Ende der Sonnenentwickelung, und der Astralleib ebenso am Ende der Mondenentwickelung, so wird unser Ich am Ende der Erdenentwickelung an einem bedeutungsvollen Punkte seiner Entwickelung angelangt sein. Und wir sprechen davon, daß unser Ich sich hindurchentwickelt durch drei seelische Glieder: durch die Empfindungsseele, die Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele und die Bewußtseinsseele. Alle die Welten, die umschlossen sind von diesen drei Seelengliedern, haben auch mit unserem Ich etwas zu tun. Diese drei Seelenglieder sind es, welche im Verlauf unserer Erdenentwickelung sich zuerst die drei äußeren leiblichen Glieder, den physischen Leib, den Ätherleib und den Astralleib zubereitet haben, durch lange Erdenzeiten hindurch zubereitet haben, und die nun in aufeinanderfolgenden Kulturepochen der nachatlantischen Zeit in gewisser Weise sich weiterentwickeln, die in zukünftigen Erdenzeiten sich wieder anpassen werden an Astralleib, Ärherleib und physischen Leib, so daß die Erde sich bereiten kann, zur Jupiterentwickelung hinüberzugehen.
Wir könnten geradezu auch, wenn wir den Ausdruck umfassend genug nehmen, die Erdenentwickelung des Menschen seine Seelenentwickelung nennen. Man könnte sagen: Als die Erde begonnen hat, da begann auch im Menschen das Seelische gesetzmäßig sich zu regen. Es arbeitete zunächst an den äußeren Hüllen, dann arbeitete es sich selbst heraus und bereitet sich nunmehr vor, wiederum an den äußeren Hüllen zu arbeiten, damit die Jupiterentwickelung vorbereitet werden könne. Nun müssen wir uns vor Augen halten, was der Mensch während der Erdenentwickelung in seiner Seele werden soll. Er soll werden dasjenige, was man bezeichnen könnte mit dem Ausdruck Persönlichkeit. Diese Persönlichkeit bedarf erstens dessen, was man nennen kann den freien Willen; aber sie bedarf auf der anderen Seite auch der Möglichkeit, in sich den Weg zu finden zu dem Göttlichen in der Welt. Freier Wille auf der einen Seite, die Möglichkeit zu wählen zwischen dem Guten und dem Bösen, zwischen dem Schönen und dem Häßlichen, dem Wahren und dem Falschen, dieser freie Wille auf der einen Seite, und die Erfassung des Göttlichen so, daß es in unsere Seele eindringt und wir uns innerlich erfüllt wissen, frei erfüllt wissen mit dem Göttlichen auf der andern Seite, das sind die zwei Zielpunkte der menschlichen Seelenentwickelung auf Erden.
Diese menschliche Seelenentwickelung auf Erden hat nun, man möchte sagen, zu diesen zwei Zielpunkten zwei religiöse Gaben empfangen. Die eine religiöse Gabe ist dazu bestimmt, in die menschliche Seele hineinzuverlegen die Kräfte, die zur Freiheit, zur Unterscheidung von Wahr und Falsch, von Schön und Häßlich, von Gut und Böse führen. Und auf der anderen Seite hat eine andere religiöse Gabe dem Menschen werden müssen während seiner Erdenentwickelung, um in die Seele hineinzulegen jenen Keim, durch den die Seele das Göttliche in sich, mit sich vereinigt fühlen kann.
Die erste religiöse Gabe ist dasjenige, was uns im Beginn des alten Testamentes als das grandiose Bild von dem Sündenfall, von der Versuchung, entgegentritt. Die zweite religiöse Gabe ist das, was uns entgegentritt in alledem, was wir umschließen mit dem Wort Mysterium von Golgatha.
Ebenso wie Sündenfall und Versuchung es zu tun haben mit dem, was in den Menschen hineinpflanzte Freiheit, Unterscheidungsgabe zwischen Gut und Böse, Schön und Häßlich, Wahr und Falsch, so hat das Mysterium von Golgatha es damit zu tun, daß die Seele des Menschen den Weg wiederfinden könne zu dem Göttlichen, daß sie wissen könne: in ihr kann das Göttliche leuchten, es kann das Göttliche sie durchdringen. Gewissermaßen ist in diese zwei religiösen Gaben eingeschlossen alles Wichtigste der Erdenevolution, alles dasjenige aus der Erdenevolution heraus, was zu tun hat mit dem, was die Seele in ihren tiefsten Tiefen erleben kann, was zusammenhängt im tiefsten mit Wesen und Werden der Menschenseele.
Inwiefern hängt dasjenige, was mit diesen beiden religiösen Gaben bezeichnet worden ist, und Wesen und Werden der Menschenseele, inneres Erleben der Menschenseele zusammen ?
Nun, ich möchte nicht bloß abstrakt Ihnen schildern, was ich zu sagen habe, ich möchte ausgehen zunächst von einer ganz konkreten Betrachtung. Ausgehen möchte ich davon, wie uns eine gewisse Szene des Mysteriums von Golgatha in geschichtlicher Überlieferung vor Augen steht, so wie sie sich eingeprägt hat und noch viel mehr einprägen sollte in die Herzen und in die Seelen der Menschen. Setzen wir einen Augenblick voraus, daß wir vor uns haben in dem Christus Jesus diejenige Wesenheit, die wir öfter im Verlauf unserer geisteswissenschaftlichen Betrachtungen besprochen und charakterisiert haben; setzen wir voraus, daß wir in dem Christus Jesus dasjenige vor dem geistigen Auge haben, was uns Menschen im ganzen Weltenall als das Wichtigste erscheinen muß. Und dann stellen wir gegenüber dieser Empfindung, diesem Gefühl, das Schreien, das Wüten der aufgeregten Menge von Jerusalem vor der Kreuzigung, bei der Verurteilung. Stellen wir uns vor das geistige Auge die Tatsache, daß der Hohe Rat in Jerusalem vor allen Dingen es für sehr wichtig hält, an den Christus Jesus die Frage zu stellen nach dem, wie er es mit dem Göttlichen halte, ob er sich bekenne als den Sohn des Göttlichen. Und fassen wir ins geistige Auge, daß der Hohe Rat dieses für die größte Lästerung hält, die der Christus Jesus hat aussprechen können. Halten wir uns weiter vor Augen, daß eine Szene vor uns steht, geschichtlich, in der das Volk schreit und wütet nach dem Tode des Christus Jesus. Und versuchen wir nun einmal, uns zu vergegenwärtigen, was dieses Schreien und Wüten des Volkes historisch eigentlich bedeutet. Fragen wir uns einmal: Was hätte denn dieses Volk erkennen sollen in dem Christus Jesus ?
Erkennen hätte es sollen in dem Christus Jesus diejenige Wesenheit, die dem Erdenleben Sinn und Bedeutung gibt. Erkennen hätte es sollen in dem Christus Jesus diejenige Wesenheit, die zu vollbringen hat die Tat, ohne welche die Erdenmenschheit den Weg zum Göttlichen nicht wiederfinden kann. Erkennen hätte es sollen, daß der Sinn des Erdenmenschen nicht da ist ohne diese Wesenheit. Ausstreichen hätten die Menschen müssen von der Erdenentwickelung das Wort «Mensch», wenn sie hätten ausstreichen wollen das Christus-Ereignis.
Nun stellen wir uns vor, daß diese Menge diejenige Wesenheit verurteilt, über diejenige Wesenheit wütet, welche den Menschen auf Erden eigentlich zum Menschen macht, welche der Erde ihr Ziel und ihren Sinn geben soll. Was liegt darinnen? Liegt darinnen nicht, daß die Menschheit in ihrer Erdenentwickelung damals angekommen war an einem Punkt, gegenüber dem man sagen kann: In denjenigen, die dazumal in Jerusalem die Vertretung der menschlichen Erkenntnis über das wahre Wesen der Menschen hatten, war verdunkelt die Erkenntnis des Menschen, die wußten nicht, was der Mensch ist, was der Mensch soll auf der Erde. Nichts Geringeres ist uns gesagt, als daß die Menschheit an einem Punkt angekommen war, wo sie sich selbst verloren hatte, wo sie dasjenige verurteilte, was ihr Sinn und Bedeutung in der Erdenentwickelung gibt. Und aus dem Schreien der aufgeregten Menge könnte man heraushören das, was allerdings nicht aus Weisheit, sondern aus Torheit gesprochen ist: Wir wollen nicht mehr Mensch sein, wir wollen von uns stoßen, was uns weiter Sinn gibt als Menschen.
Wenn man dies alles so bedenkt, dann steht uns doch in einer etwas anderen Weise als sonst vor dem geistigen Auge das, was man zum Beispiel im Sinne des paulinischen Christentums «das Verhältnis des Menschen zur Sünde und zur Schuld» nennt. Daß der Mensch im Verlauf seiner Entwickelung in Sünde und Schuld verfallen konnte, die er nicht selbst von sich wiederum wegwaschen konnte, das meint ja Paulus. Und daß es dem Menschen möglich werde, Sünde und Schuld und damit alles dasjenige, was für ihn mit Sünde und Schuld zusammenhängt, von sich abzuwaschen, dazu mußte der Christus auf die Erde kommen. Das ist des Paulus Meinung. Und man möchte sagen: Braucht diese Meinung irgendeinen wirklichen Beleg, so ist dieser Beleg gegeben in dem Wüten und Schreien derjenigen, die da rufen: «Kreuziget ihn!» Denn in diesem Rufe liegt, daß die Menschen nicht wußten, was sie selbst auf Erden zu bedeuten haben, daß ihre frühere Entwickelung dahin gezielt war, Finsternis zu verbreiten über ihr Wesen.
Damit sind wir aber auch bei dem angekommen, was man nennen könnte «die vorbereitende Stimmung der Menschenseele zu der Christus-Wesenheit». Diese vorbereitende Stimmung der Menschenseele zu der Christus-Wesenheit, sie besteht darinnen, daß die Seele — wenn sie das auch nicht mit klaren Worten aussprechen kann — fühlt durch das, was sie in sich erleben kann: Ich habe mich so entwickelt seit Erdenanbeginn, daß ich durch das, was ich in mir selbst habe, mein Entwickelungsziel nicht erreichen kann. Wo ist etwas, woran ich mich klammern kann, was ich in mich hereinnehmen kann, damit ich mein Entwickelungsziel erreiche? Sich so fühlen, als ob das menschliche Wesen weit über das hinausginge, was die Seele durch ihre Kraft zunächst wegen ihrer bisherigen Erdenentwickelung erreichen kann, das ist die vorbereitende christliche Stimmung. Und wenn dann die Seele das findet, was sie mit ihrer Wesenheit notwendig verbunden wissen muß, wozu sie aber die Kraft nicht in sich selbst findet, wenn dann die Seele das findet, was ihr diese Kräfte gibt, dann ist dieses Gefundene der Christus. Dann entwickelt die Seele ihr Verhältnis zu dem Christus, dann steht die Seele auf der einen Seite so, daß sie sich sagt: Im Erdenanbeginn ist mir eine Wesenheit vorherbestimmt gewesen, die in mir verfinstert worden ist im Laufe der Erdenentwickelung, und blicke ich jetzt in diese verfinsterte Seele, so fehlen mir die Kräfte, diese Wesenheit zu verwirklichen. Aber ich wende den geistigen Blick hin zu dem Christus, der gibt mir diese Kräfte. — Da steht denn die menschliche Seele, indem sie einerseits in der geschilderten Art dasteht, und auf der anderen Seite den Christus an sich herankommen fühlt, wie in einem unmittelbaren persönlichen Verhältnis zu dem Christus. Da sucht sie den Christus und weiß, daß sie ihn nicht finden kann, wenn er sich nicht durch die menschliche Entwickelung der Menschheit selbst gibt, wenn er nicht von außen an sie herankommt.
Es gibt einen christlichen Kirchenvater, der ziemlich allgemein anerkannt ist, und der nicht davor zurückscheute, Heraklit, den griechischen Philosophen, Sokrates und Plato Christen zu nennen, Christen, die es waren, bevor das Christentum begründet worden ist. Warum tut das dieser Kirchenvater? Ja, dasjenige, was sich heute Konfession nennt, verdunkelt so manches auch von dem, was ursprünglich leuchtende christliche Lehren waren. Hat doch Augustinus selbst gesagt: «In allen Religionen war etwas Wahres, und dasjenige, was in allen Religionen wahr war, das war das Christliche in ihnen, bevor es ein Christentum dem Namen nach gab.» Augustinus durfte das noch sagen. Heute würde mancher verketzert, der innerhalb einer christlichen Konfession das gleiche sagen würde.
Wir kommen am schnellsten zum Verständnis dessen, was dieser Kirchenvater damit sagen wollte, daß er auch die alten griechischen Philosophen Christen nannte, wenn wir einmal versuchen uns hineinzuversetzen in das Gemüt derjenigen Seelen, die in den ersten Jahrhunderten verständnisvoll ihr persönliches Verhältnis zu dem Christus zu bestimmen suchten. Diese dachten den Christus nicht so, als ob er vor dem Mysterium von Golgatha ohne Verbindung mit der Erdenentwickelung gewesen wäre. Der Christus hatte immer mit der Erdenentwickelung etwas zu tun. Durch das Mysterium von Golgatha ist nur seine Aufgabe, seine Mission in bezug auf die Erdenentwickelung eine andere geworden, als sie früher war. Den Christus in der Erdenentwickelung zu suchen erst seit dem Mysterium von Golgatha, das ist nicht christlich! Wahre Christen wissen, daß der Christus immer mit der Erdenentwickelung zu tun hatte.
Wenden wir zunächst den Blick zum jüdischen Volke. Kannte das jüdische Volk den Christus? Ich spreche jetzt nicht davon, ob das jüdische Volk den Christus-Namen kannte, nicht davon, ob das jüdische Volk ein Bewußtsein hatte von all dem, was ich Ihnen zu sagen habe, sondern davon spreche ich, ob ein wirklich das Christentum Verstehender sagen kann: Das Judentum hatte den Christus, das Judentum kannte den Christus. — Man kann ja auch irgendeinen Menschen in seiner Mitte haben, den man sozusagen seiner äußeren Gestalt nach sieht, aber dessen Wesenheit man nicht erkennt, den man nicht charakterisieren könnte, weil man nicht sich zu seiner Erkenntnis aufgeschwungen hat. Ich möchte sagen: Im richtig christlichen Sinne hatte das alte Judentum den Christus, nur erkannte es ihn nicht seiner Wesenheit nach. — Ist das, was ich eben sagte, christlich? Es ist christlich, so wahr als es paulinisch ist.
Wo war für das alte Judentum der Christus? Es wird gesagt im Alten Testament, daß, als Moses die Juden aus Ägypten in die Wüste führte (2. Mose 14), bei Tag eine Wolkensäule, bei Nacht eine Feuersäule ihnen voranzog. Es wird gesagt, daß die Juden durch das Meer zogen und daß das Meer sich ihnen teilte, so daß sie es durchwaten konnten, während die Ägypter hinterher ertranken, da das Meer sich schloß. Es wird erzählt, daß die Juden murrten, weil sie kein Wasser hatten, daß aber auf die Aufforderung ihres Gottes Moses zu einem Fels gehen konnte, daß er aus dem Felsen Wasser herausschlagen konnte mit seinem Stabe und daß dieses Wasser die Juden labte.
Wollten wir auf eine menschlich-verständliche Weise diese Führung der Juden durch Moses aussprechen, so würden wir sagen: Moses führte die Juden, indem er selbst geführt ward von seinem Gotte. Welches war dieser Gott?
Antworten wir zunächst nicht selbst. Lassen wir Paulus antworten, wer der Gott war, der die Juden durch die Wüste führte. Wir lesen im ersten Korintherbrief, Kapitel 10, Verse 1-4, als die Worte des Paulus:
«Ich will euch aber, lieben Brüder, nicht verhalten, daß unsere Väter sind alle unter der Wolke gewesen» — er meint die Wolken- und Feuersäule — «und sind alle durchs Meer gegangen, und sind alle auf Mose getauft mit der Wolke und mit dem Meer, und haben alle einerlei geistige Speise gegessen, und haben alle einerlei geistigen Trank getrunken; sie tranken aber von dem geistigen Fels, der mitfolgte, welcher war Christus.»
Wer also war bei Paulus derjenige, der die Juden geführt hat, der mit Moses gesprochen hat, der das Wasser aus dem Felsen laufen ließ, der das Meer ablenkte von den Pfaden der Juden? Nur derjenige, der behaupten wollte, Paulus sei kein Christ, der dürfte behaupten, daß es unchristlich sei, in dem führenden Gott des Alten Testaments, in dem Herrn des Moses den Christus zu sehen.
Eine Stelle muß, wie ich glaube, im Alten Testament wirklich für ein tieferes Nachdenken große Schwierigkeiten bereiten. Es ist eine Stelle, an die sich derjenige, der nicht gedankenlos das Alte Testament liest, sondern der es im Zusammenhang verstehen will, immer wieder und wieder wendet. Was mag diese Stelle bedeuten? sagt er sich. Es ist die folgende Stelle:
«Und Moses hob seine Hand auf und schlug den Felsen mit dem Stabe zweimal. Da ging viel Wasser heraus, daß die Gemeinde trank und ihr Vieh. Der Herr aber sprach zu Moses und Aaron: Darum, daß ihr nicht an mich geglaubt habt, mich zu heiligen vor den Kindern Israels, sollt ihr diese Gemeinde nicht in das Land bringen, das ich ihnen geben werde.» (4. Mose 20, 11-12)
Nehmen Sie diese Stelle im Zusammenhang im Alten Testament. Der Herr befiehlt Moses, als das Volk murrt, mit dem Stabe an den Fels zu schlagen. Moses schlägt mit seinem Stabe an den Fels, Wasser kommt heraus. Alles geschieht durch Moses und Aaron, was der Herr befohlen hat, und gleich darauf werden wir unterrichtet, daß der Herr dem Moses den Vorwurf macht — wenn es ein Vorwurf ist —, daß er nicht an ihn geglaubt habe. Was bedeutet das? Nehmen Sie alles durch, was an Kommentaren zu dieser Stelle geschrieben worden ist, und versuchen Sie mit diesen Kommentaren die Stelle zu verstehen. Man versteht sie eben so, wie man vieles in der Bibel versteht, nämlich eigentlich nicht, denn hinter dieser Stelle verbirgt sich ein gewaltiges Geheimnis. Dasjenige verbirgt sich an dieser Stelle, was uns da besagen will: Der, der den Moses führte, der dem Moses im brennenden Dornbusch erschien, der das Volk durch die Wüste führte, der Wasser aus dem Felsen herausfließen ließ, das war der Herr, Christus! Aber die Zeit war noch nicht gekommen, Moses erkannte ihn selbst nicht, Moses hielt ihn noch für einen anderen. Das bedeutet es: daß Moses nicht geglaubt habe an den, der ihm befohlen hat, mit dem Stabe an den Felsen zu schlagen.
Wie erschien der Herr — Christus — dem Judenvolk? Nun, wir hören es ja, «bei Tage in einer Wolkensäule, bei Nacht in einer Feuersäule», dadurch daß er zu ihrem Heile das Wasser trennte; und vieles tat er noch, wir brauchen es nur nachzulesen im Alten 'Testament. Wir möchten sagen: In Wolken- und Feuererscheinungen, in der Luft, in den elementaren Ereignissen der Natur, da war er wirksam, aber niemals war den alten Juden aufgegangen: Dasjenige, was in der Wolkensäule, in der Feuersäule erschien, was Wunder wirkte wie etwa durch die Teilung des Meeres, das erscheint in seiner ureigensten Form auch in der Menschenseele. Warum war das den alten Juden niemals aufgegangen? Weil die Menschenseele die Kraft verloren hatte, ihr tiefstes Wesen in sich zu erfühlen, ihre Kraft verloren hatte durch den Hergang, den die Entwickelung der Menschheit genommen hatte. So konnte die Judenseele in die Natur schauen, sie konnte die Herrlichkeit der Elementarereignisse auf sich wirken lassen. Da überall konnte sie ihren Gott und Herrn vermuten; in sich selbst, so wie sie war, unmittelbar, konnte sie ihn nicht finden.
Da haben wir im Alten Testament den Christus, da wirkte er, aber die Menschen haben ihn nicht erkannt. Wie wirkte er, der Christus? Nun, sehen wir denn nicht, wenn wir das Alte Testament durchgehen, wie er wirkte? Das Bedeutsamste, was Moses durch Jahves Mund seinem Volke zu geben hatte, waren die Zehn Gebote. Er hatte sie erhalten aus der Kraft der Elemente heraus, aus der Jahve zu ihm sprach. Nicht stieg Moses in die Tiefen seiner eigenen Seele hinab, nicht fragte Moses etwa in einsamer Meditation: Wie spricht der Gott im eigenen Herzen? Hinauf ging er auf den Berg, durch die Kraft der Elemente enthüllte sich ihm der göttliche Wille. Wille, das ist der Grundcharakter des Alten Testaments. Man nennt diesen Grundcharakter auch oftmals den Gesetzes-Charakter. Wille wirkt durch die Menschheitsentwickelung, und er spricht sich aus in den Gesetzen, zum Beispiel im Dekalog, in den Zehn Geboten. Seinen Willen hat durch die Elemente der Gott den Menschen kundgegeben. Wille waltet in der Erdenevolution. Das ist gleichsam der Sinn des Alten Testamentes, und Unterwerfung unter diesen Willen fordert das Alte Testament seinem ganzen Sinne nach von den Menschen.
Stellen wir das vor unsere Seele, was wir eben betrachtet haben, dann können wir das Ergebnis, das Resultat von alledem zusammenfassen mit den Worten: Es ward gegeben den Menschen des Herrn Wille, aber die Menschen haben den Herrn, haben das Göttliche nicht erkannt; nicht so haben sie es erkannt, daß sie es mit der eigenen Menschenseele verbunden gehabt hätten.
Und nun wenden wir den Blick von den Juden hinweg zu den Heiden. Haben die Heiden den Christus gehabt? Ist es christlich, davon zu sprechen, daß etwa auch die Heiden den Christus gehabt haben? Die Heiden hatten ihre Mysterien. Die in den Mysterien Eingeweihten wurden dahin gebracht, daß ihre Seele aus ihrem Leibe heraustrat, daß das Band, durch welches Leib und Seele verknüpft sind, gelöst wurde. Und wenn die Seele außerhalb des Leibes war, dann vernahm die Seele in der geistigen Welt die Geheimnisse des Daseins. Vieles war mit diesen Mysterien verbunden, mancherlei Kenntnisse stiegen den Einzuweihenden in den Mysterien auf. Wenn man aber prüft, was das Höchste war, das der Mysterienschüler in sich aufnehmen konnte, so war es das, daß er außerhalb seines Leibes hingestellt wurde vor den Christus. Wie Moses hingestellt worden ist vor den Christus, so wurde der Mysterienschüler in den Mysterien mit seiner Seele außerhalb des Leibes hingestellt vor den Christus. Der Christus war auch da für die Heiden, aber er war für sie nur da in den Mysterien; er enthüllte sich ihnen nur, wenn die Seele außerhalb des Leibes war. Und wenn auch die Heiden ebensowenig wie die Juden, bei denen auch der Christus war, die Wesenheit, von der jetzt eben gesprochen worden ist, die Wesenheit, vor welche die Mysterienschüler hingestellt worden sind, als den Christus erkannt haben, der Christus war für die Heiden da! Man könnte sagen: Für die Heiden waren Mysterien eingerichtet. In die Mysterien wurden diejenigen aufgenommen, die bereit und reif waren. Durch diese Mysterien wirkte der Christus auf die heidnische Welt. Warum wirkte er so? Er wirkte so, weil ja die Seele der Menschen in ihrer Entwickelung seit dem Erdenanbeginn in sich die eigene Kraft verloren hatte, durch sich ihre wahre Wesenheit zu finden. Es mußte diese wahre Wesenheit sich der Menschenseele enthüllen, wenn sie nicht in den Banden der Menschheit, das heißt, wenn sie nicht mit dem Leibe verbunden war. Da mußte der Christus die Menschen dadurch führen, daß der Mensch gleichsam seiner Menschlichkeit entkleidet wurde als Eingeweihter in den Mysterien. Der Christus war auch für die Heiden da. Er führte sie in den Einrichtungen der Mysterien. Aber niemals war es so, daß der Mensch hätte sagen können: Wenn ich meine eigenen Kräfte entfalte, dann finde ich der Erde Sinn. Dieser Sinn war verloren, war verfinstert. Die Kräfte der Menschenseele waren in zu tiefe Regionen hinuntergedrängt worden, als daß die Seele durch ihre eigenen Kräfte sich den Sinn der Erde hätte geben können.
Wenn wir auf uns wirken lassen, was in den heidnischen Mysterien den Einzuweihenden, den Mysterienschülern gegeben wurde, dann ist es Weisheit. Den Juden wurde der Wille gegeben durch die Gesetze, den heidnischen Mysterienschülern wurde die Weisheit gegeben.
Allein, blicken wir hin auf dasjenige, was diese heidnische Weisheit charakterisiert, können wir das nicht zusammenfassen in den Worten: durch Weisheit konnte der Erdenmensch als solcher — wenn er nicht aus seinem Leibe hinausging, indem er Mysterienschüler wurde — seinen Gott nicht als solchen erkennen? Durch Weisheit ebensowenig wie durch Wille konnte sich die Gottheit für den Menschen enthüllen. Ja, wir finden ein Wort, das ganz wunderbar hallt durch das griechische Altertum wie eine gewaltige Forderung an die Menschheit, aber dieses Wort stand am Eingang des Apollinischen Heiligtums, also einer Mysterienstätte, das Wort: «Erkenne dich selbst.» Was besagt uns die Tatsache, daß an dem Mysterien-Heiligtum dieses Wort «Erkenne dich selbst» wie eine Aufforderung an den Menschen stand? Das besagt es uns, daß man überall draußen, wo der Mensch als Mensch bleibt, was er seit Erdenanbeginn geworden ist, die Forderung «Erkenne dich selbst» nicht erfüllen könne, daß man etwas anderes werden müsse als Mensch, nämlich, daß man in den Mysterien die Bande lösen müsse, durch welche die Seele an den Leib gebunden ist, um sich selbst zu erkennen. So weist uns dieses Wort, das wie eine wunderbare Forderung am Apollinischen Heiligtum stand, ebenfalls darauf hin, daß Verfinsterung eingetreten war für die Menschheit, mit anderen Worten, daß der Gott nicht durch Weisheit zu erreichen war, ebensowenig wie er sich als Wille unmittelbar enthüllen konnte.
Wie die einzelne Menschenseele fühlen kann, daß sie in sich selbst nicht die Kräfte aufbringen kann, die ihr den Erdensinn geben, so sehen wir im historischen Verlauf die Menschenseele dastehen in den Juden so, daß selbst Moses, der Führer der Juden, den nicht erkannte, der ihn führte. Und wir sehen an den Heiden, daß die Forderung «Erkenne dich selbst» nur in den Mysterien erfüllt werden konnte, weil der Mensch, wie er geworden ist im Laufe der Erdenentwickelung mit seinem Zusammenhang von Leib und Seele, die Kraft nicht zu entfalten vermag, durch die er sich selbst erkennen kann. Es tönt herüber das Wort zu uns: «Nicht durch Wille und nicht durch Weisheit ist der Gott zu erkennen.» Durch was sollte der Gott erkannt werden ?
Wir haben ja den Zeitpunkt in seiner Wesenheit öfter charakterisiert, in dem der Christus in die Entwickelung der Erdenmenschheit eintrat. Wir wollen uns jetzt einmal ganz genau den Sinn vor Augen führen, den es hat, wenn man davon spricht, daß eine gewisse Verfinsterung der Menschenseele eingetreten war, daß weder durch Wille noch durch Weisheit zu enthüllen war das eigentlich Göttliche. Welchen Sinn hat denn das eigentlich?
Ja, man spricht von so mancherlei Beziehungen des Menschlichen zu dem Göttlichen. Man spricht, wenn man von den Beziehungen des Menschlichen zu dem Göttlichen spricht und von dem Sinn, den das Menschliche in dem Göttlichen hat, man spricht davon so, daß wirklich oftmals nicht zu unterscheiden ist, wie das Menschliche zu dem Göttlichen sich verhält, und wie irgendein anderes Irdisches zum Beispiel sich zu dem Göttlichen verhält. Heute finden wir ja noch immer, daß Philosophen sich durch reine Philosophie zu dem Göttlichen erheben wollen. Aber durch reine Philosophie kann man nicht zu dem Göttlichen kommen. Gewiß kommt man durch reine Philosophie dazu, zu wissen, daß ein Göttliches in der Welt waltet, und sich verbunden zu fühlen mit dem Weltenall; gewiß kommt man dazu, zu wissen, daß die menschliche Wesenheit mit dem Tode irgendwie mit dem Weltenall verbunden werden müsse, allein wie sie verbunden wird, dazu kann man durch reine Philosophie nicht kommen. Warum nicht? Ja, wenn Sie den ganzen Sinn desjenigen, was wir heute schon besprochen haben, nehmen, so werden Sie sich sagen können: Das, was sich zunächst dem Erdenmenschen in seiner Seele enthüllt zwischen Geburt und Tod, das ist eben in seinen Kräften zu schwach, um irgend etwas wahrzunehmen, das über das Irdische hinausgeht, das in das Göttlich-Geistige hineinführt. Wir wollen, um uns das ganz deutlich zu machen, einmal forschen nach dem Sinn der Unsterblichkeit.
Viele Menschen wissen heute schon gar nicht mehr, welches eigentlich der Sinn menschlicher Unsterblichkeit sein kann. Viele Menschen reden heute vor allen Dingen von Unsterblichkeit auch dann, wenn sie nur zugeben können, daß die Menschenseele mit ihrer Wesenheit durch die Pforte des Todes hindurchgeht und dann etwa irgend welchen Platz im All findet. Das aber tut jedes Wesen. Dasjenige, was mit dem Kristall vereinigt ist, wenn er sich auflöst, geht in das All über; die Pflanze, die hinwelkt, geht in das All über; das Tier, das abstirbt, geht in das All über. Für den Menschen verhält sich die Sache doch noch anders. Unsterblichkeit hat für den Menschen nur einen Sinn, wenn er durch die Pforte des Todes sein Bewußtsein tragen kann. Denken Sie sich eine unsterbliche Menschenseele, die etwa nach dem Tode unbewußt wäre. Solche Unsterblichkeit hätte keinen Sinn, hätte nicht den geringsten Sinn. Bewußtsein muß die Menschenseele durch den Tod tragen, wenn sie von ihrer Unsterblichkeit sprechen soll. So wie die Seele mit dem Leibe vereint ist, kann sie nichts in sich finden, von dem sie sagen könnte: Das ist so, daß ich es bewußt durch den Tod trage. Denn das Bewußtsein des Menschen ist eingeschlossen zwischen Geburt und Tod, es reicht ja nur bis zum Tode. So wie es die menschliche Seele zunächst hat, dieses Bewußtsein, so reicht es nur bis zum Tode. In dieses Bewußtsein leuchtet hinein der göttliche Wille, zum Beispiel in den Zehn Geboten. Lesen Sie im Buch Hiob, ob dieses Hineinleuchten den Menschen so weit hat bringen können, daß sein Bewußtsein etwa aufgerüttelt worden wäre und solche Kräfte aus sich herausgetrieben hätte, daß er sich hätte sagen können: Ich gehe mit Bewußtheit durch die Pforte des Todes. Oh, wie mutet uns an das Wort, das zu dem Hiob gesprochen worden ist: «Sage Gott ab und stirb!» (Hiob 2, 9) Wir wissen, der Mann ist unsicher, ob er mit Bewußtsein durch die Pforte des Todes geht. Und stellen wir dazu das griechische Wort, das uns des Griechen Furcht vor dem Tode vorstellt: Besser ein Bettler in der Oberwelt als ein König im Reiche der Schatten — dann haben wir auch aus dem Heidentum heraus den Beleg, wie unsicher man geworden war über menschliche Unsterblichkeit. Und wie unsicher sind selbst heute noch viele Menschen. Alle die Menschen, die da sprechen, daß der Mensch, indem er durch die Pforte des Todes geht, in dem All aufgehe, sich mit irgendeinem Allwesen verbinde, achten nicht darauf, was die Seele, wenn sie von ihrer Unsterblichkeit sprechen will, sich selbst zuschreiben muß.
Wir brauchen nur ein Wort auszusprechen, und wir werden erkennen, wie der Mensch zu seiner Unsterblichkeit stehen muß. Dieses Wort ist das Wort Liebe. Und all dasjenige, was wir über die Unsterblichkeit gesagt haben, können wir jetzt mit dem in Zusammenhang bringen, was das Wort Liebe bezeichnet. Liebe ist nichts, was wir uns aneignen durch den Willen. Liebe ist nichts, was wir uns aneignen durch Weisheit. Liebe sitzt in der Region der Gefühle. Aber wir wissen und müssen es uns gestehen, daß die menschliche Seele, wie sie sein sollte, nicht sein könnte, wenn diese menschliche Seele nicht erfüllt sein könnte von Liebe. Ja, man kommt darauf, wenn man in das Wesen der Seele eindringt, daß unsere Menschenseele nicht mehr Menschenseele sein würde, wenn sie nicht lieben könnte.
Nun aber denken wir uns einmal, wir gingen durch die Pforte des Todes so, daß wir verlören unsere Menschenindividualität, daß wir uns vereinigen würden mit einer Allgöttlichkeit. Dann wären wir in dieser Göttlichkeit darinnen, wir gehörten dazu. Wir könnten den Gott nicht mehr lieben, wir wären in ihm selbst. Liebe hätte keinen Sinn, wenn wir in dem Gotte wären. Zugeben müssen wir, wenn wir unsere Individualität nicht durch den Tod tragen könnten, daß wir im Tode die Liebe verlieren müßten, daß die Liebe in dem Augenblick aufhören müßte, wo die Individualität aufhört. Lieben kann nur ein Wesen das andere, das von dem andern getrennt ist. Wollen wir unsere Gottesliebe durch den Tod tragen, dann müssen wir durch den Tod unsere Individualität tragen, dann müssen wir durch den Tod tragen dasjenige, was in uns die Liebe entzündet. Sollte dem Menschen der Sinn der Erde gebracht werden, dann mußte ihm Aufschluß gebracht werden über seine Unsterblichkeit so, daß sein Wesen als unzertrennlich mit der Liebe gedacht werde. Nicht Wille und nicht Weisheit können dem Menschen geben, was er braucht; geben kann dem Menschen das, was er braucht, allein die Liebe.
Was war denn verdunkelt worden im Laufe des Entwickelungsganges des Menschen über die Erde? Nehmen wir den Juden oder nehmen wir den Heiden: verdunkelt war worden das Bewußtsein über den Tod hinaus. Bewußtsein zwischen Geburt und Tod; außerhalb von Geburt und Tod Dunkelheit, nichts verbleibt vom Bewußtsein innerhalb des Erdenleibes. «Erkenne dich selbst!» am Eingang des griechischen Heiligtumes: heiligste Forderung dieses griechischen Heiligtums an die Menschheit. Aber der Mensch konnte sich nur die Antwort geben: Ja, ich kann mich, wenn ich so verbunden bleibe in meinem Leibe mit meiner Seele, wie ich es als Erdenmensch bin, nicht in jener Individualität erkennen, die über den Tod hinaus lieben kann. Das kann ich nicht! Erkenntnis, daß man über den Tod hinaus als Individualität lieben kann, das war es, was den Menschen verloren gegangen war.
Tod ist nicht das Aufhören des physischen Leibes. Dieses kann nur der Materialist sagen. Man denke sich nur einmal, daß der Mensch sein Bewußtsein in jeder Stunde, in der er im Leibe lebt, so hätte, daß er so gewiß wissen würde, was über den Tod hinaus liegt, wie er heute weiß, daß morgen die Sonne aufgehen und über den Himmel gehen wird, dann hätte der Tod keinen Stachel für den Menschen, dann wäre der Tod nicht dasjenige, was wir den Tod nennen, dann wüßten die Menschen im Leibe, daß der Tod nur eine Erscheinung ist, die von einer Form zur anderen führt. Unter «Tod» verstand auch Paulus nicht das Aufhören des physischen Leibes, sondern unter «Tod» verstand er die Tatsache, daß das Bewußtsein nur bis zum Tode reicht, daß der Mensch, insofern er an den Leib gebunden war im damaligen Erdenleben, innerhalb seines Leibes sein Bewußtsein nur bis zu dem Tode hindehnen konnte. Wir können überall hinzusetzen, wo Paulus vom Tode spricht: Mangel eines Bewußtseins über den Tod hinaus.
Was gab dem Menschen das Mysterium von Golgatha? Stand mit dem Mysterium von Golgatha eine Summe von Naturereignissen vor der Menschheit, eine Wolkensäule, eine Feuersäule? Nein, ein Mensch stand vor den Menschen, der Christus Jesus. Erfüllte sich etwa mit dem Mysterium von Golgatha aus der geheimnisvollen Natur heraus so etwas, daß ein Meer sich spaltete, damit das Volk Gottes durchziehen könne? Nein, ein Mensch stand da vor den Menschen und machte Lahme gehend und Blinde sehend. Von einem Menschen ging das aus.
Der Jude hatte in die Natur schauen müssen, wenn er denjenigen hat sehen wollen, den er seinen göttlichen Herrn nennt. Einen Menschen konnte man jetzt sehen, von einem Menschen konnte man so reden, daß der Gott in ihm lebe. Der Heide hatte eingeweiht werden müssen, er hatte die Seele aus dem Leibe herausziehen müssen, um der Wesenheit gegenüberzustehen, die der Christus ist. Er hat auf der Erde den Christus nicht vermuten können, er konnte nur wissen, daß der Christus außerhalb der Erde ist. Das aber, was außerhalb der Erde war, es ist auf die Erde gekommen, es hat einen Menschenleib angenommen.
In dem Christus Jesus stand als Mensch vor den Menschen diejenige Wesenheit, die sonst vor der leibbefreiten Seele in den Mysterien gestanden hatte. Und was ist dadurch geschehen ? Der Anfang ist damit gemacht worden, daß die Kräfte, die der Mensch verloren hat in der Erdenentwickelung seit Erdenanbeginn, diese Kräfte, durch die ihm seine Unsterblichkeit verbürgt wird, durch das Mysterium von Golgatha wieder an ihn herankommen. In der Überwindung des Todes auf Golgatha haben die Kräfte den Ursprung genommen, die in der Menschenseele wieder anfachen können die verlorengegangenen Kräfte. Und des Menschen Weg durch die Erdenentwickelung wird weiter so sein, daß, indem der Mensch den Christus immer mehr und mehr aufnehmen wird, er in sich entdecken wird dasjenige, was in ihm über den Tod hinaus lieben kann, das heißt, daß er als unsterbliche Individualität seinem Gott gegenüberstehen kann. Darum ist erst seit dem Mysterium von Golgatha das Wort wahr geworden: «Liebe Gott über alles und deinen Nächsten als dich selbst.» (Lukas 10, 27)
Wille wurde gegeben aus dem brennenden Dornbusch. Wille wurde gegeben durch die Gebote. Weisheit wurde gegeben durch die Mysterien. Die Liebe aber wurde gegeben, indem der Gott Mensch geworden ist in dem Christus Jesus. Und die Bürgschaft, daß wir über den Tod hinaus lieben können, daß eine Liebesgemeinschaft gestiftet werden kann durch die wiedergewonnenen Kräfte unserer Seele zwischen dem Menschen und Gott und allen Menschen untereinander, die Bürgschaft dafür geht von dem Mysterium von Golgatha aus. Die Menschenseele hat in dem Mysterium von Golgatha dasjenige gefunden, was sie seit Erdenurbeginn verloren hat, indem ihre Kräfte immer schwächer und schwächer geworden sind.
Drei Kräfte in drei menschlichen Seelengliedern: Wille, Weisheit und Liebe! In dieser Liebe erlebt die Seele ihr Verhältnis zum Christus.
Von einer gewissen Seite her wollte ich Ihnen das vor Augen führen. Was aphoristisch geklungen hat in der heutigen Auseinandersetzung, es wird seinen Zusammenhang in den Betrachtungen der folgenden Tage finden. Das aber, glaube ich, können wir tief in unsere Seele schreiben, daß ein Fortschritt in der Christus-Erkenntnis ein realer Erwerb für die Menschenseele ist, und daß auch dann, wenn wir die Beziehung der Menschenseele zu dem Christus betrachten, uns wiederum so recht klar wird, wie gleichsam eine Hülle war zwischen der Menschenseele und dem Christus vor dem Mysterium von Golgatha, wie diese Hülle durchbrochen worden ist durch das Mysterium von Golgatha, und wie wir mit Recht sagen können: Durch das Mysterium von Golgatha ist eingeflossen eine kosmische Wesenheit in das Erdenleben, eine überirdische Wesenheit verband sich mit der Erde.
Gestatten Sie, meine lieben Freunde, auch heute — vielleicht werden die nächsten Tage nochmals Gelegenheit dazu geben — eine Bemerkung, die ich aber auch unter Ihnen machen möchte:
Die Vorwürfe, die Gegnerschaften gegenüber unserer geisteswissenschaftlichen Lehre, sie werden immer stärker und stärker. Mit viel Wahrheit kämpfen allerdings diese Gegnerschaften nicht, aber diese Gegnerschaften sind immerhin da. Überlegen wir uns einmal ein Wort, das Sie in den letzten T’agen auch hier haben lesen können, das von anderer Seite gesprochen worden ist und das hier wiederholt worden ist, überlegen wir uns dieses Wort am Schlusse dieser Betrachtungen, die uns wiederum von einer anderen Seite her gezeigt haben, wie eine kosmische Wesenheit im Christus eine irdische Wesenheit wird — ich meine das Wort, das da gesprochen worden ist, als ob es irgend etwas Unchristliches hätte, von dem Christus als von einer kosmischen Wesenheit zu sprechen. Ja, sogar so ist das Wort gesprochen worden, daß gesagt worden sein soll: «Diese theosophische oder anthroposophische Lehre, die sieht gar nicht, wie es unchristlich ist, von einem kosmischen Prinzip, von einer kosmischen Wesenheit zu sprechen, während gerade dasjenige die Menschen gewonnen hat, was die Evangelien in ihren Einzelheiten über das Menschliche des Jesus erzählen.» Menschen, die so etwas sagen, sie dünken sich recht christlich. Aber viele, die sich christlich dünken, bemerken gar nicht, daß sie mit ihrer Christlichkeit alle Augenblicke der wahren Christlichkeit ins Gesicht schlagen. Unchristlich soll es sein, von Christus als einer Wesenheit zu sprechen, die eine kosmische Wesenheit ist, das heißt die nicht für die Erde bloß, sondern für den Kosmos Bedeutung hat! Das wurde gesagt von einer Seite, die das Christentum verteidigen will gegenüber der Geistesforschung. Gesagt wurde: «Der Christus, so wie er uns entgegentritt, ohne daß wir auf das Kosmische Rücksicht nehmen, der wird in Menschenseelen leben, solange die Erde steht.» Ich glaube nicht, daß viele Leute merken, wie sonderbar unevangelisch die Zunge redet gerade mit solch einem Wort. Man wird vielleicht zuweilen merken: Da spricht Gegnerschaft gegen die Geisteswissenschaft — nun ja, man kann das verstehen. Das ist eben so, daß da vom «christlichen Standpunkt» aus gesprochen wird. — Dieser christliche Standpunkt aber, ist er ein wirklich christlicher Standpunkt? Er verketzert uns — denn Verketzerung darf das schon genannt werden —, er nimmt das als sein Privilegium in Anspruch; er verketzert uns. Er findet unser Christentum oder, besser gesagt, unsere Anthroposophie als Christentum bedenklich. In ihm lebt nicht nur in seinem Begriff das wirkliche Christentum nicht mehr, sondern auch in seinen Seelenlebensgewohnheiten lebt nicht das richtige Christentum. Denn die Seele, die richtig christlich ist, sie wird niemals sagen: Solange die Erde steht, wird der Christus, der da gemeint ist, in den Herzen der Menschen leben. — Warum nicht? Weil ein Christ, der das sagt, einfach vergessen hat die Worte der Evangelien: «Himmel und Erde werden vergehen, aber meine Worte werden nicht vergehen.» (Matthäus 24, 35) Damit aber ist auch der Christus als kosmische Wesenheit hingestellt. Und derjenige, der wahr macht ein Wort, wie «Himmel und Erde werden vergehen, aber meine Worte werden nicht vergehen», der spricht christlich. Derjenige aber, dem im Augenblick gleich die Zunge ausgleitet, wenn er sein Christentum gegen die Anthroposophie richten will, der sündigt gegen das Wort «Himmel und Erde werden vergehen, aber meine Worte werden nicht vergehen», indem er sagt: Wir wollen einen Christus, der da wirkt, solange die Erde steht; — der versteht nichts von dem wahren Christentum, das nicht bloß in den Büchern, sondern auch in den Sternen steht.
Wir müssen uns schon zuweilen verständigen, wessen Geistes manche Angriffe sind, die heute von da oder dort gegen die Christlichkeit unserer Anthroposophie vorgebracht werden. Man merkt an dem Zungenausgleiten manchmal viel mehr, zu was das Christentum in solchen Seelen geworden ist, als durch das Lesen, wie es heute üblich ist.
Was die Menschenseele erleben kann mit ihrem Christus in sich, wir wollen dann in den allernächsten Tagen davon sprechen.
First Lecture
My friends from Norrköping have requested that I speak on a topic that is related to that being which is closest to us in the field of spiritual science: the being of Christ. And I have tried to fulfill this request by deciding to speak about the revival and significance of this revival of the Christ being in the human soul. This topic will give us the opportunity to speak, from a spiritual scientific point of view, about the most human, most heartfelt meaning of Christianity.
This human soul! In spiritual scientific terms, we have a short word which, although it does not encompass everything that the human soul means to us, nevertheless points to that which, in a sense, fills and permeates the soul in its broadest sense for us earthly human beings — we have the short word “I.” Our I-being extends as far as our soul life insofar as we are earthly human beings. When we utter the name of the I-being, we immediately remember that with this I-being we are designating one of the four members of the human being that are closest to us. We speak of four members of the human being in the first instance: the physical body, the etheric body, the astral body, and the I. And we need only recall a few things in order to gain a starting point for the consideration we wish to undertake in these days. We need only recall that we do not view the physical body of the human being as if its laws — the essence it contains — were recognizable to us from what our earthly environment initially presents. We know that if we want to understand the physical human body, we must go back to three previous incarnations of our Earth, to the Saturn, Sun, and Moon incarnations; we know that in the distant past, during the Saturn incarnation of our Earth, the physical body already acquired its predisposition; we then know that during the Sun incarnation the etheric body acquired its predisposition, and during the Moon incarnation the astral body. And what is our Earth's development, in essence, other than that which, in all its phases, in all its epochs, gives the I the opportunity to realize itself in all its expansiveness!
We can say: Just as the physical body had reached a certain stage of its development that was significant for it at the end of the Saturn evolution, just as the etheric body had reached a stage that was significant for it at the end of the Sun evolution, and the astral body had reached a stage that was significant for it at the end of the Moon evolution, so our I will have reached a significant point in its development at the end of the Earth evolution. And we speak of our I developing through three soul members: through the sentient soul, the intellectual or emotional soul, and the conscious soul. All the worlds enclosed by these three soul members also have something to do with our I. It is these three soul members that, in the course of our earth's evolution, first prepared the three outer physical members, the physical body, the etheric body, and the astral body, prepared them through long earth ages, and which now, in successive cultural epochs of the post-Atlantean time, are in a certain sense continuing to develop, which in future earth ages will adapt themselves again to the astral body, etheric body, and physical body, so that the earth can prepare itself to pass over into the Jupiter evolution.
If we take the expression broadly enough, we could even call the earth evolution of man his soul evolution. One could say that when the Earth began, the soul also began to stir in human beings according to a certain law. It first worked on the outer shells, then it worked its way out and is now preparing to work on the outer shells again so that the Jupiter evolution can be prepared. Now we must keep in mind what human beings are to become in their souls during the Earth's evolution. They are to become what could be called personality. This personality requires, first of all, what can be called free will; but on the other hand, it also requires the possibility of finding within itself the way to the divine in the world. Free will on the one hand, the possibility of choosing between good and evil, between beauty and ugliness, between truth and falsehood, this free will on the one hand, and the grasping of the divine in such a way that it penetrates our soul and we feel inwardly fulfilled, freely fulfilled with the divine on the other hand, these are the two goals of human soul development on earth.
This human soul development on earth has now, one might say, received two religious gifts for these two goals. One religious gift is intended to transfer into the human soul the forces that lead to freedom, to the distinction between true and false, beautiful and ugly, good and evil. On the other hand, another religious gift had to be given to human beings during their earthly development in order to implant in the soul the seed through which the soul can feel the divine united within itself.
The first religious gift is what confronts us at the beginning of the Old Testament in the grandiose image of the Fall, of temptation. The second religious gift is what confronts us in everything we encompass with the word “mystery of Golgotha.”
Just as the Fall and temptation have to do with what was planted in human beings—freedom, the ability to distinguish between good and evil, beautiful and ugly, true and false—so the mystery of Golgotha has to do with the soul of the human being being able to find its way back to the divine, being able to know: the divine can shine within it, the divine can permeate it. In a sense, these two religious gifts encompass everything that is important in the evolution of the earth, everything in the evolution of the earth that has to do with what the soul can experience in its deepest depths, everything that is most deeply connected with the being and becoming of the human soul.
How are these two religious gifts connected with the nature and development of the human soul and with the inner experience of the human soul?
Now, I do not want to describe what I have to say to you in abstract terms; I would like to start with a very concrete observation. I would like to start with how a certain scene from the mystery of Golgotha appears to us in historical tradition, as it has been imprinted and should be imprinted even more deeply in the hearts and souls of human beings. Let us assume for a moment that we have before us in Christ Jesus the being whom we have often discussed and characterized in the course of our spiritual scientific observations; let us assume that we have before our spiritual eyes in Christ Jesus that which must appear to us human beings as the most important thing in the entire universe. And then let us contrast this feeling, this emotion, with the shouting and raging of the excited crowd in Jerusalem before the crucifixion, at the condemnation. Let us imagine before our spiritual eyes the fact that the Sanhedrin in Jerusalem considers it very important above all else to ask Christ Jesus how he stands in relation to the divine, whether he professes himself to be the Son of God. And let us grasp with our spiritual eyes that the Sanhedrin considers this to be the greatest blasphemy that Christ Jesus could have uttered. Let us further keep in mind that a scene stands before us, historically, in which the people cry and rage after the death of Christ Jesus. And let us now try to realize what this crying and raging of the people actually means historically. Let us ask ourselves: What should this people have recognized in Christ Jesus?
They should have recognized in Christ Jesus the Being who gives meaning and significance to earthly life. They should have recognized in Christ Jesus the Being who has to accomplish the deed without which humanity on earth cannot find its way back to the divine. They should have recognized that the meaning of earthly human life is not there without this essence. People would have had to erase the word “human” from the history of earthly development if they had wanted to erase the Christ event.
Now let us imagine that this crowd condemns and rages against the very entity that actually makes human beings on earth human, that is supposed to give the earth its goal and meaning. What does this mean? Does it not mean that humanity had arrived at a point in its earthly development where one could say: In those who at that time in Jerusalem represented human knowledge of the true nature of human beings, the knowledge of human beings was obscured; they did not know what human beings are, what human beings are meant to be on Earth. Nothing less is said to us than that humanity had reached a point where it had lost itself, where it condemned that which gives it meaning and significance in earthly development. And from the cries of the agitated crowd, one could hear what was spoken, not out of wisdom, but out of folly: We no longer want to be human beings; we want to cast off what gives us further meaning as human beings.
When we consider all this, we see in a somewhat different light than usual what is called, for example, in the Pauline Christianity, “the relationship of man to sin and guilt.” Paul means that in the course of his development, man was able to fall into sin and guilt, which he could not wash away from himself. And in order for man to be able to wash away sin and guilt, and with it everything connected with sin and guilt, Christ had to come to earth. That is Paul's opinion. And one might say: if this opinion needs any real proof, it is given in the rage and cries of those who shout, “Crucify him!” For in this cry lies the fact that human beings did not know what they themselves were meant to do on earth, that their earlier development was aimed at spreading darkness over their being.
This brings us to what could be called “the preparatory mood of the human soul for the Christ being.” This preparatory mood of the human soul for the Christ being consists in the fact that the soul—even if it cannot express this in clear words—feels through what it can experience within itself: I have developed since the beginning of the earth in such a way that I cannot reach my goal of development through what I have within myself. Where is something I can cling to, something I can take into myself so that I can reach my goal of development? Feeling as if the human being goes far beyond what the soul can initially achieve through its own power due to its previous earthly development is the preparatory Christian mood. And when the soul then finds what it must necessarily be connected to through its essence, but cannot find the power within itself, when the soul finds what gives it these powers, then what it has found is Christ. Then the soul develops its relationship to Christ, and then the soul stands on one side and says to itself: At the beginning of life on earth, a being was predestined for me, but it was darkened in me during the course of earthly development, and when I now look into this darkened soul, I lack the power to realize this being. But I turn my spiritual gaze to Christ, who gives me these powers. — There then stands the human soul, standing on the one hand in the manner described, and on the other hand feeling Christ approaching it, as if in a direct personal relationship with Christ. There it seeks Christ and knows that it cannot find him unless he gives himself through the human evolution of humanity itself, unless he comes to it from outside.
There is a Christian Church Father who is quite generally recognized and who did not shy away from calling Heraclitus, the Greek philosopher, Socrates, and Plato Christians, Christians who were Christians before Christianity was founded. Why does this Church Father do this? Yes, what we call denominations today obscure many of the teachings that were originally shining Christian teachings. Augustine himself said: “There was something true in all religions, and what was true in all religions was the Christianity in them before there was Christianity in name.” Augustine was still allowed to say that. Today, many would be condemned as heretics if they said the same thing within a Christian denomination.
We can most quickly understand what this Church Father meant when he also called the ancient Greek philosophers Christians if we try to put ourselves in the minds of those souls who, in the first centuries, sought to determine their personal relationship to Christ with understanding. They did not think of Christ as having been without connection to the evolution of the earth before the mystery of Golgotha. Christ always had something to do with the evolution of the earth. Through the mystery of Golgotha, only his task, his mission in relation to the evolution of the earth, became different from what it had been before. To seek Christ in the evolution of the earth only since the mystery of Golgotha is not Christian! True Christians know that Christ always had something to do with the evolution of the earth.
Let us first turn our gaze to the Jewish people. Did the Jewish people know Christ? I am not talking now about whether the Jewish people knew the name Christ, nor about whether the Jewish people were aware of everything I am about to tell you, but rather about whether someone who truly understands Christianity can say: Judaism had Christ, Judaism knew Christ. — One can have someone in one's midst whom one sees, so to speak, in their outer form, but whose essence one does not recognize, whom one cannot characterize because one has not risen to the level of recognizing them. I would like to say: in the true Christian sense, ancient Judaism had Christ, but it did not recognize him in his essence. — Is what I just said Christian? It is Christian, as true as it is Pauline.
Where was Christ for ancient Judaism? It is said in the Old Testament that when Moses led the Jews out of Egypt into the desert (Exodus 14), a pillar of cloud went before them by day and a pillar of fire by night. It is said that the Jews crossed the sea and that the sea parted so that they could wade through, while the Egyptians drowned behind them when the sea closed. It is said that the Jews murmured because they had no water, but that at the request of their God, Moses was able to go to a rock, strike it with his staff, and bring forth water, which refreshed the Jews.
If we wanted to express this guidance of the Jews by Moses in a way that is understandable to humans, we would say: Moses led the Jews by being led himself by his God. Who was this God?
Let us not answer this ourselves for the moment. Let us allow Paul to answer who was the God who led the Jews through the desert. We read in the First Epistle to the Corinthians, chapter 10, verses 1-4, the words of Paul:
"Now I do not want you to be unaware, beloved, that our fathers were all under the cloud” — he means the pillar of cloud and fire — “and all passed through the sea, and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, and all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that followed them, who was Christ.”
Who, then, was it who was with Paul, who led the Jews, who spoke with Moses, who brought water out of the rock, who diverted the sea from the paths of the Jews? Only those who wanted to claim that Paul was not a Christian could claim that it was unchristian to see Christ in the leading God of the Old Testament, in the Lord of Moses.
There is a passage in the Old Testament which, I believe, really causes great difficulty for deeper reflection. It is a passage to which those who do not read the Old Testament thoughtlessly, but who want to understand it in context, return again and again. What can this passage mean? they ask themselves. It is the following passage:
"And Moses lifted up his hand and struck the rock twice with his staff. Then a great deal of water came out, and the community and their livestock drank. But the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, ‘Because you did not believe in me, to sanctify me before the children of Israel, you shall not bring this community into the land I am giving them.’” (Numbers 20:11-12)
Take this passage in context in the Old Testament. When the people murmur, the Lord commands Moses to strike the rock with his staff. Moses strikes the rock with his staff, and water comes out. Everything happens through Moses and Aaron, as the Lord commanded, and immediately afterwards we are told that the Lord reproaches Moses—if it is a reproach—for not believing in him. What does this mean? Go through all the commentaries that have been written on this passage and try to understand it with the help of these commentaries. It can be understood in the same way as much of the Bible can be understood, namely, not really, because behind this passage lies a tremendous secret. What is hidden here is what wants to tell us: The one who led Moses, who appeared to Moses in the burning bush, who led the people through the desert, who brought water out of the rock, was the Lord, Christ! But the time had not yet come, Moses did not recognize him himself, Moses still thought he was someone else. This means that Moses did not believe in the one who commanded him to strike the rock with his staff.
How did the Lord—Christ—appear to the Jewish people? Well, we hear it, “by day in a pillar of cloud, by night in a pillar of fire,” by dividing the waters for their salvation; and he did many other things, we need only read about them in the Old Testament. We would like to say: He was active in cloud and fire phenomena, in the air, in the elemental events of nature, but it never dawned on the ancient Jews that what appeared in the pillar of cloud, in the pillar of fire, what worked wonders such as the parting of the sea, also appears in its most original form in the human soul. Why did the ancient Jews never realize this? Because the human soul had lost the power to feel its deepest essence within itself, had lost its power through the course of human evolution. Thus, the Jewish soul could look into nature and let the glory of the elemental events work upon it. It could sense its God and Lord everywhere; but it could not find him within itself, as it was, directly.
In the Old Testament we have Christ, he was active there, but people did not recognize him. How did he, the Christ, work? Well, when we go through the Old Testament, do we not see how he worked? The most significant thing that Moses had to give his people through the mouth of Yahweh was the Ten Commandments. He had received them from the power of the elements, from Yahweh who spoke to him. Moses did not descend into the depths of his own soul, nor did he ask in solitary meditation: How does God speak in my own heart? He went up the mountain, and through the power of the elements, the divine will was revealed to him. Will is the fundamental character of the Old Testament. This fundamental character is often referred to as the character of the law. Will works through human evolution and expresses itself in laws, for example in the Decalogue, in the Ten Commandments. God has made his will known to human beings through the elements. Will reigns in the evolution of the earth. This is, as it were, the meaning of the Old Testament, and submission to this will is what the Old Testament demands of human beings in its entire meaning.
If we keep what we have just considered before our minds, we can summarize the result of all this with the words: The Lord's will was given to human beings, but human beings did not recognize the Lord, did not recognize the divine; they did not recognize it in such a way that they would have connected it with their own human soul.
And now let us turn our gaze away from the Jews to the pagans. Did the pagans have Christ? Is it Christian to say that the Gentiles also had Christ? The Gentiles had their mysteries. Those initiated into the mysteries were brought to the point where their souls left their bodies, where the bond connecting body and soul was severed. And when the soul was outside the body, it heard the secrets of existence in the spiritual world. Much was connected with these mysteries, and various kinds of knowledge arose in those who were initiated into them. But if we examine what was the highest thing that the mystery student could absorb, it was that he was placed outside his body before Christ. Just as Moses was placed before Christ, so the mystery student was placed before Christ in the mysteries with his soul outside his body. Christ was also there for the Gentiles, but He was only there for them in the mysteries; He revealed Himself to them only when the soul was outside the body. And even though the Gentiles, just like the Jews, among whom Christ was also present, did not recognize the being just spoken of, the being before whom the mystery students were placed, as Christ, Christ was there for the Gentiles! One could say: Mysteries were established for the Gentiles. Those who were ready and mature were admitted to the mysteries. Through these mysteries, Christ worked upon the pagan world. Why did he work in this way? He worked in this way because, since the beginning of the earth, the soul of human beings had lost its own power to find its true essence. This true nature had to reveal itself to the human soul if it was not bound to humanity, that is, if it was not connected to the body. Christ had to guide people through this by stripping them, as it were, of their humanity as initiates into the mysteries. Christ was also there for the pagans. He guided them in the institutions of the mysteries. But it was never the case that human beings could say: When I develop my own powers, then I will find the meaning of the earth. This meaning was lost, it was obscured. The powers of the human soul had been pushed down into regions too deep for the soul to be able to give itself the meaning of the earth through its own powers.
If we allow ourselves to be influenced by what was given to the initiates, the mystery students, in the pagan mysteries, then it is wisdom. The Jews were given the will through the laws, the pagan mystery students were given wisdom.
However, if we look at what characterizes this pagan wisdom, we cannot summarize it in the words: through wisdom, the earthly human being as such — if he did not leave his body by becoming a mystery student — could not recognize his God as such? Through wisdom, just as little as through will, could the deity reveal itself to human beings. Yes, we find a word that echoes wonderfully through Greek antiquity like a powerful demand on humanity, but this word stood at the entrance to the Apollonian sanctuary, that is, a mystery site: the word, “Know thyself.” What does the fact that this word, “Know thyself,” stood at the mystery sanctuary as a challenge to humanity tell us? It tells us that everywhere outside, where human beings remain what they have been since the beginning of time, the demand “Know thyself” cannot be fulfilled, that one must become something other than a human being, namely that one must loosen the bonds that bind the soul to the body in order to know oneself. Thus, this phrase, which stood like a wonderful demand at the sanctuary of Apollo, also points out to us that darkness had fallen upon humanity, in other words, that God could not be reached through wisdom, just as He could not reveal Himself directly as will.
Just as the individual human soul feels that it cannot summon within itself the powers that give it its earthly meaning, so we see in the course of history that the human soul stands there in the Jews in such a way that even Moses, the leader of the Jews, did not recognize the one who led him. And we see in the pagans that the demand “Know thyself” could only be fulfilled in the mysteries, because human beings, as they have become in the course of earthly evolution with their connection between body and soul, are unable to develop the power through which they can know themselves. The words ring out to us: “God cannot be known through will or wisdom.” Through what should God be known?
We have often characterized the moment in his being when Christ entered into the development of the human race on earth. Let us now consider very carefully the meaning of the statement that a certain darkening of the human soul had occurred, that neither will nor wisdom could reveal the true nature of the divine. What is the meaning of this?
Yes, people speak of many different relationships between the human and the divine. When we speak of the relationship between the human and the divine, and of the meaning that the human has in the divine, we speak in such a way that it is often impossible to distinguish between the relationship of the human to the divine and the relationship of any other earthly thing to the divine. Today we still find philosophers who want to rise to the divine through pure philosophy. But pure philosophy cannot lead us to the divine. Certainly, through pure philosophy we can come to know that something divine reigns in the world and feel connected to the universe; certainly, we can come to know that the human being must somehow be connected to the universe through death, but how this connection is made cannot be revealed through pure philosophy. Why not? If you take the whole meaning of what we have already discussed today, you will be able to say to yourself: What is revealed to the earthly human being in his soul between birth and death is too weak in his powers to perceive anything that goes beyond the earthly, that leads into the divine-spiritual. To make this clear to ourselves, let us investigate the meaning of immortality.
Many people today no longer know what the meaning of human immortality can actually be. Many people today talk about immortality, even when they can only admit that the human soul passes through the gate of death with its essence and then finds some place in the universe. But every being does that. That which is united with the crystal when it dissolves passes into the universe; the plant that withers passes into the universe; the animal that dies passes into the universe. For humans, however, the situation is different. Immortality has only one meaning for humans if they can carry their consciousness through the gate of death. Imagine an immortal human soul that is unconscious after death. Such immortality would have no meaning, not the slightest meaning. Consciousness must carry the human soul through death if it is to speak of its immortality. Just as the soul is united with the body, it cannot find anything within itself of which it could say: This is something that I consciously carry through death. For human consciousness is enclosed between birth and death; it only extends to death. Just as the human soul initially has this consciousness, it only extends to death. The divine will shines into this consciousness, for example in the Ten Commandments. Read in the Book of Job whether this shining in has been able to bring man so far that his consciousness has been shaken up and such forces have been driven out of him that he could say to himself: I am passing consciously through the gate of death. Oh, how strange the words spoken to Job seem to us: “Renounce God and die!” (Job 2:9) We know that the man is unsure whether he is consciously passing through the gate of death. And if we add to this the Greek saying that expresses the Greek fear of death: “Better to be a beggar in the upper world than a king in the realm of shadows” — then we also have proof from paganism of how uncertain people had become about human immortality. And how uncertain many people still are today. All those who say that when a person passes through the gate of death, they merge with the universe and connect with some universal being, do not pay attention to what the soul must attribute to itself when it wants to speak of its immortality.
We need only utter one word, and we will recognize how man must stand in relation to his immortality. That word is love. And everything we have said about immortality can now be related to what the word love means. Love is not something we acquire through our will. Love is not something we acquire through wisdom. Love resides in the realm of feelings. But we know and must admit that the human soul, as it should be, could not exist if it were not filled with love. Indeed, when we penetrate into the essence of the soul, we come to the conclusion that our human soul would no longer be a human soul if it were incapable of love.
But now let us imagine that we passed through the gates of death in such a way that we lost our human individuality and united with an universal divinity. Then we would be within this divinity, we would belong to it. We could no longer love God, we would be in him himself. Love would have no meaning if we were in God. We must admit that if we could not carry our individuality through death, we would lose love in death, that love would cease at the moment when individuality ceases. Only a being that is separate from another can love another. If we want to carry our love for God through death, then we must carry our individuality through death, then we must carry through death that which ignites love within us. If the meaning of the earth were to be revealed to man, then he would have to be informed of his immortality in such a way that his being would be conceived as inseparable from love. Neither will nor wisdom can give man what he needs; only love can give man what he needs.
What, then, had been obscured in the course of man's development on earth? Take the Jew or take the pagan: consciousness beyond death had been obscured. Consciousness between birth and death; outside of birth and death, darkness, nothing remains of consciousness within the earthly body. “Know thyself!” at the entrance to the Greek sanctuary: the most sacred demand of this Greek sanctuary on humanity. But man could only give himself the answer: Yes, if I remain connected in my body with my soul as I am as an earthly human being, I cannot recognize myself in that individuality that can love beyond death. I cannot do that! The realization that one can love as an individual beyond death was what man had lost.
Death is not the cessation of the physical body. Only a materialist can say that. Just imagine that human beings had such consciousness during every hour of their physical life that they knew as surely what lies beyond death as they know today that the sun will rise tomorrow and travel across the sky. Then death would have no sting for human beings; then death would not be what we call death; then human beings would know in their bodies that death is only an appearance that leads from one form to another. Paul also did not understand “death” as the cessation of the physical body, but rather as the fact that consciousness only extends to death, that human beings, insofar as they were bound to the body in their former earthly life, could only extend their consciousness within their bodies until death. We can add this wherever Paul speaks of death: lack of consciousness beyond death.
What did the mystery of Golgotha give to human beings? Did the mystery of Golgotha present humanity with a sum of natural events, a pillar of cloud, a pillar of fire? No, a human being stood before the people, Christ Jesus. Did something happen with the mystery of Golgotha, arising from the mysterious nature of things, such that a sea was divided so that the people of God could pass through? No, a human being stood there before the people and made the lame walk and the blind see. This came from a human being.
The Jew had to look into nature if he wanted to see the one he calls his divine Lord. Now one could see a human being, one could speak of a human being in such a way that God lived in him. The pagan had to be initiated, he had to draw his soul out of his body in order to face the being that is Christ. He could not have suspected Christ on earth; he could only know that Christ was outside the earth. But that which was outside the earth came to earth and took on a human body.
In Christ Jesus, the being who had previously stood before the soul freed from the body in the mysteries stood before human beings as a human being. And what happened as a result? The beginning was made when the forces that man lost in the Earth's evolution since the beginning of the Earth, these forces that guarantee his immortality, came back to him through the Mystery of Golgotha. In the overcoming of death on Golgotha, the forces originated that can rekindle the lost forces in the human soul. And the path of human beings through earthly evolution will continue to be such that, as they take Christ more and more into themselves, they will discover within themselves that which can love beyond death, that is, that they can stand before their God as immortal individuals. That is why it is only since the mystery of Golgotha that the words have become true: “Love God above all things and your neighbor as yourself.” (Luke 10:27)
Will was given from the burning bush. Will was given through the commandments. Wisdom was given through the mysteries. But love was given when God became man in Christ Jesus. And the guarantee that we can love beyond death, that a community of love can be established between human beings and God and among all human beings through the regained powers of our soul, comes from the mystery of Golgotha. In the mystery of Golgotha, the human soul found what it had lost since the beginning of the earth, when its powers became weaker and weaker.
Three forces in three human soul members: will, wisdom, and love! In this love, the soul experiences its relationship to Christ.
I wanted to show you this from a certain perspective. What may have sounded aphoristic in today's discussion will find its context in the reflections of the coming days. But I believe we can write deep into our souls that progress in Christ consciousness is a real gain for the human soul, and that even when we consider the relationship of the human soul to Christ, it becomes clear to us once again how there was, as it were, a veil between the human soul and Christ before the Mystery of Golgotha, how this veil was torn through by the Mystery of Golgotha, and how we can rightly say: Through the Mystery of Golgotha, a cosmic being entered into earthly life, a super-earthly being connected itself with the earth.
Allow me, my dear friends, to make a remark today — perhaps the next few days will provide another opportunity — which I would also like to share with you:
The accusations leveled against our spiritual scientific teaching are growing stronger and stronger. These opponents do not fight with much truth, but they are there nonetheless. Let us consider a word that you have also been able to read here in recent days, a word that has been spoken by others and repeated here. Let us consider this word at the end of these reflections, which have again shown us from another perspective how a cosmic being becomes an earthly being in Christ. I am referring to the word that was spoken as if there were something unchristian about to speak of Christ as a cosmic being. Yes, the word was even spoken in such a way that it was said: “This theosophical or anthroposophical teaching does not see how unchristian it is to speak of a cosmic principle, of a cosmic being, when it is precisely this that has won people over, what the Gospels tell us in detail about the humanity of Jesus.” People who say such things consider themselves very Christian. But many who consider themselves Christian do not even notice that with their Christianity they are constantly striking true Christianity in the face. It is supposed to be unchristian to speak of Christ as a being who is a cosmic being, that is, who has significance not only for the earth but for the cosmos! This was said by a group that wants to defend Christianity against spiritual research. They said, “Christ, as he appears to us without our taking the cosmic into consideration, will live in human souls as long as the earth stands.” I don't think many people realize how strangely un-evangelical the tongue speaks with such a word. One may sometimes notice: Here is opposition to spiritual science speaking — well, one can understand that. That is simply the way it is when one speaks from the “Christian standpoint.” But is this Christian standpoint really a Christian standpoint? It condemns us — for condemnation is what it is — it claims this as its privilege; it condemns us. It finds our Christianity, or rather our anthroposophy as Christianity, questionable. Not only does true Christianity no longer live in its concept, but true Christianity does not live in its soul life habits either. For the soul that is truly Christian will never say: As long as the earth stands, the Christ who is meant here will live in the hearts of men. Why not? Because a Christian who says that has simply forgotten the words of the Gospels: “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away” (Matthew 24:35). But this also establishes Christ as a cosmic being. And anyone who makes true a word such as “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away” is speaking Christian. But anyone who immediately slips up when they want to use their Christianity against anthroposophy sins against the words “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away” by saying: We want a Christ who works as long as the earth stands; — he understands nothing of true Christianity, which is not only in books but also in the stars.
We must sometimes understand the spirit behind some of the attacks that are being made today from various quarters against the Christianity of our anthroposophy. One sometimes notices much more from a slip of the tongue what Christianity has become in such souls than from reading, as is customary today.
What the human soul can experience with its Christ within itself, we will speak about in the very next few days.