Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

The Effect of Occult Development Upon the Self and the Sheaths of Man
GA 145

20 March 1913, The Hague

Lecture I

I have to speak to you on a subject which may be important to many at the present day; it is important to all who try in any way to make Theosophy not merely a theory, but to take it into their hearts and minds so that it becomes a vital thing to them; something that enters into the whole of their life as human beings of the present day. It will be important, not only for true esotericists, but also for those who wish to take up theosophical thoughts into the forces of their soul, to know of the changes which take place in the whole human being when the exercises are carried out which are mentioned in my book Knowledge of the Higher Worlds and its Attainment, or those which are mentioned briefly in the second part of my book An Outline Of Occult Science, or when merely the theosophical thoughts are absorbed in heart and mind and made one's own. Theosophy, when taken up seriously, whether esoterically or exoterically, brings about certain changes in the whole organisation of man. It may be boldly affirmed that the student becomes a different man through Theosophy, he transforms the whole construction of his being. The physical body, the etheric body, the astral body and the true Self of a man are all in a certain way transformed through his really taking Theosophy into his inner being. In their order we shall speak of the changes which these human sheaths undergo under the influence of esotericism, or even through the earnest exoteric study of Theosophy. It is especially difficult to speak about the changes in the physical human body, for the simple reason that although the changes that take place there at the beginning of the theosophical or esoteric life are indeed important and significant, they are often indistinct and apparently insignificant. Important, significant changes take place in the physical body, but they cannot be observed externally by an external science. They cannot be observed, simply because the physical is that which man has least of all under his control from within, and because there would at once be danger if esoteric exercises or theosophical effort were to be so directed that the changes in the physical body went beyond the measure of what the student is able fully to control. The changes in the physical body are kept within certain limits; but still it is important that the pupil should know something about them, and that he should understand them. To begin with, if we wish to describe briefly the changes which the human physical body undergoes under the conditions just mentioned, we might say: This human physical body becomes more mobile and inwardly active. More mobile—what does that mean? Now in the normal life of man we see the human physical body with its several organs in communication with one another, and in a certain way connected with one another. The activities of the several organs pass over into each other. When the pupil takes up esotericism or Theosophy seriously, the several organs become more independent of one another. In a certain sense the collective life of the physical body is suppressed, and the separate life of the organs strengthened. Although the extent of the suppression of the collective life and of the strengthening of the separate life of the organs is extremely small, yet we must say that through the influence of esotericism and Theosophy the heart, the brain, the spinal cord and other organs all become more independent of one another, they become inwardly more active and more mobile. If I were to speak in a learned manner, I should say that the organs pass from a stable condition to a more mobile condition of balance. It is well to know this fact, because when the pupil perceives something of this different state of equilibrium in his organs he is very easily inclined to ascribe it to sickness or indisposition. He is not accustomed to feel the mobility and independence of the organs in this manner. He only becomes aware of or feels his organs when they do not function normally. He can now perceive that the organs become independent of one another, even though at first this may be hardly perceptible, and he might think that it was an illness. Now you see how careful we must be when dealing with the physical human body. Obviously, what may at one time be an illness, may at another time be merely a phenomenon pertaining to the inner theosophical life. Hence it is necessary to judge each case individually; although what is here attained through theosophical life will really come without this, in the normal course of the development of humanity. In ancient periods of human development the several organs were still more independent of one another than they are now in external life, and in the future they will again become more and more independent. As the pupil of Theosophy must always, to a certain extent, anticipate in the various realms of life and knowledge the stages of development which will only in the future be reached by the general mass of humanity, he must not mind at this stage of development if his organs become more independent of one another. This change may take place quietly and gently in the several organs and systems of organs. I will give a particular example.

You are all acquainted with the fact that when a man is a ‘stay-at-home,’ when his calling does not allow of much travelling, he becomes in a way attached to his immediate environment, and does not wish to leave it. If you go into the country among the peasants you will find that this exists to a much greater extent than among those who live in towns, and who indeed frequently sojourn in the country; the people have grown one with their soil and climate, and when for some reason they are transported into another district or into a different climate they find it difficult to acclimatise themselves; you will find in their soul, in the form of a home-sickness which often cannot be overcome, the longing for their native soil. This is only to show how necessary it is for the pupil to do something which we see to be necessary in another respect when a man comes into a different region, that is, he must adapt his whole organism to this region, to this climate. Now, in our normal life, this adaptation actually does take place within the whole human organism. Everything is sympathetically affected, in a certain way, when we go from the plains to the mountains, or when we travel to a somewhat distant place. Now, in the esotericist, or in one who seriously takes up Theosophy, it is noticeable that all the organism is not equally affected sympathetically, but the blood-system separates, and the circulation of the blood is severed, as it were, from the rest of the organism, and when the student goes from one district to another the circulation of the blood is the most affected. One who has become sensitive to these things can observe an appreciable difference in the pulsation of the blood, in the beating of the pulse, when simply taking a journey from one place to another. While in the case of a person who is not permeated with esotericism or theosophical life, the nervous system is strongly affected by the necessary acclimatisation; in one who does take up esotericism or a serious theosophical life, the nervous system is but little affected. The intimate union between the nervous system and the blood-system is weakened and divided through the theosophical life, the blood-system becomes in a way more sensitive to the influences of climate and country, and the nervous system becomes more independent of them. If, my dear theosophical friends, you wish to have proofs of this, you must look for them in the most natural way in which they are to be found, that is, when you find yourselves in a similar position, when you yourselves journey to a different place. Try to observe yourselves, and you will find these facts of Occultism confirmed. It is extremely important to bear such facts in mind, simply for the reason that these things gradually develop into a very definite power of perception. A man who has become a Theosophist at heart can tell the character of a strange town by his blood. He need not go very much into other things, he can tell by his blood how the various regions of the earth are different from one another.

On the other hand, the nervous system separates from the whole organism in a different way. A man who studies Theosophy in the right way will gradually notice that he perceives the difference between the four seasons of the year—the difference between summer and winter, for instance—in quite a different way than does the ordinary man of the day. The latter only feels in his own physical body, as a rule, the difference in temperature. One who has taken Theosophy into his soul in the recognised manner, not only perceives the difference in temperature, but, apart from that, he has a particular experience in his nervous system, so that, for instance, it is easier for him in summer to think certain thoughts that are connected with the physical brain than it is in winter. Not that it is impossible to think one thought or another in winter, but one can experience quite distinctly that it is easier to do so in summer; such thoughts flow more easily, as it were, in summer than in winter. We can notice that in winter it is easier to form abstract thoughts, while in summer it is easier to make them concrete and ‘picture-like.’ This is because the nervous system, the instrument for the physical plane, vibrates in a more subtle manner in harmony with the change of the seasons, and more independently of the whole organism than it otherwise does.

But one fundamental change in the physical body is that the student begins to feel his physical body more strongly than before, and this can take very serious forms, the body becomes more sensitive to the soul-life, it becomes harder to bear. It is extremely difficult to explain this clearly. Imagine a glass of water in which a certain substance, salt for instance, has been dissolved, yielding an opaque solution. Suppose in the normal condition of man his etheric body, astral body, and Self to be the fluid, and his physical body dissolved in it to be the salt. Now cool down the fluid in the glass. The salt gradually hardens, it becomes heavier as it grows more independent. In the same way the physical body hardens from the whole structure of the four principles of the human being. It shrinks, though only to an insignificant degree. This must be taken quite literally. It shrinks together, in a certain sense. Now you must not picture this too intensely, the student need not fear that through his theosophical development he will grow very wrinkled. This shrivelling is an inward densification. But through this the body is really felt as something harder to bear than it was before. It is felt as being less mobile than before. On the other hand the other principles are more flexible. The pupil feels something that—when he was quite healthy—he never felt before at all; something which he had quite comfortably addressed as ‘I’ he afterwards feels as something within him which seems to have become heavier, and he begins to experience it as a whole. And he becomes especially aware of all those parts in his body which from the beginning, lead, as it were, a certain independent existence. And here we come to a question which can really only be fully understood in this connection. We come to the question of meat-diet—of course, we are not advocating any ‘cause,’ our business is only to present the truth of the matter.

Now, as we are dealing with the physical body, we must describe the nature of animal food, plant food, and food as a whole. This forms an item in the discussion of the influence of theosophical life upon the sheaths of man, which may be described as the perfecting, the regeneration of the physical body from outside, through the external substances he consumes. The relation of man to his food is only properly understood when the relation of man to the other kingdoms of nature, and above all to the plant kingdom, is borne in mind. The plant kingdom, as a kingdom of life, carries the inorganic substances, the lifeless substances, to a certain stage of organisation. In order that the living plant may develop, the lifeless substances must be worked upon in a certain way, as if in a living laboratory, and carried to a certain stage of organisation. In a plant we have a living being which brings the lifeless products of nature to a certain stage of organisation. Now man is so organised physically that he is in a position to take up this process where the plant left it, and to carry it on further from this point, so that the higher human organisation comes into being when man organises further that which the plant has already brought to a certain stage. Things have been so arranged that there is really a perfect continuation when a man plucks an apple or a leaf and eats it. That is the most perfect continuation. If all things were so arranged that the most natural thing could always be done, we might say that man should simply continue the process of organisation where the plant left off, that he should take the organs of the plants which he finds outside him and organise them further within himself. That would be a straight line of organisation which would not be broken through anywhere in any way: from the lifeless substance to the plant up to a certain stage of organisation, and thence to the human organism.

Let us now take the grossest case, when a man eats animal flesh. In an animal we have a living being which carries on the process of organisation further than the plant, it carries it to a certain stage beyond the plant organisation. We may therefore say of the animal that it continues the process of organisation begun by the plant. Let us now suppose that a man eats the animal; what then occurs is, in a sense, as follows: It is not now necessary for the man to exercise the inner forces that he would have had to exercise if he had eaten a plant. If he had been obliged to organise the food from where the plant had left off, he would have had to use certain forces. These forces are not used when he eats animal flesh, for the animal has already carried the organisation of the plant to a certain higher stage, and the man need only begin at this point. Thus we may say that he does not continue the work of organisation from the stage at which he might have done, but he leaves unused forces that are within him, and only continues the organising process from a later stage; he lets the animal do part of the work that he would have had to do if he had eaten the plant food. Now the well-being of an organism does not consist in its doing as little as possible, but in its really bringing all its forces into activity. When a man eats animal flesh he does with the forces which, if he were to eat plant food alone, would develop organic activities, exactly what he would do if he said: ‘I will do without my left arm, I will bind it down so that it cannot be used.’ Thus he fetters his forces within him when he eats animal flesh, forces which he would call upon if he were to eat plant food, and condemns them to inactivity. But, through their condemnation to inactivity, it comes about that the organisations in question which would otherwise be active remain fallow, they are crippled and become hardened. So that when a man eats animal flesh he kills a part of his organism, or at least disables it, This part which thus becomes hardened he carries with him through life as a foreign body. In normal life a man does not feel this foreign body, but when his organism becomes more inwardly mobile, and when his various systems of organs become more independent of one another, as happens in theosophical life, then his physical body, which even without this feels uncomfortable, begins to feel still more uncomfortable, because it now has a foreign body within it. As already mentioned, we are not promulgating any special cause, but are only concerned with presenting the truth; and we shall learn other effects of animal food; we shall go into this subject more minutely in the course of these lectures. Hence it comes about that progress in the inner theosophical life gradually produces a sort of disgust for animal food. It is not necessary to forbid animal food to Theosophists, for the healthy progressing life of instinct gradually turns against animal food, and no longer likes it; and this is much better than becoming a vegetarian from any abstract principle. It is best when Theosophy leads a man to have a sort of disgust and loathing for animal food; and it is not of much use, with respect to what may be called his higher development, if a man gives up animal food for other reasons. So that we may say: Animal food produces in man something that is a burden to his physical body, and this burden is felt. That is the occult fact of the matter looked at from one side.

We shall describe it from a different point of view later on in these lectures. As another example, I might mention alcohol. The relation of man to alcohol also alters when he seriously and earnestly takes up Theosophy. Alcohol is quite a special thing in the kingdoms of nature. It proves itself to be not only a burdensome product in the human organism, but it shows itself positively as producing within it an opposing power. When we observe the plants we find that in their organisation they all reach a certain point, with the exception of the vine, which goes beyond this. That which other plants save up solely for the young germ—that is, all the productive force which is usually saved up only for the young germ and is not poured into the rest of the plant—is in the case of the grape poured in a certain way into the flesh of the fruit as well; so that through what is known as fermentation, the transmutation of that which is thus poured into the grape, of the force already developed to the utmost in the grape itself, something is produced which has actually within the plant a power only comparable occultly to the power which the ego of man has over the blood. Thus what arises in the making of wine, what is always developed in the production of alcohol, is that in another kingdom of nature the same thing is produced as that which a man must produce when he works upon his blood from his ego. You all know the inner connection between the ego and the blood; this is expressed externally by the fact that when shame is felt by the ego, a blush rises to the face, and when fear or anguish is felt by the ego the face grows pale. This usual effect of the ego on the blood is occultly quite similar to the effect which appears when the plant process is reversed, and what is contained in the fruit substance of the bunch of grapes, or generally speaking, that which comes from the plant-nature, is transformed into alcohol. As we have said, the ego must normally produce in the blood—speaking occultly, not chemically—a process very similar to that produced by the reverse process, the retrogression of organisation through the mere chemicalising process when alcohol is produced. The consequence of this is that through alcohol we take into our organism something which from another direction works just as the ego works on the blood. This means that with alcohol we take into ourselves an opposition ego which is a direct opponent of the deeds of our spiritual ego. From the opposite side, the blood is influenced by alcohol precisely as it is influenced by the ego. Thus we kindle an inner war, and in truth we condemn to powerlessness all that proceeds from the ego when we take alcohol, which is its opponent. That is the occult fact. A man who takes no alcohol ensures for himself the power to work freely upon his blood from his ego; one who drinks alcohol is like one who wishes to knock down a wall and beats on one side, at the same time placing people on the other side who beat against him. In exactly the same way, through taking alcohol, the activity of the ego on the blood is eliminated. Hence one who makes Theosophy the element of his life feels the work of alcohol in his blood as a direct battle against his ego, and therefore it is natural that a spiritual development is only easy for him who does not create this opposing condition. From this illustration you will see how that which is also present normally becomes perceptible through the change of equilibrium which comes about in the physical body of the Esotericist or the Theosophist.

In many other respects also do the several organs and systems of organs of the human physical organism become independent; among others, the spinal cord and the brain become much more independent of each other. We shall say more in the next lecture about food, about the occult physiology of nutrition; for the present we will keep rather to the subject of the independence of the organs. The independence of the spinal cord of the brain may become evident, because through filling his soul with Theosophy the student gradually becomes able to feel in his physical body as if this physical organism obtained greater independence within itself. This again may give rise to very uncomfortable situations. Hence it is all the more necessary that one should know these matters. It may occur, for example, that whereas normally one has oneself in hand, as it is called, the more advanced student may suddenly find himself saying several words without really having intended so to do. He goes along the street; suddenly he notices that he has said something which may perhaps be a favourite expression of his, but which he would have refrained from expressing if he had not undergone what is known as the separation of the spinal cord from the brain. What is usually restrained now acts as mere reflex phenomena through the spinal cord becoming independent of the brain.

And in the brain itself certain parts become more independent of the other parts. For example, the inner parts of the brain become more independent of the outer, surrounding ones, while in normal life they work more in harmony. This is manifest in the fact that to the Esotericist or the true Theosophist, abstract thinking becomes more difficult than it was before, and opposition is gradually raised in the brain. As he develops it is easier for the pupil to think in pictures, to conceive of things more through the imagination; it is more difficult to think abstractly. This can very soon be noticed, particularly in ardent Theosophists. They appear to have predilection only for theosophical activity. They now begin to like to read Theosophy and to think on theosophical subjects, not merely because they are ardent Theosophists, but because it is easier for them to think along these more spiritual lines. So far as the physical plane is affected, these more spiritual ideas require the middle parts of the brain, while abstract thinking requires the outer parts; hence the disinclination of many over-ardent Theosophists to abstract thought and abstract science. Hence it is again that some Theosophists notice with some regret that while formerly they were very well able to think abstractedly, this abstract thinking now becomes more difficult. Thus the various organs become relatively more independent, and even certain parts of these organs become more living and independent. You will see from this that something fresh, as it were, must appear in one who experiences this. Formerly it was benevolent Nature which, without his doing, brought his organs into the right connection; now these organs, having grown independent, are more disconnected, he must now have within him the strength to re-establish harmony among them. This is attained in an orderly theosophical training, because all that upholds the lordship of man over his organs which are becoming independent is continually emphasised. Therefore, remember, my dear theosophical friends, why in our literature such a great role is played by something which many people simply describe by saying, ‘Oh! but it is so frightfully difficult.’ I have often had to give a very characteristic answer when I have been told that, ‘for beginners the book Theosophy is really too difficult.’ I have had to say: ‘It must not be easier, because if it had been, people would have taken certain theosophical truths into their souls, which would also have had the effect of making the several parts of the brain independent; but this book is built up as a regular structure of thought, so that thereby the other part of the brain should be brought continually into play, and not be left behind, as it were.’ This is the characteristic feature of a movement resting on an occult basis, not only to pay attention to what in an abstract sense is correct and simply impart this in any way one pleases, but it is essential to impart it in a sound and healthy way, and honourably guard against these matters being made known for the sake of popularity in such a way that they may do harm. In Theosophy it is not merely a matter of imparting certain truths in books and lectures, but it does matter how they are written and how they are imparted. And it is all the better if those who wish to be the vehicle of such a movement do not allow themselves to be turned aside from carrying out this rule for the sake of popularity. In Theosophy, more than in any other realm of thought, the point in question is the acknowledgment of pure and honest truth. And the very going into such a question as the change in the human sheaths through theosophical life makes us observe how necessary it is to bring Theosophy before the world in the right way. I might remark that these lectures are to be taken as a whole, and hence many difficulties that may arise in various souls with respect to what has been said in this first lecture will be smoothed out later.

Erster Vortrag

Ich werde Ihnen zu sprechen haben, meine lieben Freunde, über ein Thema, welches vielen in der Gegenwart wichtig sein kann, allen denjenigen wichtig sein kann, welche in irgendeiner Weise so streben, daß sie Geisteswissenschaft nicht nur zu einer Theorie machen, sondern sie in ihr Herz und Gemüt aufnehmen, so daß sie ihnen ein wirklicher Lebensinhalt wird; daß sie etwas wird, was einfließt in ihr ganzes Menschheitsdasein als Menschen der Gegenwart.

Nicht nur für den eigentlichen Esoteriker, sondern für jeden, der anthroposophische Gedanken in seine Seelenkräfte aufnehmen will, wird wichtig sein, einiges zu erfahren über die Veränderungen, die die ganze menschliche Wesenheit dadurch erfährt, daß entweder der Mensch solche Übungen ausführt, wie sie in meiner Schrift «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» mitgeteilt sind, oder wie sie kurz zusammengestellt sind in dem zweiten Teile meiner «Geheimwissenschaft», oder auch daß der Mensch einfach, aber mit Herz und Gemüt anthroposophische Gedanken zu seinen eigenen macht. Anthroposophie, esoterisch getrieben oder exoterisch, aber ernst getrieben, bewirkt einfach gewisse Veränderungen in der Gesamtorganisation des Menschen. Man wird - das darf kühnlich behauptet werden - ein anderer Mensch durch Anthroposophie, man verwandelt sein ganzes Menschheitsgefüge. Sowohl der physische Leib wie der ätherische, wie der astralische Leib, wie das eigentliche Selbst des Menschen werden in einer gewissen Weise dadurch verwandelt, daß der Mensch Anthroposophie wirklich in sein Inneres aufnimmt. Und der Reihe nach sollen besprochen werden die Veränderungen, welche diese menschlichen Hüllen unter dem Einflusse der Esoterik oder aber der exoterisch ernst getriebenen Anthroposophie erfahren.

Besonders schwierig ist es ja, über die Veränderungen des physischen Menschenleibes zu sprechen, aus dem einfachen Grunde, weil diese Veränderungen des physischen Menschenleibes im Anfang des anthroposophischen oder esoterischen Lebens zwar wichtige, bedeutungsvolle sind, aber in einer gewissen Weise auch oft undeutlich, geringfügig zu nennen sind. Wichtige, bedeutungsvolle Veränderungen gehen mit dem physischen Leib vor sich, aber sie sind doch äußerlich, für irgendein äußeres Wissen nicht bemerkbar. Sie können auch nicht bemerkbar sein aus dem einfachen Grunde, weil das Physische dasjenige ist, was der Mensch von innen heraus am allerwenigsten in seiner Gewalt hat, und weil sogleich Gefahren kommen würden, wenn esoterische Übungen oder anthroposophischer Betrieb so eingerichtet würden, daß der physische Leib Veränderungen erfährt, die über das Maß dessen hinausgehen, was der Mensch voll zu beherrschen in der Lage ist. Innerhalb gewisser Grenzen halten sich die Veränderungen des physischen Leibes; aber es ist doch wichtig, daß der Mensch etwas davon erfährt, daß er sie sich klarmachen kann.

Soll man zunächst mit einem zusammenfassenden Worte die Veränderungen bezeichnen, die der physische Menschenleib erfährt durch die angedeuteten Bedingungen, so muß man sagen: Dieser physische Menschenleib wird in sich zunächst beweglicher und innerlich lebendiger. Beweglicher, was heißt das? Nun, im normalen Menschenleben haben wir den physischen Menschenleib so vor uns, daß seine einzelnen Organe miteinander in Kommunikation stehen, daß seine einzelnen Organe in gewisser Weise miteinander verbunden sind. Die Wirkungen der einzelnen Organe gehen ineinander über. Dadurch, daß der Mensch Esoterik oder Anthroposophie ernsthaft auf sich wirken läßt, werden die einzelnen Organe selbständiger, unabhängiger voneinander. Alle einzelnen Organe werden voneinander unabhängiger. In einer gewissen Weise wird das Gesamtleben des physischen Leibes herabgedämpft und das Eigenleben der Organe verstärkt. Wenn auch der Grad der Herabdämpfung des Gesamtlebens und der Verstärkung des Eigenlebens der Organe ein ungeheuer geringer ist, so muß man doch sagen: Durch den Einfluß von Esoterik und Anthroposophie überhaupt wird das Herz, das Gehirn, das Rückenmark, werden alle Organe selbständiger und lebendiger und unabhängiger voneinander, innerlich beweglicher. Wenn ich gelehrt sprechen wollte, müßte ich sagen: Es gehen die Organe aus einem stabilen Gleichgewichtszustand in einen mehr labilen Gleichgewichtszustand über. Diese Tatsache ist aus dem Grunde gut zu wissen, weil der Mensch sehr leicht geneigt ist, wenn er etwas wahrnimmt von diesem anderen Gleichgewichtszustand seiner Organe, es dem Umstand zuzuschreiben, daß er unpäßlich oder krank geworden ist. Er ist nicht gewohnt, so zu empfinden die Beweglichkeit, die Unabhängigkeit der Organe. Man verspürt, empfindet Organe nur dann, wenn sie anders funktionieren, als der normale Zustand ist. Nun empfindet man, wenn auch zunächst in einer sehr gelinden Weise, das Unabhängigwerden der Organe voneinander; man kann das für ein Unpäßlichwerden, für ein Erkranken halten. Sie sehen also, wie man, gerade wenn es auf den physischen Menschenleib ankommt, vorsichtig sein muß: Selbstverständlich kann dieselbe Sache einmal eine Erkrankung sein, ein anderes Mal eine bloße Begleiterscheinung des inneren anthroposophischen Lebens. Daher hat man in jedem Fall notwendig, individuell zu unterscheiden; aber gesagt muß werden, daß dasjenige, was hier erreicht wird durch das anthroposophische Leben, durchaus etwas ist, was ganz im normalen Entwicklungslauf der Menschheit ohnedies liegt. In älteren Zeiten der Menschheitsentwicklung waren die einzelnen Organe noch mehr voneinander abhängig, als sie es jetzt im äußeren Leben sind, und in der Zukunft werden sie immer unabhängiger werden. So wie derjenige, der sich zur Anthroposophie bekennt, immer auf den verschiedensten Gebieten des Lebens und Erkennens gewissermaßen vorausnehmen muß spätere, erst in der Zukunft an die gesamte Menschheit herantretende Entwicklungsstufen, so muß er auch diese Entwicklungsstufe sozusagen sich gefallen lassen, daß seine Organe voneinander unabhängiger werden. Das kann sich in einer leisen, gelinden Art ausdrücken in den einzelnen Organen und Organsystemen.

Ich will ein besonderes Beispiel anführen. Sie kennen alle die Erscheinung, daß der Mensch, namentlich wenn er bodenständig ist, wenn er also nicht durch seinen Beruf etwa viel reist, in einer gewissen Weise zusammengewachsen ist mit seinem Boden. Gehen Sie aufs Land zu den Landleuten, da werden Sie erfahren, daß noch in einem viel höheren Maße als bei der heutigen Stadtbevölkerung, die ja vielfach Landaufenthalte aufsucht, die Leute mit ihrem Boden, mit ihrem Klima zusammengewachsen sind und daß sie es schwer haben, wenn sie durch dieses oder jenes in eine andere Gegend oder in ein anderes Klima versetzt werden, sich zu akklimatisieren, wie man das nennt; daß bis in die Seele herein in Form von einem oftmals unüberwindlichen Heimweh die Sehnsucht nach dem Boden, mit dem sie zusammengewachsen sind, in der Seele lebt. Das soll uns nur darauf hinweisen, wie der Mensch notwendig hat - was wir auch sonst bemerken können, wenn er in eine andere Gegend kommt -, seinen ganzen Organismus anzupassen an diese Gegend, an dieses Klima. In unserem normalen Leben findet nun tatsächlich die Anpassung statt innerhalb des gesamten menschlichen Organismus. Alles wird in gewisser Weise affiziert, in Mitleidenschaft gezogen, wenn wir aus der Ebene ins Gebirge uns versetzen, wenn wir in eine etwas entfernte Gegend uns versetzen. Bei dem Esoteriker oder bei dem mit Ernst die Anthroposophie Treibenden tritt das merkbar ein, daß nun nicht mehr der ganze Organismus in Mitleidenschaft gezogen wird, sondern daß sich das Blutsystem absondert und daß die Blutzirkulation sich gleichsam heraussondert von dem übrigen Organismus und die Blutzirkulation den größeren Einfluß erfährt, wenn der Mensch von einer Gegend in die andere übergeht. Und wer sich für diese Sache eine gewisse Sensitivität aneignet, der kann bemerken, daß in der Tat an der Pulsation seines Blutes, an der Art, wie sein Puls schlägt, bemerkbar ist, wenn er einfach durch eine Reise von einem Ort in einen anderen sich versetzt. Während bei dem Menschen, der nicht durch Esoterik oder anthroposophisches Leben sozusagen imprägniert ist, das Nervensystem noch stark in Anspruch genommen wird durch die notwendige Akklimatisierung, wird bei dem, der sich mit Esoterik oder ernstem anthroposophischem Leben durchdringt, das Nervensystem sehr wenig in Anspruch genommen werden; es tritt zurück, es sondert sich der innige Verband zwischen dem Nerven- und Blutsystem durch das anthroposophische Innenleben voneinander, und es wird das Blutsystem in einer gewissen Weise sensitiver für die Einflüsse von Klima und Boden, dafür das Nervensystem unabhängiger.

Wenn Sie für eine solche Sache Beweise haben wollen, so müssen Sie diese Beweise in der natürlichsten Weise suchen, in der sie zu finden sind: nämlich dann, wenn Sie selber in eine ähnliche Lage sich versetzt fühlen, wenn Sie selber an einen andern Ort kommen. Versuchen Sie auf sich zu achten, dann werden Sie sehen, daß Sie diese Tatsache des Okkultismus bewahrheitet finden. Es ist außerordentlich wichtig, eine solche Tatsache ins Auge zu fassen, einfach aus dem Grunde, weil diese Tatsache sich allmählich ausbildet zu einer ganz bestimmten Empfindungsfähigkeit. An seinem Blut bemerkt derjenige, der in seinem Herzen Anthroposoph geworden ist, den Charakter einer fremden Stadt. Er braucht gar nicht viel auf anderes einzugehen: an seinem Blut kann er es schon bemerken, wie die Gegenden der Erde voneinander verschieden sind. Dagegen sondert sich wiederum das Nervensystem in einer anderen Weise heraus aus dem gesamten Organismus. Derjenige, der sich mit Anthroposophie unter den angegebenen Bedingungen durchdringt, wird nach und nach bemerken, daß er zum Beispiel den Unterschied der vier Jahreszeiten, namentlich den Unterschied von Sommer und Winter, noch in einer ganz anderen Weise empfindet als der sonstige normale Mensch der Gegenwart. Der normale Mensch der Gegenwart fühlt an seinem eigenen physischen Leibe eigentlich im Grunde genommen zumeist doch nur den Temperaturunterschied. Derjenige, der in der angedeuteten Weise Anthroposophie zu seinem Seeleninhalt gemacht hat, der empfindet nicht nur den Temperaturunterschied, sondern getrennt davon hat er noch ein besonderes Erleben in seinem Nervensystem, so daß es ihm zum Beispiel leichter wird, gewisse Gedanken, die an das physische Gehirn gebunden sind, im Sommer zu fassen als im Winter. Nicht als ob es unmöglich wäre, im Winter diese oder jene Gedanken zu fassen; aber man kann deutlich erfahren, daß es im Sommer leichter ist als im Winter, daß sie im Sommer sozusagen leichter fließen als im Winter. Man kann auch bemerken, daß im Winter die Gedanken leichter abstrakt und im Sommer leichter bildhaft, anschaulicher werden. Das kommt davon her, daß das Werkzeug für den physischen Plan, das Nervensystem, in feiner Weise mitschwingt mit der Veränderung der Jahreszeiten, innerlich unabhängiger vom Gesamtorganismus mitschwingt, als das sonst der Fall ist.

Eine Grundveränderung aber in dem physischen Menschenleib ist dieses, daß man überhaupt beginnt - was recht bedenkliche Gestalten annehmen kann -, seinen physischen Leib stärker zu fühlen als vorher; er wird gewissermaßen empfindlicher für das Seelendasein, er wird schwerer erträglich. Es ist außerordentlich schwierig, sich das ganz klar zu machen, wenn dies auseinandergesetzt werden soll; allein stellen Sie sich vor ein Glas, in dem Wasser ist und in dem wäre aufgelöst Salz, so daß das eine trübe Flüssigkeit gäbe. Nehmen Sie an - für den normalen Zustand des Menschen - seinen Ätherleib, Astralleib und sein Selbst wie die Flüssigkeit, und der physische Leib sei darin aufgelöst wie das Salz. Jetzt lassen wir die Flüssigkeit hier im Glase etwas abkühlen. Da wird das Salz sich langsam herausverhärten, wird schwerer dadurch, daß es selbständiger wird. So verhärtet sich heraus aus dem gesamten Gefüge der vier Glieder der menschlichen Wesenheit der physische Leib; er schrumpft ein, wenn auch in geringfügigem Maße. Das ist durchaus wörtlich zu nehmen. Er schrumpft in einer gewissen Weise ein. Nur müssen Sie sich das nicht stark vorstellen, so daß man nicht zu fürchten hat, daß der Mensch durch anthroposophische Entwicklung die allerstärksten Runzeln bekommt. Dieses Einschrumpfen ist ein In-sich-dichter-Werden. Dadurch aber zeigt er sich eigentlich erst als etwas, woran man schwerer zu tragen hat als vorher. Man empfindet ihn unbeweglicher als vorher. Dazu kommt, daß die anderen Glieder nun leichter beweglich sind. So empfindet man das, was man vorher eigentlich, wenn es ganz gesund war, gar nicht empfunden hat an sich, wozu man ganz behaglich Ich gesagt hat, das empfindet man nachher als etwas, was man wie schwerer geworden an sich trägt, was man anfängt zu verspüren in seiner Gänze. Und insbesondere fängt man an, in seinem Leibe alle diejenigen Einschlüsse zu verspüren, welche sozusagen innerhalb dieses physischen Leibes ein gewisses, von vornherein selbständiges Dasein führen. Und hier kommen wir auf eine Frage, die eigentlich nur in diesem Zusammenhang zum vollen Verständnis gebracht werden kann - aber selbstverständlich wird damit keine Agitation getrieben, sondern nur die Wahrheit hingestellt -, wir kommen auf die Frage der Fleischkost.

Da müssen wir uns einmal, weil wir es hier mit dem physischen Leib zu tun haben, einlassen auf die Beschreibung des Wesens der Fleisch- und auch der Pflanzennahrung, der Nahrung überhaupt. Das alles soll eine Episode bilden bei der Besprechung der Einflüsse anthroposophischen Lebens auf die Hüllen des Menschen, was so charakterisiert werden kann, daß es genannt wird die Ergänzung, die Regeneration dieses physischen Leibes von außen herein durch das, was er an äußerer Substanz aufnimmt. Man versteht das Verhältnis des Menschen zu seinen Nahrungsmitteln dann recht, wenn man das Verhältnis des Menschen zu den übrigen Naturreichen, zunächst zum Pflanzenreich ins Auge faßt. Das Pflanzenreich, als ein Reich des Lebens, führt die anorganischen Stoffe, die leblosen Stoffe bis zu einer gewissen Organisation herauf. Daß die lebendige Pflanze werde, das setzt voraus, daß die leblosen Stoffe in einer gewissen Weise - wie eben in einem lebendigen Laboratorium - verarbeitet werden bis zu einer gewissen Stufe der Organisation herauf. So daß wir in der Pflanze ein Lebewesen vor uns haben, welches die leblosen Naturprodukte bis zu einer gewissen Stufe der Organisation bringt. Der Mensch ist nun so organisiert als physischer Organismus, daß er in der Lage ist, den Organisationsprozeß da aufzunehmen, bis wohin die Pflanze ihn gebracht hat, und dann ihn von dem Punkte an weiterzuführen, so daß der höhere Menschen-organismus entsteht, wenn der Mensch das, was die Pflanze bis zu einem gewissen Grade organisiert hat, weiterorganisiert. Es verhalten sich die Dinge ganz genau so, daß dann eigentlich eine vollständige Kontinuation da ist, wenn der Mensch einen Apfel oder ein Baumblatt abpflückt und ißt. Das ist die vollständigste Kontinuation. Würden alle Dinge so vorliegen, daß immer das Allernatürlichste könnte getan werden, so würde man sagen können: Das Natürlichste wäre, daß der Mensch einfach den Organisationsprozeß da fortsetzt, wo ihn die Pflanze stehengelassen hat, das heißt die Pflanzenorgane so nimmt, wie sie sich draußen darbieten, und von da aus in sich selber weiterorganisiert. Das würde eine gerade Linie der Organisation geben, die nirgends irgendwie durchbrochen wäre: von der leblosen Substanz bis zur Pflanze, bis zu einem gewissen Punkt der Organisation, und von diesem Punkt bis zum menschlichen Organismus hindurch. Nehmen wir nun gleich das Gröbste: der Mensch genießt das Tier. Im Tier haben wir ein Lebewesen vor uns, welches den Organisationsprozeß auch schon weiterführt als die Pflanze, bis zu einem gewissen Punkte über die Pflanzenorganisation hinausführt. So daß wir von dem Tiere sagen können, es setzt den Organisationsprozeß der Pflanze fort.

Nehmen wir nun an, der Mensch ißt das Tier. Da tritt in einer gewissen Weise das Folgende ein: der Mensch hat jetzt nicht nötig, das an inneren Kräften anzuwenden, was er hätte anwenden müssen bei der Pflanze. Hätte er da angefangen, die Nahrungsmittel organisieren zu müssen, wo die Pflanze aufgehört hat, dann hätte er eine gewisse Summe von Kräften anwenden müssen. Die bleibt nun ungenützt, wenn er das Tier ißt; denn das Tier hat die Organisation der Pflanze schon bis zu einem gewissen höheren Punkte heraufgeführt; erst da braucht der Mensch jetzt anzufangen. Wir können also sagen: Der Mensch setzt nicht die Organisation da fort, wo er sie fortsetzen könnte, sondern er läßt Kräfte, die in ihm sind, ungenützt und setzt später die Organisation fort; er läßt sich von dem Tiere einen Teil der Arbeit abnehmen, den er leisten müßte, wenn er die Pflanze genießen würde. Nun besteht das Wohlsein eines Organismus nicht darin, daß er möglichst wenig leistet, sondern darin, daß er alle seine Kräfte wirklich in Tätigkeit bringt. Wenn der Mensch tierische Nahrung zu sich nimmt, so macht er mit denjenigen Kräften, welche organische Tätigkeiten entwickeln würden, wenn er nur Pflanzen äße, etwas ähnliches, wie wenn er auf seinen linken Arm verzichten würde, ihn anbinden würde, so daß er nicht benützt werden kann. So bindet der Mensch, wenn er Tiere ißt, innere Kräfte an, die er sonst aufrufen würde, wenn er nur Pflanzen äße. Er verurteilt also eine gewisse Summe von Kräften in sich zur Untätigkeit. Alles, was so zur Untätigkeit im menschlichen Organismus verurteilt wird, bewirkt zugleich, daß die betreffenden Organisationen, welche sonst tätig wären, brachgelegt werden, gelähmt, verhärtet werden. So daß der Mensch einen Teil seines Organismus tötet oder wenigstens lähmt, wenn er das Tier genießt. Diesen Teil seines Organismus, den der Mensch so in sich verhärtet, den trägt er dann mit durch das Leben wie einen Fremdkörper. Diesen Fremdkörper fühlt er im normalen Leben nicht. Wenn aber der Organismus so innerlich beweglich wird und seine Organsysteme voneinander unabhängiger werden, so wie es im anthroposophischen Leben geschieht, dann beginnt der physische Leib, der ohnedies schon, wie wir charakterisiert haben, sich unbehaglich fühlt, sich noch unbehaglicher zu fühlen, weil er ja jetzt einen Fremdkörper in sich hat.

Wie gesagt, es soll nicht agitiert, sondern nur die Wahrheit an sich hingestellt werden. Und wir werden andere Wirkungen der tierischen Nahrung noch kennenlernen; wir werden diesmal genötigt sein, dieses Kapitel ausführlich zu besprechen. Daher also kommt es, daß Fortschritt .an innerem anthroposophischem Leben allmählich eine Art von Ekel erzeugt an tierischer Nahrung. Nicht als ob man dem Anthroposophen die tierische Nahrung verbieten müßte; sondern das gesund fortschreitende Instinktieben wehrt sich nach und nach gegen die tierische Nahrung und mag sie auch nicht mehr; und das ist auch viel besser, als wenn der Mensch aus irgendeinem abstrakten Grundsatz heraus Vegetarier wird. Das beste ist, wenn die Anthroposophie den Menschen dazu bringt, eine Art Ekel und Abscheu vor der Fleischnahrung zu haben, und es hat nicht viel Wert in bezug auf das, was man seine höhere Entwicklung nennen kann, wenn der Mensch auf andere Weise sich die Fleischnahrung abgewöhnt. So daß man sagen kann: Die tierische Nahrung bewirkt in dem Menschen etwas, was für den physischen Leib des Menschen eine Last wird, und diese Last wird empfunden. Das ist der okkulte Tatbestand von einer Seite.

Von einer anderen Seite werden wir ihn noch charakterisieren. Ich möchte als anderes Beispiel noch den Alkohol erwähnen. Auch das Verhältnis des Menschen zum Alkohol ist einer Veränderung unterworfen, wenn der Mensch sich innerlich lebendig, ernst mit Anthroposophie durchdringt. Der Alkohol nämlich ist ja etwas noch ganz Besonderes sozusagen in den Reichen der Natur. Er erweist sich nicht nur als eine Last-Erzeugung im menschlichen Organismus, sondern er erweist sich direkt als oppositionelle Gewalt im menschlichen Organismus erzeugend. Denn wenn wir die Pflanze betrachten, so bringt sie es in ihrer Organisation bis zu einem gewissen Punkt - mit Ausnahme der Weinrebe, die es über diesen Punkt hinausbringt. Was die übrigen Pflanzen sich einzig und allein aufsparen für den jungen Keim, alle die Triebkraft, die sonst nur für den jungen Keim aufgespart wird und nicht in das übrige der Pflanze sich ergießt, das ergießt sich bei der Weintraube auch in einer gewissen Weise in das Fruchtfleisch; so daß durch die sogenannte Gärung, durch die Verwandlung dessen, was sich da in die Weintraube hineinergießt, was in der Traube selbst zur höchsten Spannung gebracht worden ist, etwas erzeugt wird, was in der Tat innerhalb der Pflanze eine Gewalt hat, welche nur verglichen werden kann okkultistisch mit der Gewalt, die das Ich des Menschen über das Blut hat. Was also bei der Weinerzeugung entsteht, was bei der Alkoholerzeugung sich immer bildet, ist, daß in einem anderen Naturreich dasjenige erzeugt wird, was der Mensch erzeugen muß, wenn er von seinem Ich aus auf das Blut wirkt.

Wir wissen ja, daß eine innige Beziehung besteht zwischen dem Ich und dem Blut. Sie kann schon äußerlich charakterisiert werden dadurch, daß wenn im Ich Scham empfunden wird, die Schamröte dem Menschen ins Gesicht steigt, wenn in dem Ich Furcht, Angst empfunden wird, der Mensch erblaßt. Diese Wirkung von dem Ich auf das Blut, die aber auch sonst vorhanden ist, die ist okkultistisch ganz ähnlich derjenigen Wirkung, welche entsteht, wenn der Pflanzenprozeß zurückgebildet wird, so daß das, was in dem Fruchtfleisch der Weintraube ist oder was überhaupt aus dem Pflanzlichen kommt, zum Alkohol umgebildet wird. Das Ich muß, wie gesagt, normal einen ganz ähnlichen Prozeß im Blut erzeugen - okkultistisch gesprochen, nicht chemisch -, wie erzeugt wird durch das gleichsam Rückgängigmachen des Organisationsprozesses, durch das bloße Chemischmachen des Organisationsprozesses, wenn Alkohol erzeugt wird. Die Folge davon ist, daß wir durch den Alkohol etwas in unseren Organismus einführen, was von der anderen Seite her so wirkt, wie das Ich auf das Blut wirkt. Das heißt, wir haben ein Gegen-Ich in dem Alkohol in uns aufgenommen, ein Ich, das direkt ein Kämpfer ist gegen die Taten unseres geistigen Ich. Von der anderen Seite her wird auf das Blut gerade so gewirkt durch den Alkohol, wie von dem Ich auf das Blut gewirkt wird. So daß wir also einen inneren Krieg entfesseln und im Grunde alles das, was von dem Ich ausgeht, zur Machtlosigkeit verdammen, wenn wir ihm einen Gegenkämpfer entgegenstellen im Alkohol. Dies ist der okkulte Tatbestand. Derjenige, welcher keinen Alkohol trinkt, sichert sich die freie Möglichkeit, von seinem Ich aus auf das Blur zu wirken; derjenige, der Alkohol trinkt, der macht es gerade so wie jemand, der eine Wand einreißen will und nach der einen Seite schlägt, gleichzeitig aber auf der anderen Seite Leute aufstellt, die ihm entgegenschlagen. Ganz genau so wird durch den Genuß des Alkohols eliminiert die Tätigkeit des Ich auf das Blut.

Daher empfindet derjenige, welcher Anthroposophie zu seinem Lebenselement macht, die Arbeit des Alkohols im Blute als direkten Kampf gegen sein Ich, und es ist daher nur natürlich, daß eine wirkliche geistige Entwicklung nur leicht vor sich gehen kann, wenn man ihr nicht diese Widerlage schafft. Wir sehen gerade aus diesem Beispiel, wie das, was ja sonst auch vorhanden ist, durch das veränderte Gleichgewicht, welches eintritt im physischen Leib, für den Esoteriker oder Anthroposophen wahrnehmbar wird.

Auch in vielen anderen Beziehungen verselbständigen sich die einzelnen Organe und Organsysteme des menschlichen physischen Organismus, und diese Verselbständigung können wir auch dadurch kennzeichnen, daß Rückenmark und Gehirn viel unabhängiger voneinander werden. Wir werden von der Nahrung, von der okkulten Nahrungsphysiologie morgen noch weiterreden; ich will aber heute mehr bei dem Thema der Verselbständigung bleiben. Diese Unabhängigkeit des Rückenmarkes vom Gehirn kann dadurch zutage treten, daß in der Tat durch eine innere Durchdringung der Seele mit Anthroposophie nach und nach der Mensch in die Lage kommt, an seinem physischen Leibe zu empfinden, als ob dieser physische Organismus an sich größere Selbständigkeit gewänne. Das kann wiederum ganz unbehagliche Situationen geben. Daher ist es um so notwendiger, daß man die Sache weiß. Es kann sich zum Beispiel herausstellen, daß, während man sich sonst in der Gewalt hat, wie man das so gewöhnlich nennt, derjenige, der weiterkommt, an sich plötzlich merkt, wie er manche Worte sagt, ohne daß er so recht die Absicht hatte, diese Worte zu sagen. Er geht auf der Straße; plötzlich merkt er, daß er ein Wort ausgesprochen hat, das vielleicht ein Lieblingswort von ihm ist, das er unterlassen hätte auszusprechen, wenn er nicht jene Verselbständigung durchgemacht hätte, die man diejenige des Rückenmarkes gegenüber dem Gehirn nennt. Was sonst gehemmt wird, das wird zu bloßen Reflexerscheinungen durch die Verselbständigung des Rückenmarkes gegenüber dem Gehirn. Aber im Gehirn selber wird ein Teil verselbständigt gegenüber dem andern Teil: nämlich die inneren Partien des Gehirns werden selbständiger gegenüber den äußeren umlagernden Partien, während diese letzteren mehr mit den inneren Partien zusammenarbeiten im normalen Leben. Das zeigt sich dadurch, daß für den Esoteriker oder wirklichen Anthroposophen das abstrakte Denken schwerer wird, schwieriger wird, als es vorher war, an dem Gehirn allmählich einen Widerstand findet. Bildlich zu denken, mehr sozusagen sich imaginativ vorzustellen, das wird leichter bei dem sich entwickelnden Anthroposophen, als daß er abstrakt denkt.

Das ist etwas, was bei manchem besonders eifrigen Anthroposophen sogar sehr bald leicht bemerkbar wird. Es stellt sich eine Vorliebe für nur anthroposophische Betätigung ein. Die Leute fangen an, nur mehr Anthroposophisches gerne zu lesen und zu denken, nicht bloß aus dem Grunde, weil sie eifrige Anthroposophen sind, sondern weil es ihnen leichter wird, sich in diese mehr spirituellen Vorstellungen hineinzufinden, welche, soweit der physische Plan in Betracht kommt, die mittleren Partien des Gehirns beanspruchen, während das abstrakte Denken die äußeren Partien des Gehirns beansprucht. Daher kommt die Abneigung gerade manches übereifrigen Anthroposophen gegenüber abstraktem Denken und abstrakter Wissenschaft. Daher kommt es auch wiederum, daß einzelne Anthroposophen mit einer gewissen Wehmut bemerken, wie sie früher gut abstrakt haben denken können und wie gerade dieses abstrakte Denken anfängt schwieriger zu werden.

So werden die einzelnen Organe in sich lebendiger und selbständiger, und sogar einzelne Organteile werden lebendiger und selbständiger. Sie können daraus ersehen, daß sozusagen etwas Neues eintreten muß bei dem Menschen, der solches durchmacht. Früher war es eine gütige Natur, die ohne sein Zutun seine Organe in die richtige Verbindung gebracht hat; jetzt werden diese Organe selbständiger, kommen in ein unabhängiges Verhältnis zueinander. Jetzt muß er mehr von innen heraus die Kraft haben, die Organe wirklich wiederum zu einer Harmonie aufzurufen. Dieses Aufrufen der Organe und Organteile zu einer Harmonie erreicht man dadurch, daß bei jedem ordentlichen Betreiben des Anthroposophischen alles das immerfort betont wird, was die Herrschaft des Menschen über seine selbständiger gewordenen Organe erhöht. Warum spielt eigentlich innerhalb unserer Literatur etwas eine so große Rolle, wovon manche Menschen einfach sagen: Ach, das ist aber doch furchtbar schwierig! - Ich mußte schon oft eine sehr eigentümliche Antwort geben, wenn gesagt wurde: Für Anfänger ist das Buch «Theosophie» doch eigentlich zu schwierig. - Ich mußte sagen: Es durfte nicht leichter sein. Hätte man es leichter gemacht, so hätten die Leute zwar gewisse anthroposophische Wahrheiten in ihr Inneres aufgenommen, die wirken, auch zur Verselbständigung der einzelnen Gehirnpartien; aber es ist dieses Buch in einer ordentlichen Gedankenstruktur konstruiert, damit auch die andere Partie des Gehirns fortwährend genötigt ist, wirklich sich zu üben, nicht sozusagen zurückzubleiben. Das ist das Eigentümliche, das bei einer solchen Bewegung, die auf einer okkulten Grundlage beruht, notwendig macht, nicht nur zu achten auf das, was im abstrakten Sinn das Richtige ist, und das einfach zu verkündigen in jeder beliebigen Weise; sondern es ist notwendig, es in einer gesunden Weise zu verkündigen und in ehrlichster Weise darauf zu achten, daß nicht um der Popularität willen die Sache so verkündet wird, daß sie in ihrer Verkündigung zugleich zum Schaden gereichen könne. In der Anthroposophie kommt es nicht bloß darauf an, daß die entsprechenden Wahrheiten in Büchern und in Reden mitgeteilt werden, sondern es kommt darauf an, wie sie geschrieben und wie sie mitgeteilt werden. Und um so besser ist es, wenn diejenigen, die sich zum Träger einer solchen Bewegung machen wollen, sich nicht um der Popularität willen abhalten lassen, dies oder jenes durchzuführen. Mehr als auf jedem anderen Gebiete handelt es sich auf diesem um das Bekenntnis zur reinen und ehrlichen Wahrheit. Und gerade wenn man auf solche Fragen eingeht wie die Veränderung der menschlichen Hülle durch anthroposophisches Leben, da bemerkt man erst, wie notwendig es ist, Anthroposophie in richtiger Weise vor die Welt zu bringen.

Ich möchte nur bemerken, daß die Vorträge, die ich halten werde, als ein Ganzes zu nehmen sind und daß daher manches Bedenkliche, was beim ersten Vortrag in dieser oder jener Seele auftreten könnte, schon behoben werden wird.

First Lecture

I will speak to you, my dear friends, on a subject that may be important to many at present, important to all those who in some way strive not only to make spiritual science a theory, but to take it into their hearts and minds so that it becomes a real content of their lives; so that it becomes something that flows into their entire human existence as people of the present.

It will be important not only for esotericists proper, but for everyone who wants to take anthroposophical ideas into their soul forces, to learn something about the changes that the whole human being undergoes when either the human being carries out exercises such as those described in my book How to Know Higher Worlds or as they are briefly summarized in the second part of my “Secret Science,” or simply by making anthroposophical ideas their own with heart and soul. Anthroposophy, whether pursued esoterically or exoterically, but pursued seriously, simply brings about certain changes in the overall organization of the human being. One becomes — it can be boldly asserted — a different person through anthroposophy; one transforms one's entire human constitution. Both the physical body and the etheric body, as well as the astral body and the actual self of the human being, are transformed in a certain way when the human being truly takes anthroposophy into their inner being. And we will discuss in turn the changes that these human shells undergo under the influence of esotericism or of seriously pursued exoteric anthroposophy.

It is particularly difficult to speak about the changes in the physical human body, for the simple reason that these changes are important and significant at the beginning of an anthroposophical or esoteric life, but in a certain sense they are often unclear and insignificant. Important, significant changes take place in the physical body, but they are external and not perceptible to any external knowledge. They cannot be perceived for the simple reason that the physical is that part of the human being which is least under his control, and because dangers would immediately arise if esoteric exercises or anthroposophical activities were organized in such a way that the physical body underwent changes beyond the measure of what the human being is able to control completely. The changes in the physical body remain within certain limits, but it is nevertheless important that human beings learn something about them, that they can understand them.

If we are to begin by summarizing the changes that the physical human body undergoes under the conditions indicated, we must say that this physical human body first becomes more mobile and more alive internally. More mobile, what does that mean? Well, in normal human life, we have the physical human body before us in such a way that its individual organs communicate with each other, that its individual organs are connected to each other in a certain way. The effects of the individual organs merge into one another. Through the fact that the human being allows esotericism or anthroposophy to work seriously upon him, the individual organs become more independent, more independent of each other. All the individual organs become more independent of each other. In a certain sense, the overall life of the physical body is dampened and the individual life of the organs is strengthened. Even if the degree of dampening of the overall life and the strengthening of the individual life of the organs is extremely small, it must nevertheless be said that Through the influence of esotericism and anthroposophy in general, the heart, the brain, the spinal cord, all organs become more independent and more alive and more independent of each other, more mobile internally. If I wanted to speak in a scholarly manner, I would have to say: The organs pass from a stable state of equilibrium into a more labile state of equilibrium. This fact is good to know because human beings are very easily inclined, when they perceive something of this different state of equilibrium in their organs, to attribute it to the fact that they have become unwell or ill. They are not accustomed to feeling the mobility and independence of their organs. One only feels and perceives organs when they function differently from their normal state. Now, even if only in a very mild way at first, one senses the organs becoming independent of one another; one may mistake this for feeling unwell or falling ill. You see, therefore, how careful one must be when it comes to the physical human body: of course, the same thing can be an illness in one case and merely a side effect of the inner anthroposophical life in another. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish individually in each case; but it must be said that what is achieved here through the anthroposophical life is something that lies entirely within the normal course of human development. In earlier times of human development, the individual organs were even more dependent on each other than they are now in outer life, and in the future they will become increasingly independent. Just as those who profess anthroposophy must always anticipate, in the most diverse areas of life and knowledge, later stages of development that will only come to the whole of humanity in the future, so too must they accept this stage of development, in which their organs become more independent of one another. This can express itself in a quiet, mild way in the individual organs and organ systems.

I will give a specific example. You are all familiar with the phenomenon that human beings, especially if they are down-to-earth, that is, if they do not travel much in their profession, have grown together with their soil in a certain way. Go to the countryside and talk to the country folk, and you will find that, even more so than today's city dwellers, who often seek to spend time in the country, people have grown together with their soil and their climate, and that they find it difficult to acclimatize when they are moved to another region or climate for one reason or another. as it is called; that deep in their souls, in the form of an often insurmountable homesickness, there lives a longing for the soil with which they have grown together. This should only point out to us how necessary it is for human beings—as we can also observe when they come to a different region—to adapt their entire organism to this region, to this climate. In our normal life, this adaptation actually takes place within the entire human organism. Everything is affected in a certain way, affected when we move from the plains to the mountains, when we move to a somewhat distant region. In the case of the esotericist or those who seriously pursue anthroposophy, it becomes noticeable that it is no longer the entire organism that is affected, but that the blood system separates and the blood circulation, as it were, separates itself from the rest of the organism and the blood circulation experiences a greater influence when a person moves from one region to another. And anyone who acquires a certain sensitivity to this matter can notice that it is indeed noticeable in the pulsation of their blood, in the way their pulse beats, when they simply move from one place to another. While in people who are not, so to speak, impregnated with esotericism or anthroposophical life, the nervous system is still heavily engaged in the necessary acclimatization, in those who are permeated with esotericism or serious anthroposophical life, the nervous system is very little engaged; it recedes, the intimate connection between the nervous and circulatory systems is separated by the anthroposophical inner life, and the circulatory system becomes in a certain way more sensitive to the influences of climate and soil, while the nervous system becomes more independent.

If you want proof of such a thing, you must seek this proof in the most natural way in which it can be found: namely, when you find yourself in a similar situation, when you yourself come to a different place. Try to pay attention to yourself, and you will see that this fact of occultism is true. It is extremely important to take such a fact into consideration, simply because this fact gradually develops into a very specific sensitivity. Those who have become anthroposophists in their hearts notice the character of a foreign city in their blood. They do not need to pay much attention to anything else: they can already notice in their blood how the regions of the earth differ from one another. In contrast, the nervous system distinguishes itself from the entire organism in a different way. Those who immerse themselves in anthroposophy under the conditions described will gradually notice that they perceive the difference between the four seasons, especially the difference between summer and winter, in a completely different way than other normal people today. The normal person of today actually feels, in their own physical body, mostly only the difference in temperature. Those who have made anthroposophy part of their soul life in the way indicated not only feel the difference in temperature, but also have a separate experience in their nervous system, so that it becomes easier for them, for example, to grasp certain thoughts that are connected with the physical brain in summer than in winter. It is not that it is impossible to grasp these or those thoughts in winter, but one can clearly experience that it is easier in summer than in winter, that they flow more easily in summer than in winter, so to speak. One can also notice that in winter thoughts become more abstract and in summer more pictorial, more vivid. This comes from the fact that the tool for the physical plane, the nervous system, resonates in a subtle way with the change of the seasons, resonating internally more independently of the whole organism than is otherwise the case.

A fundamental change in the physical human body, however, is that one begins to feel one's physical body more strongly than before, which can take on quite alarming forms; it becomes, so to speak, more sensitive to the soul's existence, more difficult to bear. It is extremely difficult to understand this clearly when it is explained; but imagine a glass containing water with salt dissolved in it, so that the liquid is cloudy. Assume – for the normal state of the human being – that his etheric body, astral body, and self are like the liquid, and that the physical body is dissolved in it like the salt. Now let us allow the liquid in the glass to cool down a little. The salt will slowly harden and become heavier as it becomes more independent. In this way, the physical body hardens out of the entire structure of the four members of the human being; it shrinks, albeit to a slight degree. This is to be taken quite literally. It shrinks in a certain way. But you must not imagine this too strongly, lest you fear that anthroposophical development will cause people to develop the deepest wrinkles. This shrinking is a becoming denser within itself. But this actually makes it appear as something that is more difficult to bear than before. One feels it to be less mobile than before. In addition, the other limbs are now more easily movable. So one feels what one did not actually feel before, when one was completely healthy, what one comfortably referred to as “I,” one feels afterwards as something that has become heavier to bear, something that one begins to feel in its entirety. And in particular, one begins to feel all those inclusions in one's body which, so to speak, lead a certain independent existence within this physical body. And here we come to a question that can only be fully understood in this context — but of course this is not meant to be agitation, only a statement of the truth — we come to the question of meat-eating.

Since we are dealing here with the physical body, we must first describe the nature of meat and plant foods, of food in general. All this is intended to form an episode in the discussion of the influences of anthroposophical life on the human sheaths, which can be characterized as the supplementation, the regeneration of this physical body from outside through what it takes in from external substances. We can understand the relationship between human beings and their food when we consider the relationship between human beings and the other kingdoms of nature, beginning with the plant kingdom. The plant kingdom, as a kingdom of life, raises inorganic substances, lifeless substances, to a certain level of organization. For the living plant to become alive, it is necessary that the lifeless substances be processed in a certain way—as in a living laboratory—up to a certain level of organization. Thus, in the plant we have before us a living being that brings the lifeless products of nature to a certain level of organization. Human beings are organized as physical organisms in such a way that they are able to take up the process of organization up to the point where the plant has brought it, and then continue it from that point, so that the higher human organism arises when human beings further organize what the plant has organized to a certain degree. Things behave in exactly the same way, so that there is actually a complete continuation when a human being picks an apple or a leaf from a tree and eats it. That is the most complete continuation. If all things were such that the most natural thing could always be done, one could say: The most natural thing would be for man simply to continue the organizational process where the plant left off, that is, to take the plant organs as they present themselves outside and continue organizing them within himself. This would result in a straight line of organization that would not be interrupted anywhere: from lifeless substance to the plant, to a certain point of organization, and from this point to the human organism. Let us now take the crudest example: humans enjoy animals. In animals, we have a living being that continues the process of organization further than plants, to a certain point beyond plant organization. So we can say that animals continue the process of organization of plants.

Let us now assume that humans eat animals. In a certain sense, the following occurs: humans now do not need to apply the inner forces that they would have had to apply to plants. If they had had to start organizing food where plants left off, they would have had to apply a certain amount of force. These remain unused when he eats the animal, because the animal has already brought the plant's organization up to a certain higher point; only there does the human being now need to begin. We can therefore say that man does not continue the organization where he could continue it, but leaves forces that are within him unused and continues the organization later; he allows the animal to do part of the work that he would have to do if he were to enjoy the plant. Now, the well-being of an organism does not consist in doing as little as possible, but in actually bringing all its forces into activity. When humans consume animal food, they do something similar with the forces that would develop organic activities if they only ate plants, as if they were giving up their left arm, tying it up so that it cannot be used. Thus, when humans eat animals, they bind up inner forces that they would otherwise call upon if they only ate plants. They therefore condemn a certain amount of their own forces to inactivity. Everything that is thus condemned to inactivity in the human organism also causes the relevant organizations that would otherwise be active to become dormant, paralyzed, and hardened. Thus, when humans enjoy animal food, they kill or at least paralyze a part of their organism. They then carry this part of their organism, which they have hardened within themselves, through life like a foreign body. They do not feel this foreign body in normal life. But when the organism becomes so internally mobile and its organ systems become more independent of each other, as happens in anthroposophical life, then the physical body, which already feels uncomfortable, as we have characterized, begins to feel even more uncomfortable because it now has a foreign body within it.

As I said, this is not meant to be provocative, but simply to state the truth. And we will learn about other effects of animal food; we will be compelled to discuss this chapter in detail at another time. This is why progress in inner anthroposophical life gradually produces a kind of aversion to animal food. It is not that animal food should be forbidden to anthroposophists; but the healthy, progressive instinct gradually rejects animal food and no longer likes it, and that is much better than if people become vegetarians out of some abstract principle. It is best if anthroposophy leads people to feel a kind of disgust and aversion to meat, and it is of little value in terms of what we might call higher development if people give up meat in some other way. So one can say that animal food causes something in humans that becomes a burden on the physical body, and this burden is felt. That is the occult fact from one point of view.

We will characterize it from another side. I would like to mention alcohol as another example. The relationship of human beings to alcohol is also subject to change when people become inwardly alive and seriously imbued with anthroposophy. Alcohol is something very special in the natural world. It not only proves to be a burden on the human organism, but also directly generates oppositional forces within it. If we consider plants, we see that their organization develops to a certain point—with the exception of the grapevine, which goes beyond this point. What the other plants reserve solely for the young germ, all the driving force that is otherwise reserved only for the young germ and does not flow into the rest of the plant, flows in the grape in a certain way into the pulp; so that through the so-called fermentation, through the transformation of what flows into the grape, what has been brought to the highest tension in the grape itself produces something that actually has a power within the plant that can only be compared occultistically with the power that the human ego has over the blood. What arises in wine production, what always forms in alcohol production, is that in another realm of nature, that which the human being must produce when he acts on the blood from his ego is produced.

We know that there is an intimate relationship between the ego and the blood. It can already be characterized externally by the fact that when shame is felt in the ego, the blush of shame rises to the face; when fear or anxiety is felt in the ego, the person turns pale. This effect of the ego on the blood, which is also present in other ways, is occultistically very similar to the effect that arises when the plant process is reversed, so that what is in the pulp of the grape or what comes from the plant in general is transformed into alcohol. As I have said, the ego must normally produce a very similar process in the blood — occultistically speaking, not chemically — as is produced by the reversal of the organizational process, by the mere chemicalization of the organizational process when alcohol is produced. The result of this is that through alcohol we introduce something into our organism that acts from the other side in the same way as the ego acts on the blood. This means that we have taken in a counter-ego in the alcohol, an ego that is directly opposed to the actions of our spiritual ego. From the other side, alcohol acts on the blood in exactly the same way as the ego acts on the blood. So when we oppose the ego with a counterforce in alcohol, we unleash an inner war and basically condemn everything that comes from the ego to powerlessness. This is the occult fact. Those who do not drink alcohol secure for themselves the free opportunity to influence the blood from their ego; those who drink alcohol do exactly the same as someone who wants to tear down a wall and strikes at one side, but at the same time places people on the other side to strike back at him. In exactly the same way, the consumption of alcohol eliminates the activity of the ego on the blood.

Therefore, those who make anthroposophy their life element perceive the work of alcohol in the blood as a direct attack on their ego, and it is therefore only natural that real spiritual development can only proceed easily if this opposition is not created. We see from this example how something that is otherwise present becomes perceptible to the esotericist or anthroposophist through the altered balance that occurs in the physical body.

In many other respects, too, the individual organs and organ systems of the human physical organism become independent, and we can also characterize this independence by the fact that the spinal cord and the brain become much more independent of each other. We will talk more about nutrition and occult nutritional physiology tomorrow, but today I want to stay with the topic of independence. This independence of the spinal cord from the brain can become apparent in that, through an inner permeation of the soul with anthroposophy, the human being gradually comes to feel in his physical body as if this physical organism were gaining greater independence in itself. This, in turn, can lead to very uncomfortable situations. That is why it is all the more necessary to be aware of this fact. It may turn out, for example, that while one is otherwise in control of oneself, as we usually call it, the person who is making progress suddenly notices that he is saying certain words without really intending to say them. He is walking down the street; suddenly he notices that he has uttered a word that is perhaps one of his favorite words, which he would have refrained from saying if he had not undergone that process of becoming independent that is called the independence of the spinal cord from the brain. What is otherwise inhibited becomes mere reflex phenomena through the independence of the spinal cord from the brain. But within the brain itself, one part becomes independent of the other: namely, the inner parts of the brain become more independent of the outer surrounding parts, while the latter cooperate more with the inner parts in normal life. This is evident in the fact that abstract thinking becomes more difficult for the esotericist or true anthroposophist, gradually encountering resistance in the brain. Thinking figuratively, imagining more, so to speak, becomes easier for the developing anthroposophist than thinking abstractly.

This is something that becomes very noticeable very quickly in some particularly enthusiastic anthroposophists. A preference for exclusively anthroposophical activities develops. People begin to enjoy reading and thinking only about anthroposophy, not merely because they are enthusiastic anthroposophists, but because it becomes easier for them to find their way into these more spiritual ideas, which, as far as the physical plane is concerned, engage the middle parts of the brain, while abstract thinking engages the outer parts of the brain. This is where the aversion of some overzealous anthroposophists to abstract thinking and abstract science comes from. This is also why individual anthroposophists note with a certain wistfulness how they used to be able to think abstractly and how this abstract thinking is now becoming more difficult.

In this way, the individual organs become more alive and independent within themselves, and even individual parts of organs become more alive and independent. You can see from this that something new must enter into the human being who goes through this. In the past, it was a benevolent nature that brought his organs into the right connection without his intervention; now these organs become more independent and enter into an independent relationship with each other. Now he must have more strength from within to truly call the organs back into harmony. This calling of the organs and organ parts into harmony is achieved by constantly emphasizing, in every proper practice of anthroposophy, everything that increases the human being's control over his organs, which have become more independent. Why does something play such an important role in our literature that some people simply say, “Oh, but that's terribly difficult!” I have often had to give a very peculiar answer when people said, “The book Theosophy is really too difficult for beginners.” I had to say, “It couldn't be any easier.” If it had been made easier, people would have absorbed certain anthroposophical truths into their inner lives, which would have had an effect, including on the independence of the individual parts of the brain; but this book is constructed in a proper thought structure so that the other part of the brain is also constantly forced to really exercise itself, not to lag behind, so to speak. This is what is peculiar about a movement based on occult principles, which makes it necessary not only to pay attention to what is right in the abstract sense and simply proclaim it in any way you like, but also to proclaim it in a healthy way and take the utmost care that the matter is not proclaimed for the sake of popularity in such a way that it could be harmful at the same time. In anthroposophy, it is not merely important that the relevant truths are communicated in books and speeches, but it is important how they are written and how they are communicated. And so it is all the better if those who wish to become the bearers of such a movement do not allow themselves to be deterred from carrying out this or that for the sake of popularity. More than in any other field, what is at stake here is a commitment to pure and honest truth. And it is precisely when one addresses questions such as the transformation of the human shell through an anthroposophical life that one realizes how necessary it is to present anthroposophy to the world in the right way.

I would just like to note that the lectures I will be giving are to be taken as a whole, and that therefore some of the concerns that may arise in this or that soul during the first lecture will already be resolved.