Evolution in the Aspect of Realities
GA 132
14 November 1911, Dornach
3. Inner aspect of Moon-Embodiment of Earth I
In the last two lectures an endeavour was made to call attention to the fact that behind all the material phenomena of the substance of our earth something spiritual is to be sought. We endeavoured to describe the spiritual to be found behind the phenomenon of heat, and then that behind the phenomenon of flowing air. As, in order to do this, it was necessary to turn back to the very early ages of our evolution, we had to glance into our own soul-life to describe the spiritual conditions underlying matter. For it is obvious that the concepts by means of which anything is described must necessarily be drawn from somewhere. Words alone will not suffice; we must have quite definite conceptions. As we have seen, the spiritual conditions to which we referred are so far removed from anything experienced by man at the present time, or of which he can have knowledge—that we had to appeal to certain conditions in our soul-life, conditions by no means universal. We have seen that the deepest being of all conditions of heat and fire must be sought very far away from what we know as external physical fire or heat. To a man of the present day it must appear truly absurd that sacrifice should be recognised as the essence of all conditions of heat: a sacrifice made by very definite Beings to be met with in the old Saturn state of the Earth—the Thrones—who then brought their sacrifice to the Cherubim. And yet in truth we must say that a sacrifice such as possessed its starting point in the world-evolution, appears to us—although in maya or illusion—in all external conditions of heat or fire. In the last lecture we also recognised that behind all that we may call flowing air or flowing gas, there is something very far away, which we have called ‘the virtue of bestowal,’ the devotional pouring forth by spiritual Beings of their own being. This is to be found in every breath of wind, in all flowing air. Thus what is perceived externally, physically, is in reality mere illusion, nothing but maya; and only when we progress from maya to the incorporeal, the spiritual, do we obtain the correct conception of fire and heat; for in fact fire, heat and light bear the same relation to the real world as does the reflected image of a man seen in a mirror to the person himself. For, just as the mirror presents merely an illusion in relation to the man, so in this sense, fire, heat and air are illusions; and the realities behind these bear the same relation to them as the real man to his reflection. Neither fire nor air should be sought in the world of reality, but sacrifice, and the virtue of bestowal.
When we saw the virtue of bestowal added to that of sacrifice we ascend from the life of ancient Saturn to that of ancient Sun. In the latter, the second cosmic embodiment of our earth, we find something which brings us a step nearer to the real conditions of development. Yet another concept must now be introduced, which belongs to the world of reality as concerned with the world of illusion. But before passing to the actual conditions of development we must acquire a definite idea from the following.
When in his external life a man does something, accomplishes something, the impulse of his will as a rule underlies it. Whatever he does, be it the movement of a hand or the greatest of deeds, the impulse of the will underlies them. From his will proceeds everything that leads to an act, to an achievement. Now at first a man would say that a strong, forceful act, one for instance that is to bring about great healing and blessing, must proceed from a stronger impulse of will, while a less important act comes from a weaker impulse. And in general it is assumed that the greatness of the deed depends upon the strength of the impulse of the will. But only in a certain degree is it correct that as we intensify our will we accomplish great things in the world. Certain deeds that man may do—particularly such as bear upon the spiritual world—do not, strange to say, now depend upon the strengthening of our impulses of will. In the physical world, in which we particularly live, the greatness of our deeds certainly does depend upon the strength of our impulses of will, for the more we wish to accomplish, the greater are the efforts we must make. But in the spiritual world this is not so, there the opposite comes to pass. There it is the case that the greatest deeds or better said, the greatest results do not necessitate any strengthening of the positive impulses of will, but far more a certain resignation, a renouncing. Take the very smallest purely spiritual facts. We do not attain any spiritual effects by bringing strong desires into play, or by bestirring ourselves as much as possible; no—in the spiritual world we attain certain results by controlling our wishes and desires, and renouncing all idea of satisfying them. Suppose a man has made up his mind to bring something about in the world by means of inner spiritual workings. To do this he would have to prepare himself by learning above all to suppress his own wishes and desires. For whereas in the physical world we grow stronger when we eat well, when we are well nourished and acquire greater strength thereby, so, in the spiritual world, when we wish to attain something important we can precisely do so with the greatest ease, if, by fasting or other means, we repress and control our wishes and desires; (this is only a statement, and not given by way of advice). The greatest spiritual, magical effects, always require preparation connected with the renunciation of wishes, desires, and impulses of will which may appear within us. The less we ‘will’ the more we say: We will allow life to flow over us, not longing for this or that, but accepting everything just as Karma sends it to us, the more we are able to accept Karma and its workings in this way, keeping quietly ready to renounce all that we should otherwise wish to choose for this life, the more forceful shall we become as regards the activity of our thinking. In the case of a teacher or tutor who is above all things fond of eating and drinking and has other masterful passions, it will be noticeable that his words to his pupils will not accomplish very much, his words will go in at one ear and out at the other. He will think that this is the fault of the pupils, but that is not always the case. A man who has begun to lead a higher life, who lives temperately, who only eats as much as is necessary to support life, who is determined to accept what destiny brings him with equanimity, will gradually notice that his words have great force; he will not even require to look at his pupils, but only to be near them and have encouraging thought without expressing it, and that thought will pass over to the pupil. It all depends on the degree of renunciation and self-denial he has acquired as regards the things usually desired by man.
The right path for spiritual activities intended to lead to spiritual effects in the higher worlds, is that of renunciation. In relation to this many delusions are met with, and delusions while resembling true renunciation, do not lead to the right results. We are all acquainted with what in ordinary life is called ‘asceticism,’ self-inflicted suffering. In many cases the practice of this may be a spiritual self-indulgence, for a person may practise it in order to obtain great results, or from some other source of desire for self-satisfaction. In such cases asceticism produces no results; it is of no avail unless it is a sign of the renunciation rooted in the spirit. Let us then acquire the concept of the creative renunciation, the creative resignation. It is indeed of immense importance that we should accept this renunciation, this creative resignation, which we may experience in the soul, as a conception of something far removed from our everyday life; and then we are guided a step deeper into the evolution of humanity. For in the process of evolution something of the kind really does take place in the transition from the conditions of ancient Sun to those of ancient Moon. Something of the nature of renunciation takes place in the realm of the Beings of the higher worlds, for these Beings, as we know already, are connected with the process of the earth's development. At this juncture let us once again call to mind the ancient Sun evolution. But let us first give our attention to something else with which we are already familiar, but which may until now have appeared in some respects to be somewhat of an enigma.
We have repeatedly drawn attention to occurrences in evolution which must be traced back to those beings who have in the course of evolution ‘remained behind.’ We know that the Luciferic beings have invaded the domain of our earth humanity. It has repeatedly been necessary to draw attention to the fact that these beings are able to enter our astral body during the development of our earth because they did not, during the evolution of the Moon, reach the stage they ought to have attained. A commonplace comparison has often been used, that as in our schools some pupils remain behind, so even in the great cosmic evolution there are cosmic beings who, remaining behind in the stages of their own evolution, subsequently interfere with the evolutionary stages of other beings, with a result similar to that produced by the Luciferic beings, who lingered behind on the ancient Moon. We might easily suppose these to be faulty beings actually injurious to the evolution of the world; for why did they linger behind? Such a thought might occur to us. The thought, however, which we should entertain is this: that man would never have attained his freedom, or the capacity for individual initiative action had not the Luciferic beings remained behind on the Moon. So that on the one hand man owes to the Luciferic beings the fact that he has in his astral body passions, emotions, and desires driving him constantly down from a certain height into lower parts of his nature. But, on the other hand, if man were incapable of wickedness, unable to err from good through the forces of the Luciferic beings in his astral body he could not act freely, or possess what we call freewill, freedom of choice. We must therefore admit that to the Luciferic beings we owe our freedom. The deduction to be drawn from this is that the one-sided view is not valid that claims that they only lead man astray; their remaining behind must be regarded as something beneficial, as something without which he could never have acquired his human dignity, in the true sense of the word.
Now what we call the ‘remaining behind’ of the Luciferic and Ahrimanic beings is based on something much deeper, something already to be encountered in connection with ancient Saturn, although it is there so difficult to perceive that words could hardly be found in any language to describe it. But when we advance to the ancient Sun-existence, we are able to describe it quite distinctly if we bear in mind the idea of resignation or renunciation which we just described at the beginning of this lecture. For what lies beneath all such remaining behind and all its influence is renunciation, resignation by higher Beings. So now, on the Sun we see the following taking place. We have said that the Thrones, the Spirits of Will, offer sacrifice to the Cherubim; and this they do, as we have seen in the last lecture, not only during the Saturn period, but they continue their sacrifice through that of the Sun, so that there too we have the idea of the Thrones or Spirits of Will sacrificing to the Cherubim. In this sacrifice is to be found the actual essence of all the conditions of heat or fire present in the world. Now: if we look back into the Akashic Record of the Sun-age we can quite distinctly notice the following. The Thrones offer and continue their sacrificial activity; so that we have there the sacrificing Thrones and a host of Cherubim to whom, as we see, the sacrifice rises, while they take into themselves the heat which flows forth from it. However, another host of Cherubim accomplish something else; these renounce the sacrifice, they do not accept what is offered them. We must therefore complete the picture we called up before our minds in the last lecture.
In this picture we have the sacrificing Thrones and those Cherubim who accept their sacrifice, and we also have the Cherubim who do not accept it—but give back that which was offered up to them. It is extraordinarily interesting to follow this in the Akashic Record. For by reason of the bestowing virtue of the Spirits of Wisdom now flowing into the sacrificial heat we are able during the ancient Sun-period to see ascending something like sacrificial smoke of which we have said, that it is reflected back by the Archangels from the outermost periphery of the Sun, in the form of light. But now besides this, something altogether different seems to appear in the space of ancient Sun; not merely the sacrificial smoke thrown back by the Archangels in the form of light, but also that smoke which was not accepted by the Cherubim and which as it were flows back again, as though dammed back. So that we have permanent clouds of sacrifice in space; Sacrifice that ascends, Sacrifice that descends, Sacrifice accepted and Sacrifice rejected. The encounter of these intrinsically Spiritual cloud-formations is seen to take place between what in the last lecture we called the ‘outer’ and the ‘inner’, until the separation occurs. Thus in the centre we have the sacrificing Thrones, then in the heights above the Cherubim accepting the sacrifice, and beside these, those other Cherubim who did not accept the proffered sacrifice, but diverted its course back again. Through this diversion arises, as it were, an encircling cloud, and right outside we have the cast-back masses of light. Let us try to form a picture of this in our minds. We must think of this ancient Sun-space, the ancient Sun-mass as a cosmic globe beyond which we conceive of nothing, so that we only imagine space extending as far as the Archangels. Let us further picture in the centre of this globular formation the meeting of the accepted and the rejected sacrifices. From these two, the accepted and rejected sacrifices, there comes into being in the ancient Sun something that we may call a division of the whole Sun-substance, a divergence. If we wish to compare the Sun in that bygone age with any external image, we can only compare it with the form of our present Saturn which is a globe encircled by rings; for that which is in the centre is thrown inwards by volumes of sacrifice and that which was outside is arranged as an encircling mass. Thus we have the Sun's substance divided into two parts by the force of the arrested and dammed up powers of the sacrifice.
What then is brought about by this renunciation of the sacrifice on the part of certain of the Cherubim?
We are now coming to an extremely difficult chapter indeed, and we shall only be able gradually to grasp, by means of meditation, what is comprised in the conceptions about to be set forth. Only after long and profound reflection upon the conceptions about to be given can we discern what the realities are that underlie them. That resignation of which mention has already been made, must be brought into connection with the origin of Time—the scene of which we have laid in ancient Saturn. Time, as we have seen, actually originated on ancient Saturn, with the Archai or Spirits of Time, and there is no sense in referring to Time previous to ancient Saturn. Now at the risk of repeating ourselves, we may say that Time continues. Continuity or Duration is a conception which contains Time within itself. Thus when we say that Time is continuous it means that when we observe Saturn and Sun in the Akashic records, on Saturn we find the origin of Time—and on the Sun we still find Time present. Now if all conditions remained as they were, as we described them in the last two lectures when speaking of Saturn and Sun. Time would then form an element in everything that happens in evolution. We could not in thought eliminate Time from any occurrence in evolution. We have seen that the Spirits of Time came into being on ancient Saturn, and that Time is implanted into everything. All that we have hitherto thought whether in pictures or in imagination concerning evolution we must bring into connection with Time. All that has taken place—sacrifice and the virtue of bestowal, which we have mentioned—would be subject to Time, nothing would not be subject to Time, which means that all arising and passing away which indeed pertains to Time, must be subject to it.
Now those Cherubim who renounced the acceptance of the sacrifice and of that which was, as it were, contained in the smoke of the sacrifice, did so because in so doing, they withdrew from the properties of this sacrificial smoke. And to these properties belongs above all Time, which includes ‘arising’ and ‘passing away.’ The whole renunciation of the sacrifice on the part of these Cherubim signifies that they had grown beyond the conditions of Time. These Cherubim extended beyond Time and withdrew from subjection to it. The combination of circumstances during the evolution of ancient Sun was such, that the sacrificing and the virtue of bestowal, which conditions continued in a direct line from Saturn, remain subject to Time; whilst others, brought about by the other Cherubim who renounced the acceptance of the sacrifice wrested themselves free, and chose Eternity, Duration, permanence, the non-subjection to arising and passing away. It is in the highest degree remarkable; during the evolution of ancient Sun we come to a severance between Time and Eternity. Through the resignation made by the Cherubim during the Sun-evolution, Eternity was gained, as a property of certain conditions which then came about. Just as we saw, on looking into our soul, that in it certain effects were produced through the acquisition by man of the qualities of renunciation and resignation—so we see, speaking now of the ancient Sun alone, that eternity and immortality were acquired by certain divine Spiritual Beings, that they resigned the sacrifice and all that might have come to them from the virtue of bestowal and all its diffused gifts. Whereas we have seen Time coming into being on ancient Saturn, we have also seen certain conditions wresting themselves free from it during the Sun development. But we must take special care to note that this was prepared even during the Saturn-age; so that Eternity does not actually begin during the Sun age. This can however, only be sufficiently clearly and distinctly observed so that it can be expressed in concepts, in the Sun-age: on Saturn the division between Time and Eternity is so faintly perceptible that our ideas and words do not prove precise enough to define anything of the sort for ancient Saturn and its evolution.
We have now learnt the significance of resignation, the renunciation made by the gods during the time of ancient Sun, and the attainment of immortality. What was the further consequence of this?
From the study of the book Occult Science which must in certain respects still be veiled in Maya, we learn that the evolution of ancient Moon followed that of ancient Sun, that at the close of the Sun-age all the existing conditions were immersed in a kind of twilight, in a sort of cosmic chaos, from which emerged the Moon. And we see the sacrifice re-issuing in the form of heat. All that remained as heat on ancient Sun reappears as heat on the Moon; we see the virtue of bestowal reappearing as gas, or air. And with the resignation also continues the renunciation of the sacrifice; all that we have called ‘resignation’ is within whatever takes place on ancient Moon. It is actually the case, that what we can ourselves experience as resignation we must think of in everything on ancient Moon, carried over from ancient Sun, and as we think of everything else in the external world. That which had been sacrifice reappears in Maya as Heat; and that which was bestowing virtue appears in Maya as gas or air. Resignation as it has now become appears in external Maya as Fluidity, as ‘Water’. ‘Water’ is Maya and would not be in the world at all were it not that its spiritual foundation is renunciation, or resignation. Wherever water is to be found in the world there is divine-renunciation. Just as heat is an illusion behind which is sacrifice, and gas or air an illusion behind which is the virtue of bestowal, so is water as a substance, as an external reality, nothing but an illusion of the senses, a reflection; the only reality existing in it, is resignation by certain Beings of that which they receive from other Beings. It might be said, water could only flow in the world because resignation underlies it. Now, we know that while the Sun progressed to Moon, airy conditions condensed to watery conditions. Water first appeared on the Moon; on ancient Sun there was as yet no water. What we see gathering like clouds during the old Sun development coagulated as they interpenetrated each other, to denser substance, to ‘water,’ and this appears on ancient Moon as the Moon-ocean.
If we bear this in mind it will at any rate be possible to grasp a question that may be raised. From resignation comes forth water; water is in literal truth resignation. We acquire a peculiar kind of spiritual insight into the actual nature of water. But now the question may be raised: There is after all a certain difference between the conditions which would have arisen if the Cherubim had not made this resignation, and that which has actually come about through their having done so. Is this difference in any way conveyed? Yes, it is. It is conveyed in the fact that the consequences of that resignation appeared clearly during the Sun-State. If it had never been made, if the Cherubim had accepted the proffered sacrifice, they would—speaking figuratively—have had the sacrificial smoke as part of their own inner substance; what they themselves had done would have found expression in the smoke of the sacrifice. Suppose these Cherubim had accomplished this or that; this would have been apparent, it would have been outwardly expressed by the changing clouds of the air; that is to say: In the outer form of the air would have been expressed what the Cherubim who made no resignation did with the substance of the sacrifice. But they did reject it, and in so doing they passed from mortality to immortality, from a transitory state into a State of Duration. However the substance of the sacrifice is there to begin with; it is released from the forces, so to speak, which it would otherwise have absorbed, and is now obliged to follow the inclinations and impulses of the Cherubim; for they gave it up, they renounced it. What then happens to this substance of sacrifice? The following occurs: It happens that other beings, because the sacrificial substance is not with the Cherubim, take possession of it, become independent of the Cherubim, self-reliant beings; whereas they would otherwise have been directed from the sacrificial substance within the Cherubim, if the latter had accepted it. Thus it became possible for the opposite of resignation to arise; in that certain beings attracted to themselves the substance of the sacrifice that had been poured forth and become active within it. These beings are ‘they who remained behind’; ‘remaining behind’ was therefore a consequence of the resignation made by the Cherubim. Through the very substance which they refused to accept, the Cherubim themselves furnished backward beings with the first possibility of staying behind. Through the rejection of a sacrifice, other beings who did not resign it, but gave way to their wishes and desires, bringing them to expression were enabled to take possession of the object of the sacrifice, of the sacrificial substance, thereby attaining the possibility of taking their place as independent beings side by side with those who here were offering.
Thus, when evolution passed from ancient Sun to Moon, with the immortality of the Cherubim, the possibility was given for other beings to separate in their own substance from the uninterrupted evolution of the Cherubim, generally speaking from the immortal beings. So now, when we learn the deeper reasons of the remaining behind, we see that the original fault—if we may venture to speak of such an original fault—did not lay with those who remained behind. This is the important point, which we must realise: If the Cherubim had accepted the proffered sacrifice, the Luciferic beings could not have remained behind; they would have had no opportunity of embodying themselves in that substance. To make it possible for beings to become thus independent, renunciation previously took place. Thus, in cosmic evolution it is the case that the gods themselves called their opponents into being. If the gods had not renounced the sacrifice, beings would not have been able to oppose them. Put into simple words we may suppose the gods had foreseen as follows: ‘If we merely go on creating as we have done from Saturn to Sun there would never be any free beings, capable of acting from their own initiative. In order that beings of this nature might come into existence, the possibility must be given for opponents to arise against us in the Universe, so that we should meet with resistance in that which is subject to time. If we ourselves ordain everything we shall meet with no such resistance. We could make everything very easy for ourselves by accepting the sacrifice offered to us; then would the whole of evolution be subject unto us. But this will not do, we want beings able to resist us. We will therefore not accept the sacrifice; so that through our resignation and because they accept the sacrifice, they become our opponents!’
So we see that we must not look for the origin of evil in the so-called ‘evil’ beings, but in the ‘good’ Beings, who, through their resignation first brought evil about through those beings who were able to bring it into the world. But now the following objection may easily be made, (and I want you to let these thoughts work profoundly upon your souls): I have till now thought more highly of the gods! I have always believed them able to give freedom to man without creating the possibility of evil. How is it that all these ‘good gods could not produce something like human freedom without bringing evil into the world?’ In this connection I should like to remind you of that Spanish King who considered the world dreadfully complicated, and who said on one occasion that if God had allowed him to create it he would have made it much simpler—Man in his weakness may think that the world might have been made simpler than it is, but the gods knew better and therefore they did not allow man to create the world.
From the standpoint of scientific perception, we might describe these circumstances more accurately. Suppose something required supporting and the suggestion were made that a column might be erected and the weight rested on that. This person in question might say: ‘There must be some other way of doing it!’ Why, indeed, should it not be done in some other way? Or again, when a triangle is made use of in building, it might be said: Why should a triangle have only three angles? Perhaps a god might make a triangle not having three angles? There would be just as little sense in thinking of a triangle without three angles, as in supposing that the gods might have created freedom without the possibility of evil and suffering. Just as three angles are necessary to a triangle, so the possibility of evil, given by the resignation of Divine Beings, is necessary to freedom. It all forms part of the Divine resignation, for the gods created evolution out of immortality, after they had through their renunciation or sacrifice, ascended to immortality, in order to lead back evil to good. The gods did not shrink from the evil, which alone could give the possibility of freedom. Had the gods avoided evil, the world would be poor, without variety. For the sake of freedom the gods had to allow evil to enter the world, and for this reason they had to acquire the power enabling them to lead evil back again to good. This power is such it can only be acquired as a consequence of renunciation and resignation.
Religions always exist for the purpose of showing us the great cosmic mysteries in symbols, in imaginations. In this lecture we have alluded to primordial phases of evolution, and by adding the conception of resignation to those of sacrifice and of the bestowing virtue we have come a step further, from Maya and illusion into the realities. Conceptions such as these are presented to man in religions. And in that of the Bible there is something whereby man can acquire a conception of resignation, of the rejection of the sacrifice. That is the story of the sacrifice about to be made by Abraham who was ready to offer his own son to God, and of the renouncing by God of the sacrifice offered by the patriarch. If we take into our souls this conception of sacrifice, then intuitive visions such as those described, may come to us. On one occasion I suggested that we should suppose that the sacrifice of Abraham had been accepted, that Isaac had been sacrificed. As all the ancient Hebrew people are descended from him, God would then by accepting the sacrifice have taken this whole nation from the earth. Everything derived from Abraham was a gift of God through the renunciation of a sphere to be outside Himself; if He had accepted the sacrifice He would have taken into Himself the whole sphere which played its part within the ancient Hebrew people; for the sacrificed Isaac would have been with God. But He renounced this and therewith He gave over that whole line of evolution to the earth. Thus in the significant picture of the offering made by the old patriarch, the conception of renunciation and of sacrifice can arise within us.
And in yet another part of our earth-history do we find this resigning on the part of Higher Beings, and here too we must again refer to something alluded to in the last lecture—the picture of the ‘Last Supper,’ by Leonardo da Vinci. It represents the scene in which as it were, we have before us the meaning of the earth, the Christ. While trying to penetrate the whole meaning of the picture, let us recollect those words, which are to be found alone in the Gospel: ‘Am I not able to call forth a whole multitude of angels if I wish to avoid the death of sacrifice.’ That which Christ might have accepted at that moment, which would of course have been quite easy for Him to do, He rejected in resignation and renunciation. And the greatest renunciation made by Christ Jesus confronts us when, by having made it, He allows the opponent himself—Judas—to enter His sphere. If we are able to see in Christ Jesus all that is to he seen, we must see in Him an image of those Beings with whom, at a certain stage of evolution, we have just become acquainted, those who were compelled to renounce the proffered sacrifice, those whose very nature was resignation. Christ renounced that which would have occurred if He had not allowed Judas to appear as His opponent just as once upon a time, during the Sun-age, the gods themselves called forth their opponents by the renunciation they made. And we see a repetition of this event in a picture here on earth: that of the Christ seated among the twelve, and Judas, the betrayer, in the centre. In order that that which makes mankind of such immeasurable value might enter into evolution, Christ Himself had to place His opponent in opposition to Him. This picture makes such a profound impression on us because when we contemplate it, it reminds us of such a great cosmic moment; and when we recall the words: ‘He who dips his bread into the bowl with me, he it is who shall betray me,’ we see an earthly reflection of the opponent of the gods, placed in opposition to them by the gods themselves. For this reason I have often ventured to say that if an inhabitant of Mars were able to descend to the earth, he might find things which would be of more or less interest to him although he might perhaps not understand them properly; but as soon as he saw this picture by Leonardo da Vinci he would, through a certain position in the cosmos which has the same connection with Mars as with the earth, learn something which would teach him the meaning of the earth. The incident represented in the earthly picture is of significance to the whole Cosmos: that is the fact that certain powers place themselves in opposition to the immortal Divine power. And this representation of Christ surrounded by His Apostles, He who on the earth overcomes death and thus proves the triumph of immortality, is intended to point to that significant universal moment when the gods severed themselves from temporal existence and gained the victory over Time, that is they became immortal. When we contemplate the ‘Last Supper’ by Leonardo da Vinci, we may feel this in our hearts. Do not object that a person of simple mind may contemplate this picture and not know all that has been referred to to-day. It is not necessary that he should. For such are the mysterious depths of the human soul, that it is not necessary to understand with the intellect what the soul feels. Does the flower know the laws which regulate its growth? No! Yet none the less it grows. What does the flower want with laws or the human soul with intellect to feel the whole immeasurable greatness of the subject, when before our eyes we see depicted a God and His opponents; when the highest that can possibly be expressed, the opposition of immortality to the transitory is brought before our eyes. It is not necessary to know this; for it passes into the soul with magic force when one stands before this picture, which represents in painting an image of the cosmic purpose. The artist [is not required] to be an occultist in this sense in order to paint this picture. But in the soul of Leonardo da Vinci were precisely the necessary forces to enable him to express this, the highest and most significant. That is why great works of art make such a tremendous impression, because they are intimately connected with the purpose of the cosmic order. In earlier ages artists in dim consciousness were in touch with this cosmic purpose without being aware of it. Art would however, die out altogether if nothing were received by way of continuation of this, if, in the future Anthroposophy were not there as the knowledge of these things to give to art a new foundation. Subconscious art has become a thing of the past. The art which submits to the inspiration of Anthroposophy is only at its starting point, its beginning. This will be the art of the future. Just as the artist of old had no need to know what lay behind his works of art, so the artist of the future must know this—but knowledge with those forces which represent afresh an aspect of immortality, something of the perfection of the soul. For a man who uses Anthroposophy as an intellectual science knows nothing of it. That man alone understands who has made it his own, who in every conception that we evolve—sacrifice, bestowing virtue, resignation—is able to feel in every word what it is that is trying to burst forth in that word or idea, what at the most can flow forth in the many-sided significance of the pictures. If a man believes the evolution of the world is accomplished by means of abstract conceptions, he will perhaps make diagrams. If we wish to represent living conceptions such as sacrifice, or the virtue of bestowal and renunciation, diagrams are of no use; we must paint pictures in our minds like those described in the last lectures: of the Thrones offering sacrifice and sending up to the Cherubim the smoke of the sacrifice, ever spreading more widely and of the Archangels sending hack the light; and so on. And when in our next study we pass on to the Moon. existence we shall see how much richer the picture becomes, how something like the liquefying of the dammed up masses of cloud actually had to take place, and that this becomes drizzling rain, into which flashes the lightning of the Seraphim. We must then pass on to richer conceptions still with regard to which we must say: The future of mankind will certainly find the possibility, the artistic ways and means to convey to the consciousness and express to the outer world what can otherwise only be read in the Akashic Records.
Dritter Vortrag
In unseren beiden letzten Betrachtungen hier haben wir versucht, den Hinweis darauf zu erbringen, wie hinter allem Materiell-Stofflichen unserer Welterscheinungen Geistiges zu suchen ist. Wir haben versucht, zunächst das Geistige, das sich hinter den Wärmeerscheinungen, dann hinter den Erscheinungen der strömenden Luft findet, zu charakterisieren. Wir mußten, da wir ja, um solche Charakteristiken geben zu können, in sehr frühe, urferne Vergangenheiten unserer Entwickelung zurückzugreifen hatten, wir mußten bei unserer Schilderung jener geistigen Verhältnisse, die dem Materiellen zugrunde liegen, in unser eigenes Seelenleben blicken. Denn es ist selbstverständlich notwendig, daß man irgendwoher die Vorstellungen nimmt, mit denen man etwas charakterisiert. Worte allein tun es nicht, sondern wir müssen ganz bestimmte Vorstellungen haben. Wir haben gesehen, daß die geistigen Verhältnisse, auf die wir uns dabei beziehen müssen, zum Teil so ferne liegend alledem sind, was der Mensch gegenwärtig erlebt, wovon der Mensch gegenwärtig wissen kann, daß wir selbst in unserem Seelenleben, in unserem eigenen Geistesleben an seltene Zustände, an gar nicht allgemeine Verhältnisse appellieren mußten. Wir haben gesehen, daß wir das tiefste Wesen aller Wärme- und Feuerverhältnisse ganz weit abseits von dem suchen mußten, was äußerlich physikalisch Feuer oder Wärme ist. Gewiß muß es dem Menschen der Gegenwart recht grotesk erscheinen, wenn als das Wesen aller Feuer- und Wärmeverhältnisse der Welt das Opfer erkannt worden ist, das Opfer ganz bestimmter Wesenheiten, die wir auf dem alten Saturnzustand der Erde in einem gewissen Entwickelungszustand angetroffen haben, der Throne, die ihr Opfer den Cherubim damals darbrachten. Und in Wahrheit, mußten wir sagen, besteht ein solches Opfer, wie es damals seinen Ausgangspunkt. genommen hat in der Weltentwickelung, in allem, was uns äußerlich, in Maja oder Illusion, in den Wärme- oder Feuerverhältnissen erscheint.
Ebenso haben wir das letzte Mal erkannt, daß hinter allem, was wir nennen können strömende Luft oder strömende Gase, wiederum etwas sehr, sehr Fernes liegt, dasjenige, was wir «schenkende Tugend» genannt haben, das hingebungsvolle Ausgießen des eigenen Wesens geistiger Wesenheiten. Das liegt in jedem Windhauch, in aller strömenden Luft. Was also äußerlich physisch wahrgenommen wird, ist wirklich nur eine Illusion, eine Maja; und wir haben erst die richtige Vorstellung, wenn wir von der Maja vorschreiten zu dem Geistigen, zu dem Spirituellen. Im Wahrhaftigen der Welt ist Feuer oder Wärme oder Luft ebensowenig vorhanden, wie im Spiegelbild der Mensch, der sich im Spiegel sieht, vorhanden ist. Denn wie ein Spiegelbild im Grunde genommen eine Illusion im Verhältnis zum Menschen ist, so sind Feuer oder Wärme oder Luft Illusionen, und die Wahrheiten dahinter verhalten sich in Wirklichkeit so wie der wahrhaftige Mensch zu seinem Spiegelbilde. Nicht Feuer oder Luft haben wir zu suchen in der Welt des Wahrhaftigen, sondern Opfer und schenkende Tugend.
Dabei sind wir aufgestiegen, indem wir zu dem Opfer sozusagen hinzutreten sahen die schenkende Tugend, von dem alten Saturnleben zu dem alten Sonnenleben. Innerhalb des letzteren, das heißt der zweiten kosmischen Verkörperung unserer Erde, finden wir etwas, was uns wieder einen Schritt näher führen wird den wahrhaftigen Verhältnissen unserer Entwickelung. Und wir müssen heute wieder einen Begriff einführen, der der Welt des Wahrhaftigen angehört gegenüber der Welt der Illusion. Bevor wir also zu den eigentlichen Verhältnissen der Entwickelung übergehen, wollen wir uns einen bestimmten Begriff aneignen. Wir gehen dabei von folgendem aus.
Wenn der Mensch im äußeren Leben irgend etwas tut, irgend etwas vollzieht, so liegt dem in der Regel sein Willensimpuls zugrunde. Was der Mensch tut, sei es nun eine Handbewegung oder sei es die größte Tat, überall liegt ein Willensimpuls zugrunde. Von diesem geht dann alles übrige aus, was zu einer Tat, zu einer Verrichtung des Menschen führt. Der Mensch wird nun zunächst sagen: zu einer starken, kräftigen Tat, die, sagen wir, viel Heil und Segen bringen soll, gehöre ein starker Willensimpuls, und zu einer weniger bedeutsamen Tat gehöre ein schwacher Willensimpuls. Und im allgemeinen wird der Mensch zu der Annahme geneigt sein, daß von der Stärke des Willensimpulses die Größe der Tat abhängt.
Nun ist das aber nur bis zu einem gewissen Grade richtig, daß wir, wenn wir unseren Willen verstärken, Großes in der Welt erreichen. Von einem gewissen Punkt an ist das nämlich nicht mehr der Fall. Gewisse Taten, die der Mensch tun kann, Taten, die sich vor allen Dingen auf die geistige Welt beziehen, hängen nun nicht ab von der Verstärkung unserer Willensimpulse, sonderbarerweise. Gewiß, in der physischen Welt, in der wir zunächst leben, wird die Größe der Tat abhängen von der Größe des Willensimpulses, denn wir müssen uns stärker anstrengen, wenn wir mehr erreichen wollen. Aber in der geistigen Welt ist das gar nicht so, sondern da tritt das Gegenteil von dem ein. Da ist es so, daß zu den größten Taten, zu den größten Wirkungen, können wir besser noch sagen, nicht eine Verstärkung des positiven Willensimpulses notwendig ist, sondern vielmehr eine gewisse Resignation, ein Verzicht. Wir können da schon von den kleinsten, rein geistigen Tatsachen ausgehen. Wir erreichen eine gewisse geistige Wirkung nicht dadurch, daß wir möglichst unsere Begehrlichkeit in Szene setzen, oder möglichst geschäftig sind, sondern in der geistigen Welt erreichen wir gewisse Wirkungen dadurch, daß wir unsere Wünsche und Begierden bezähmen und auf deren Befriedigung verzichten.
Nehmen wir einmal an, ein Mensch habe es darauf abgesehen, durch innere geistige Wirkungen etwas in der Welt zu erreichen. Dann muß er sich dazu dadurch vorbereiten, daß er vor allen Dingen seine Wünsche, seine Begierden unterdrücken lernt. Und während man in der Welt des Physischen kräftiger wird, sagen wir, wenn man gut ißt, wenn man sich gut ernährt und dadurch mehr Kräfte hat, wird man - es ist das jetzt nur eine Schilderung, kein Rat! - in der geistigen Welt Bedeutsames in einer gewissen Weise gerade dann erreichen, wenn man fastet oder in einer anderen Weise etwas tut, um die Wünsche und Begierden zu unterdrücken, zu bezähmen. Und zu den größten geistigen Wirkungen, sagen wir zu magischen Wirkungen, gehört immer eine solche Vorbereitung, die zusammenhängt mit Verzicht auf Wünsche, Begierden, Willensimpulse, die in uns auftreten. Je weniger wir «wollen», je mehr wir uns sagen: Wir lassen das Leben an uns vorüberströmen und begehren nicht dies und begehren nicht jenes, sondern nehmen die Dinge, wie sie uns Karma zuwirft —, je mehr wir so Karma und seine Wirkungen hinnehmen und ruhig uns verhalten in einem Verzicht in bezug auf alles, was wir sonst im Leben erreichen wollen für dieses Leben, desto kräftiger werden wir zum Beispiel in bezug auf Gedankenwirkungen.
Bei einem Menschen, der ein sehr begierdenvoller Mensch ist, der es vor allen Dingen liebt, recht gut zu essen und zu trinken und auch sonst begierdenvoll ist, bei dem wird sich herausstellen, wenn er zum Beispiel Lehrer oder Erzieher ist, daß seine Worte, die er an seine Zöglinge richtet, nicht viel erreichen; das geht bei den Zöglingen zum einen Ohr hinein, zum anderen heraus. Er wird dann der Meinung sein, daß dies die Schuld der Zöglinge wäre. Das ist aber nicht immer der Fall. Der Mensch, der eine höhere Lebensauffassung hat, der mäßig lebt, der nur so viel ißt, als nötig ist, um das Leben zu unterhalten, der vorzugsweise darauf bedacht ist, die Dinge, die das Schicksal gibt, hinzunehmen, der wird allmählich merken, daß seine Worte eine größere Kraft haben; ja, sein Blick kann dann schon eine große Kraft haben, und es braucht nicht einmal zum Blick zu kommen, er braucht nur neben dem Zögling zu sein, braucht nur einen aufmunternden Gedanken zu haben, den er gar nicht äußert: das wird auf den Zögling übergehen. Das alles hängt ab von dem Grade des Verzichtes, der Resignation gegenüber dem, was der Mensch sonst verlangt.
Nun ist für geistige Betätigungen, um geistige Wirkungen in den höheren Welten zu erzielen, der richtige Weg der, welcher durch den Verzicht geht. In dieser Beziehung bestehen viele Täuschungen; und Täuschungen führen nicht - deshalb, weil sie auch im Äußeren so ähnlich aussehen - zu den richtigen Wirkungen. Sie alle kennen das, was man im gewöhnlichen Leben die Askese, die Selbstpeinigung nennt. Diese Selbstpeinigung kann in vielen Fällen geradezu eine Wollust sein, die der Betreffende aus der Begierde heraus wählt, zum Beispiel, um viel zu erreichen, oder sei es auch aus einem anderen Begierdequell, um der Wollust willen. Dann wirkt die Askese nichts; denn sie hat nur dann eine Bedeutung, wenn sie als Begleiterscheinung des schon im Geistigen wurzelnden Verzichts auftritt. Diesen Begriff wollen wir uns eben aneignen: den Begriff des schöpferischen Verzichtes, der schöpferischen Resignation. Es ist ungeheuer wichtig, daß wir diesen Verzicht, diese schöpferische Resignation, die wir ja in der Seele erleben können, wieder als eine dem alltäglichen Leben fernliegende Vorstellung aufnehmen: dann werden wir einen Schritt tiefer in die Menschheitsevolution hineingeführt werden können. Denn so etwas geschieht im Verlaufe der Evolution, zum Beispiel beim Herübergang der Entwickelung von den Sonnenverhältnissen zu den Mondverhältnissen. So etwas wie Resignieren geschieht im Bereiche der Wesenheiten der höheren Welten, von denen wir ja wissen, daß sie mit dem Fortgang der Erdentwickelung zusammenhängen. Und zwar wollen wir da noch einmal die alte Sonnenentwickelung ins Auge fassen. Aber machen wir zunächst noch auf etwas aufmerksam, was wir schon wissen, was uns aber bis jetzt noch in mancher Hinsicht rätselhaft erscheinen kann.
Wir haben wiederholt aufmerksam gemacht auf solche Vorgänge in der Entwickelung, die wir zurückzuführen haben auf Wesenheiten, die im Laufe der Entwickelung zurückgeblieben sind. So wissen wir, daß eingreifen in unsere Erdenmenschheit die luziferischen Wesenheiten. Wir haben wiederholt darauf aufmerksam machen müssen, daß diese luziferischen Wesenheiten deshalb in unseren astralischen Leib während der Erdentwickelung eingreifen, weil sie die Entwickelungsstufe, die sie während der alten Mondenentwickelung hätten erreichen können, nicht erreicht haben. Wir haben oftmals den trivialen Vergleich gebraucht, daß nicht nur in unseren Schulen die Schüler sitzenbleiben, sondern daß auch die Weltenwesen in der großen kosmischen Evolution sitzenbleiben auf ihren Entwickelungsstufen und später eingreifen in die Entwickelungsstufen von Wesenheiten und dann ähnliches bewirken wie die luziferischen Wesenheiten, die auf dem alten Monde zurückgeblieben sind, an dem Menschen auf der Erde.
Demgegenüber könnte man nun sehr leicht den Gedanken aufwerfen: Eigentlich sind diese Wesenheiten fehlerhafte Wesenheiten, Schwächlinge der Weltentwickelung; denn warum sind sie sitzengeblieben? Das ist der eine Gedanke, der uns kommen kann. Aber der andere Gedanke, den wir auch fassen können, ist der: daß der Mensch nie zu seiner Freiheit, zur selbsteigenen Entschließungsfähigkeit gekommen wäre, wenn die luziferischen Wesenheiten nicht auf dem Monde zurückgeblieben wären. So daß der Mensch den luziferischen Wesenheiten auf der einen Seite im Üblen das verdankt, daß er Begierden, Triebe, Leidenschaften in seinem Astralleib hat, die ihn fortwährend in der Entwickelung von einer gewissen Höhe herabdrängen, ihn nach niederen Regionen seines Seins hinziehen. Andererseits aber, wenn dies nicht der Fall wäre, daß der Mensch böse werden kann, daß er abirren kann von dem Guten durch die Kraft der luziferischen Wesenheiten in seinem Astralleib, könnte er auch nicht frei handeln, könnte er nicht das haben, was wir Freiheit des Willens, Willkür nennen. Wir müssen also sagen, auch unsere Freiheit verdanken wir den luziferischen Wesen. Daraus geht also schon hervor, daß die einseitige Auffassung, als ob die luziferischen Wesenheiten nur den Menschen herabbrächten, nicht zutrifft, sondern daß der Mensch ihr Zurückbleiben als etwas Gutes ansehen muß, als etwas, ohne das er gar nicht hätte seine Menschenwürde im wahren Sinne des Wortes erringen können.
Nun liegt alledem, was wir für die luziferischen und ahrimanischen Wesenheiten ein solches Zurückbleiben nennen, etwas viel Tieferes zugrunde, was uns zwar schon auf dem alten Saturn entgegentritt, aber dort so schwer erkennbar, daß wir kaum in irgendeiner Sprache Worte finden könnten, um das, was da zugrunde liegt auf dem alten Saturn, zu charakterisieren. Wenn wir dagegen zum alten Sonnendasein vorschreiten, können wir es ganz deutlich charakterisieren, wenn wir den heute zuerst beschriebenen Begriff der Resignation, des Verzichts ins Auge fassen. Denn allem solchen Zurückbleiben von Wesenheiten, allem solchen Hereinwirken durch das Zurückbleiben liegt zugrunde Resignation oder Verzicht höherer Wesenheiten. So können wir sehen, daß folgendes auf der Sonne auftritt. Wir haben gesagt, daß die Throne, die Geister des Willens, Opfer darbringen den Cherubim. Diese Opfer bringen sie — wie wir das letzte Mal gesehen haben - nicht nur während der Saturnzeit dar, sondern sie setzen sie fort während der Sonnenzeit. So daß wir auch da im Bilde bekommen haben: die Throne, die Geister des Willens, opfernd den Cherubim. Und in der Opferung liegt das eigentliche Wesen aller in der Welt existierenden Wärme- oder Feuerverhältnisse.. Während der Sonnenzeit können wir nun deutlich das folgende bemerken, wenn wir in der Akasha-Chronik zurückschauen: die Throne opfern, verbleiben bei ihrer Opfertätigkeit; so daß wir die opfernden Throne haben, haben auch eine Anzahl von Cherubim, zu denen wir das Opfer aufsteigen sehen, indem sie das, was aus dem Opfer fließt, die Wärme, in sich aufnehmen. Aber eine Anzahl von Cherubim vollzieht etwas anderes: sie verzichten auf das Opfer, nehmen nicht an die Opferung. Daher müssen wir das Bild, das wir das letzte Mal vor unsere Seele treten ließen, noch etwas ergänzen.
Wir haben in diesem Bilde die opfernden Throne und die das Opfer annehmenden Cherubim; wir haben aber auch solche Cherubim, die das Opfer nicht annehmen, sondern wieder zurückgeben, was als Opfer zu ihnen dringt. Das ist außerordentlich interessant in der AkashaChronik zu verfolgen. Denn dadurch, daß nun sozusagen die schenkende Tugend der Geister der Weisheit einfließt in die Opferwärme, dadurch sehen wir wie aufsteigend den Opferrauch während der alten Sonne, von dem wir gesagt haben, daß er dann durch die Erzengel in Form von Licht zurückgeworfen wird von dem äußersten Umfange der Sonne. Aber nun sehen wir etwas anderes noch, wie wenn innerhalb des alten Sonnenraumes noch etwas ganz anderes vorhanden wäre: Opferrauch, der aber jetzt nicht bloß durch die Erzengel im Licht zurückgeworfen wird, sondern der von den Cherubim nicht angenommen wird, so daß er wie zurückfließt, sich zurückstaut, so daß wir sich stauende Opferwolken im Sonnenraume haben: Opfer, das aufsteigt, Opfer, das absteigt; Opfer, das angenommen wird, Opfer, auf das verzichtet wird, das in sich zurückkehrt. Dieses Sich-Begegnen der eigentlichen spirituellen Wolkengebilde im alten Sonnenraum finden wir gleichsam zwischen dem, was wir das letzte Mal das Äußere und das Innere, diese beiden Dimensionen auf der Sonne, genannt haben, wie eine Trennungsschicht; so daß wir in der Mitte haben die opfernden Throne, dann die Cherubim in der Höhe, die das Opfer annehmen, dann solche Cherubim, die das Opfer nicht annehmen, sondern es zurückstauen. Durch dieses Zurückstauen entsteht gleichsam eine Ringwolke; und ganz außen haben wir die zurückgeworfenen Lichtmassen.
Stellen Sie sich dieses Bild ganz lebendig vor: daß wir also diesen alten Sonnenraum haben, diese alte Sonnenmasse, gleichsam eine kosmische Kugel, außerhalb welcher nichts vorzustellen ist, so daß wir nur den Raum uns zu denken haben bis zu den Erzengeln hin. Stellen wir uns weiter vor, daß wir in der Mitte diese Ringbildung aus den sich begegnenden angenommenen und zurückgewiesenen Opfern haben. Aus diesen angenommenen und zurückgewiesenen Opfern entsteht innerhalb der alten Sonne etwas, was wir nennen können eine Verdoppelung der ganzen Sonnensubstanz, ein Auseinandergehen. Mit einer äußeren Figur zu vergleichen ist die Sonne in dieser alten Zeit nur, wenn wir sie vergleichen mit unserer jetzigen Saturngestalt: der Kugel, die von einem Ring umgeben ist, indem diese sich stauenden Opfermassen nach einwärts werfen, was in der Mitte ist, und das, was außen ist, wird wie eine Ringmasse außen angeordnet. So haben wir die Sonnensubstanz eigentlich in zwei Teile getrennt durch die Kraft der sich stauenden Opfergewalten.
Was wird nun dadurch bewirkt, daß auf der Seite gewisser Cherubim ein solcher Verzicht auf das Opfer eintritt? - Es ist ein außerordentlich schwieriges Kapitel, dem wir uns da nähern, und Sie werden nur in langsamem Meditieren erfassen können, was in den Begriffen liegt, die jetzt auseinandergesetzt werden. Nur wenn man lange über die Begriffe, die gegeben werden, nachdenkt, wird man herausfinden, welche Realitäten diesen Begriffen zugrunde liegen. Die Resignation, von der wir gesprochen haben, müssen wir in Verbindung bringen mit etwas, dessen Entstehung wir auf dem alten Saturn kennengelernt haben: mit der Entstehung der Zeit. Wir haben gesehen, daß mit den Geistern der Zeit, den Archai, die Zeit eigentlich erst auf dem alten Saturn entsteht, und daß es keinen Sinn hat, vor dem alten Saturn von einer «Zeit» zu sprechen. Nun liegt zwar eine Wiederholung darin, aber wir können doch sagen: die Zeit dauert fort. «Dauern» ist schon ein Begriff, der die Zeit in sich enthält. Wenn also gesagt wird, «die Zeit dauert fort», so bedeutet das: Wenn wir in der Akasha-Chronik Saturn und Sonne betrachten, so finden wir auf dem Saturn die Entstehung der Zeit, und auf der Sonne, daß die Zeit auch vorhanden ist. Wenn nun alle Verhältnisse so fortgingen, wie wir sie in den beiden letzten Betrachtungen charakterisiert haben in bezug auf Saturn und Sonne, so würde die Zeit ein Element bilden für alles Geschehen in der Evolution. Wir könnten uns die Zeit von keinem Geschehen in der Evolution wegdenken. Wir haben ja gesehen, daß die Geister der Zeit entstanden sind auf dem alten Saturn, und daß die Zeit allem eingepflanzt ist. Und alles, was wir in Bildern, in Imaginationen bisher über die Evolution gedacht haben, müssen wir uns mit der Zeit in Verbindung denken. Wäre also nur geschehen, was wir angeführt haben: Opferung und schenkende Tugend, so wäre alles der Zeit unterworfen gewesen. Nichts wäre nicht der Zeit unterworfen gewesen. Das heißt, es würde alles dem Entstehen und Vergehen, was ja der Zeit angehört, unterworfen sein.
Diejenigen Cherubim nun, welche verzichtet haben auf das Opfer, auf das, was gleichsam im Opferrauch liegt, sie haben darauf verzichtet aus dem Grunde, weil sie sich damit den Eigenschaften dieses Opferrauches entziehen. Und zu diesen Eigenschaften gehört vor allem die Zeit und damit Entstehen und Vergehen. In dem ganzen Verzicht der Cherubim auf das Opfer liegt daher ein den Zeitverhältnissen Entwachsen der Cherubim. Sie gehen über die Zeit hinaus, entziehen sich dem Unterworfensein unter die Zeit. Damit trennen sich gleichsam die Verhältnisse während der alten Sonnenentwickelung so, daß gewisse Verhältnisse, die in der geraden Linie vom Saturn aus weiter fortgehen, als Opferung und schenkende Tugend der Zeit unterworfen bleiben, während die anderen Verhältnisse, die von den Cherubim dadurch eingeleitet wurden, daß diese Cherubim auf das Opfer verzichteten, sich der Zeit entreißen und damit sich die Ewigkeit, die Dauer, das Nichtunterworfensein dem Entstehen und Vergehen einverleiben. Das ist etwas höchst Merkwürdiges: wir kommen da während der alten Sonnenentwickelung zu einer Trennung in Zeit und Ewigkeit. Es ist durch die Resignation der Cherubim während der Sonnenentwickelung die Ewigkeit errungen worden als eine Eigenschaft gewisser Verhältnisse, die während der Sonnenentwickelung eintraten.
Sahen wir also, indem wir in unsere eigene Seele blickten, gewisse Wirkungen aus dieser Seele dadurch erwachsen, daß der Mensch Verzicht und Resignation in der Seele sich aneignet, so sehen wir, wenn wir zunächst nur von der alten Sonne sprechen, daß von gewissen göttlich-geistigen Wesenheiten Unsterblichkeit, Ewigkeit dadurch errungen ist, daß sie resignierten auf das Opfer und auf das, was aus den sich verbreitenden Gaben der schenkenden Tugend kommen konnte. Sahen wir auf dem Saturn die Zeit entstehen, so sehen wir gewisse Verhältnisse sich der Zeit entreißen während der Sonnenentwickelung. Ich habe allerdings gesagt — ich bitte, das wohl zu beachten -, es bereitet sich dies schon vor während der Saturnzeit, so daß die Ewigkeit nicht erst beginnt während der Sonnenzeit. Aber klar und deutlich zu sehen, so daß man es aussprechen kann in Begriffen, ist es erst während der Sonnenzeit. Es ist auf dem Saturn so schwach erkennbar, dieses Abtrennen der Ewigkeit von der Zeit, daß unsere Begriffe und Worte sich nicht als scharf genug erweisen, um.so etwas schon für den alten Saturn und seine Entwickelung zu charakterisieren.
So haben wir die Bedeutung der Resignation kennengelernt, den Verzicht der Götter während der alten Sonnenzeit und die Erringung der Unsterblichkeit. Was war nun die weitere Folge davon?
Aus der «Geheimwissenschaft im Umriß», die in gewisser Beziehung noch im Bereich der Maja bleiben mußte, wissen wir, daß auf die Sonnenentwickelung die Mondentwickelung folgte, daß am Ende der Sonnenzeit alle Verhältnisse in eine gewisse Dämmerung, in ein kosmisches Chaos eintauchten und wieder als Mond auftauchten. So haben wir denn wieder auftauchen zu sehen die Opferung als Wärme. Also, was auch auf der Sonne blieb als Wärme, das sehen wir auch auf dem Monde als Wärmeverhältnisse auftauchen. Was schenkende Tugend ist, sehen wir als Gas, als Luft auftauchen. Aber auch die Resignation dauert fort, der Verzicht auf die Opferung. Was wir «Resignation» nannten, ist in all diesem drinnen, was auf dem alten Monde vorgeht. Es ist wirklich so: was wir als Resignation erleben können, müssen wir uns ebenso als Kraft in allem auf dem alten Monde denken, von der Sonne herübergekommen, wie wir uns etwas anderes denken, was in der äußeren Welt vorhanden ist. Was Opfer war, erscheint als Wärme in der Maja; was schenkende Tugend war, erscheint in der Maja als Gas oder Luft. Was nun Resignation ist, das erscheint in der äußeren Maja als Flüssigkeit, als Wasser. Wasser ist Maja, und es wäre nicht da in der Welt, wenn nicht geistig zugrunde läge Verzicht oder Resignation. Überall, wo Wasser ist in der Welt, ist Götterverzicht! Ebenso wahr wie Wärme eine Illusion ist, und wie dahinter das Opfer ist, wie Gas oder Luft eine Illusion ist, und dahinter die schenkende Tugend ist, so ist das Wasser als Substanz, als äußere Wirklichkeit nur eine sinnliche Illusion, ein Spiegelbild, und was im Wahrhaftigen davon existiert, ist Resignation irgendwelcher Wesenheiten auf das, was sie von anderen Wesenheiten erhalten. Man möchte sagen, es kann nur Wasser in der Welt rieseln, wenn zugrunde liegt Resignation. Nun wissen wir, daß, während die Sonne zum Monde fortschritt, die Luftverhältnisse sich verdichteten zu den Wasserverhältnissen, Wasser entsteht erst auf dem Monde, auf der Sonne gab es noch kein Wasser. Was wir während der alten Sonnenentwickelung als sich ballende Wolkenmassen sehen, das gerinnt, indem es sich ineinanderdrängt zu einem Dichteren, zum Wasser, das auf dem Monde auftritt, zum Mondenmeere.
Wenn wir dies ins Auge fassen, wird es uns immerhin möglich sein, eine Frage, die aufgeworfen werden kann, zu begreifen. Aus der Resignation wird Wasser; Wasser ist eigentlich in Wahrheit Resignation. Wir bekommen also einen geistigen Begriff ganz sonderbarer Art für das, was das Wasser eigentlich ist. Aber wir können die Frage aufwerfen: Es ist doch ein gewisser Unterschied zwischen dem Zustande, der eingetreten wäre, wenn die Cherubim nicht resigniert hätten, und zwischen dem Zustande, der nun dadurch eingetreten ist, daß sie resigniert haben? Drückt sich dieser Unterschied in irgendeiner Weise aus? — Ja, das tut er. Er drückt sich nämlich dadurch aus, daß nunmehr während der Mondenverhältnisse deutlich die Folgen jener Resignation auftreten. Wenn nämlich diese Resignation nicht eingetreten wäre, wenn die betreffenden verzichtenden Cherubim das ihnen gebrachte Opfer angenommen hätten, so hätten sie — jetzt bildlich gesprochen — den Opferrauch in ihrer eigenen Substanz drinnen gehabt; was sie selber getan hätten, das hätte sich in dem Opferrauch zum Ausdruck gebracht. Nehmen wir an, diese Cherubim hätten dieses oder jenes vollzogen. Dann wäre es erschienen, äußerlich ausgedrückt, durch die sich verändernden Wolken der Luft, das heißt, in der äußeren Gestalt der Luft würde sich ausgedrückt haben, was die nicht resignierenden Cherubim mit der Opfersubstanz gemacht hätten. Nun aber haben sie dieselbe zurückgewiesen und sind dadurch allerdings aus der Sterblichkeit in die Unsterblichkeit, aus der Vergänglichkeit in die Dauer übergegangen. Aber die Opfersubstanz ist zunächst da, sie ist sozusagen entlassen aus den Kräften, die sie sonst aufgenommen hätten, und braucht jetzt nicht zu folgen den Antrieben, den Impulsen der Cherubim, denn diese haben sie entlassen, haben sie zurückgewiesen. Was geschieht nun mit dieser Opfersubstanz? — Es geschieht das, daß andere Wesen sich ihrer bemächtigen, die dadurch, daß sie jetzt diese Opfersubstanz nicht in den Cherubim haben, von den Cherubim unabhängig werden, selbständige Wesen werden, die neben den Cherubim da sind, während sie sonst dirigiert würden von den Cherubim, wenn diese die Opfersubstanz aufgenommen hätten. Darauf beruht die Möglichkeit, daß das Gegenteil von Resignation eintritt: daß Wesenheiten die ausgeflossene Opfersubstanz an sich heranziehen und in ihr handeln. Und das sind die Wesenheiten, die zurückbleiben, so daß das Zurückbleiben eine Folge der Resignation der Cherubim ist. Die Cherubim liefern durch das, worauf sie resignieren, den zurückbleibenden Wesenheiten selbst erst die Möglichkeit zum Zurückbleiben. Dadurch, daß ein Opfer abgewiesen wird, können andere Wesenheiten, die nicht resignieren, die den Wünschen und Begierden sich hingeben und ihre Wünsche zum Ausdruck bringen, sich des Gegenstandes des Opfers, der Opfersubstanz, _ bemächtigen und sind damit in der Möglichkeit, als selbständige Wesenheiten neben die anderen Wesen hinzutreten.
So ist mit dem Hinübergehen der Entwickelung von der Sonne zum Mond, mit dem Unsterblichwerden der Cherubim die Möglichkeit gegeben, daß andere Wesenheiten sich abtrennen in eigener Substantialität von der fortlaufenden Entwickelung der Cherubim, überhaupt von den unsterblichen Wesenheiten. Wir sehen also, indem wir Jetzt den tieferen Grund des Zurückbleibens kennenlernen, daß eigentlich die Urschuld, wenn wir von einer solchen Urschuld sprechen wollen, an diesem Zurückbleiben gar nicht diejenigen haben, welche zurückgeblieben sind. Das ist das Wichtige, daß wir das auffassen. Hätten die Cherubim die Opfer angenommen, so hätten die luziferischen Wesenheiten nicht zurückbleiben können, denn sie hätten keine Gelegenheit gehabt, sich in dieser Substanz zu verkörpern. Damit die Möglichkeit vorhanden war, daß Wesenheiten in dieser Weise selbständig werden, trat vorher der Verzicht ein. Es ist also von der weisen Weltenlenkung so eingerichtet, daß die Götter sich ihre Gegner selbst hervorgerufen haben. Hätten Götter nicht verzichtet, so hätten sich Wesenheiten nicht widersetzen können. Oder wenn wir trivial sprechen wollen, können wir sagen, die Götter hätten gleichsam vorausgesehen: Wenn wir nur so fortschaffen, wie wir es getan haben vom Saturn zur Sonne herüber, so werden niemals freie, aus ihrer Willkür heraus handelnde Wesenheiten entstehen. Es muß, damit solche Wesenheiten entstehen können, die Möglichkeit gegeben sein, daß uns Gegner im Weltenall erstehen, daß wir Widerstände finden in dem, was der Zeit unterworfen ist. Würden wir nur selbst alles anordnen, so würden wir einen solchen Widerstand nicht finden können. Wir könnten es uns sehr leicht machen, dadurch daß wir alles Opfer annähmen, dann würde alleEvolution uns unterworfen sein. Das werden wir aber nicht machen; wir wollen Wesenheiten, die frei von uns sind, die sich widersetzen können. Daher nehmen wir das Opfer nicht an, so daß jene Wesenheiten durch unsere Resignation und dadurch, daß sie das Opfer nehmen, unsere Gegner werden!
So sehen wir, daß wir nicht bei den sogenannten bösen Wesenheiten den Grund des Bösen zu suchen haben, sondern bei den sogenannten guten Wesenheiten, die erst durch ihre Resignation bewirkt haben, daß durch die Wesenheiten, welche das Böse in die Welt bringen konnten, das Böse entstanden ist. Nun könnte jemand sehr leicht einwenden - und ich bitte, diesen Gedanken recht genau auf Ihre Seele wirken zu lassen -: Ich habe bisher eine bessere Meinung von den Göttern gehabt! Ich habe bisher die Meinung von den Göttern gehabt, daß sie das, was menschliche Freiheit in Szene setzen sollte, auch bewirken könnten, ohne die Möglichkeit des Bösen zu schaffen. Wie kommt es, daß alle diese guten Götter so etwas wie die menschliche Freiheit nicht ohne das Böse in die Welt bringen konnten? — Ich möchte dabei erinnern an jenen spanischen König, der die Welt so furchtbar kompliziert gefunden hat und der deshalb einmal gesagt hat: wenn Gott es ihm überlassen hätte, die Welt zu schaffen, so würde er sie einfacher gemacht haben. — Der Mensch mag in seiner Schwäche denken, daß die Welt einfacher gemacht werden könnte; aber die Götter wissen es besser, und sie haben es daher dem Menschen nicht überlassen, die Welt zu schaffen.
Wir könnten vom Gesichtspunkt der Erkenntniswissenschaft aus diese Verhältnisse auch noch genauer charakterisieren. Nehmen wir an, es sollte irgend etwas gestützt werden, und man sagt jemandem, das könnte man so stützen, daß man eine Säule aufrichtet und die Sache daraufrichtet. Da könnte der Betreffende dann sagen: Eigentlich müßte es auch anders zu machen sein! — Ja, warum sollte es nicht auch anders zu machen sein? Oder es könnte jemand sagen, wenn man bei einem Bau ein Dreieck braucht: Warum sollte dieses Dreieck nur drei Ecken haben? Ein Gott könnte vielleicht ein Dreieck so machen, daß es nicht drei Ecken habe! - Aber so viel Sinn es hat, daß ein Dreieck nicht drei Ecken haben soll, so viel Sinn hätte es, daß die Götter die Freiheit hätten schaffen sollen ohne die Möglichkeit des Bösen und des Leides. Wie zum Dreieck drei Ecken gehören, so gehört zur Freiheit die Möglichkeit des Bösen durch die Resignation geistiger Wesenheiten. Das alles gehört zur Resignation der Götter, die dadurch die Evolution geschaffen haben aus dem Unsterblichen heraus, nachdem sie durch den Verzicht auf das Opfer den Grad der Unsterblichkeit genommen hatten, um das Böse wieder zurückzuführen zum Guten. Die Götter haben nicht vermieden das Böse, was allein die Möglichkeit der Freiheit geben konnte. Hätten die Götter das Böse vermieden, so wäre die Welt arm, wäre nicht mannigfaltig. Die Götter mußten das Böse um der Freiheit willen in die Welt kommen lassen, und sie mußten dafür für sich die Macht erringen, das Böse wieder in das Gute zurückzuführen. Diese Macht ist etwas, was als Wirkung nur aus dem Verzicht, aus der Resignation kommen kann.
Religionen sind immer dazu da, um sozusagen in Bildern, in Imaginationen auf die großen Weltengeheimnisse hinzuweisen. Wir haben heute auf uralte Entwickelungsphasen hingewiesen, und indem wir dem Begriff des Opfers und der schenkenden Tugend hinzufügten den Begriff der Resignation, haben wir dadurch wieder einen Schritt in das Wahrhaftige gegenüber der Maja und Illusion hinein gemacht. Solche Bilder und Begriffe wurden den Menschen auch in den Religionen gegeben. Und es gibt etwas innerhalb der biblischen Religion, wodurch sich der Mensch aneignen kann den Begriff des Opfers und der Resignation, des Zurückweisens des Opfers. Das ist die Erzählung von dem opfernden Abraham, der seinen eigenen Sohn dem Gotte darbringen soll, und von dem Verzicht dieses Gottes auf das Opfer des Patriarchen. Wenn wir diesen Begriff des Verzichtes in unsere Seele aufnehmen, dann können solche Anschauungen in uns hineinkommen, wie wir sie schon geäußert haben. Einmal habe ich gesagt: Nehmen wir an, das Opfer des Abraham wäre angenommen und Isaak geopfert worden. Da von ihm das ganze althebräische Volk abstammt, so hätte der Gott durch die Annahme des Opfers dieses ganze Volk von der Erde genommen. Alles, was von Abraham abstammte, schenkte der Gott durch den Verzicht einer Sphäre, die außerhalb seiner ist, entzog es damit seinem Wirkungskreise. Hätte er das Opfer angenommen, so hätte er damit die ganze Sphäre, die sich innerhalb des althebräischen Volkes abspielte, in sich aufgenommen, denn der geopferte Isaak wäre dann bei Gott gewesen. So aber hat er darauf verzichtet und damit diese ganze Evolutionslinie der Erde überlassen. — Alle Begriffe der Resignation, des Opfers, können uns aufgehen bei dem bedeutungsvollen Bilde der Opferung des alten Patriarchen.
Aber noch an einer anderen Stelle unserer irdischen Geschichte können wir dieses Resignieren höherer Wesenheiten finden, und auch da dürfen wir wieder hinweisen auf etwas, worauf wir schon das letzte Mal hingewiesen haben: auf das Bild von Leonardo da Vinci, auf das «Abendmahl». Stellt es doch die Szene vor, wo wir gleichsam den Sinn der Erde vor uns haben, den Christus. Erinnern wir uns, indem wir den ganzen Sinn des Bildes durchdringen wollen, an jene Worte, die wir auch im Evangelium finden: «Könnte ich nicht ein ganzes Heer von Engeln herbeirufen, wenn ich entgehen wollte dem Opfertode?» Was in diesem Moment der Christus annehmen könnte, was ihm selbstverständlich eine leichte Möglichkeit wäre, das wird in Resignation, in Verzicht zurückgewiesen. Und der größte Verzicht des Christus Jesus tritt uns da entgegen, wo er durch seinen Verzicht den Gegner selber in seine Sphäre kommen läßt: den Judas. Wenn wir in dem Christus Jesus dasjenige sehen, was wir in ihm sehen können, so müssen wir in ihm ein Abbild derjenigen Wesenheiten sehen, die wir jetzt eben auf einer gewissen Entwickelungsstufe kennengelernt haben, derjenigen, die auf das Opfer verzichten mußten, derjenigen, deren Natur Resignation ist. Der Christus resigniert auf das, was geschehen würde, wenn er nicht den Judas als seinen Gegner auftreten lassen würde, wie die Götter einst während der Sonnenzeit selber durch Resignation ihre Gegner hervorgerufen haben. So sehen wir diesen Vorgang wiederholt im Bilde auf der Erde: der Christus in der Mitte unter den Zwölfen, mit Judas, der dasteht als der Verräter so, wie die Gegner der kosmischen Mächte auftraten. Damit das in die Entwickelung eintreten kann, was der Menschheit unendlich wert ist, muß sich der Christus selbst seinem Gegner entgegenstellen. Weil wir an einen so gewaltigen kosmischen Augenblick erinnert werden beim Anblick des Abendmahles, wenn wir uns die Worte vorhalten: «Wer mit mir den Bissen in die Schüssel tauchen wird, der wird mich verraten», weil wir da im irdischen Abbilde sehen den Gegner. der Götter selbst den Göttern gegenübergestellt, deshalb macht dieses Bild einen so gewaltigen Eindruck. Deshalb durfte ich oft sagen: Alles, was ein Marsbewohner sehen würde, wenn er heruntersteigen könnte auf die Erde, würde er vielleicht mehr oder weniger interessant finden, wenn er es auch nicht recht verstehen würde. Beim Anblick aber jenes Bildes von Leonardo da Vinci würde er aus einer Stelle des Kosmischen, die mit dem Mars ebenso zusammenhängt wie mit der Erde, mit der das ganze Sonnensystem zusammenhängt, etwas kennenlernen, woraus er den Sinn der Erde erkennen würde. Was da im irdischen Bilde abgebildet ist, das hat für den ganzen Kosmos eine Bedeutung: das Sich-Entgegenstellen gewisser Mächte den unsterblichen göttlichen Mächten. Und indem inmitten seiner Apostel der Christus erscheint, der auf der Erde den Tod überwindet, also den Triumph der Unsterblichkeit zeigt, muß auf jenen bedeutungsvollen universellen Moment hingewiesen werden, der da eintrat, als sich überhaupt Götter absonderten vom zeitlichen Sein und den Sieg über die Zeit errangen, das heißt, unsterblich wurden. Das kann unser Herz fühlen, wenn wir das «Abendmahl» von Leonardo da Vinci anschauen.
Sagen Sie nicht, daß der, welcher mit einem naiven Gemüte das «Abendmahl» anschaut, dies alles doch nicht weiß, was wir heute gesagt haben. Er braucht es nicht zu wissen. Denn darin besteht das geheimnisvoll Tiefe der Menschenseele, daß man gar nicht mit dem Verstande zu wissen braucht, was die Menschenseele fühlt. Weiß die Blume die Gesetze, nach denen sie wächst? Nein, aber sie wächst darum doch. Was braucht die Blume die Gesetze, was die Menschenseele einen Verstand, um zu fühlen das ganz unermeßlich Große, das vorhanden ist, wenn vor dem Auge sich ausbreitet ein Gott und sein Gegner, wenn das Höchste, das ausgedrückt werden kann, der Gegensatz von Unsterblichem und Vergänglichem, vor uns steht? Das braucht man nicht zu wissen, das geht mit magischer Kraft in die Seele über, wenn der Mensch vor diesem Bilde steht, das als Spiegel des Weltensinnes uns da hingemalt ist. Und der Künstler brauchte auch nicht in demselben Sinne ein Okkultist zu sein, um es hinzumalen. Aber in der Seele des Leonardo da Vinci waren die Kräfte, die gerade dieses Höchste, Bedeutungsvollste zum Ausdruck bringen konnten. Deshalb wirken die großen Kunstwerke so ungeheuer, weil sie tief verbunden sind mit dem Sinn der Weltenordnung. In früheren Zeiten waren die Künstler verbunden mit dem Sinn der Weltenordnung in dumpfem Bewußtsein, ohne daß sie es wußten. Aber die Kunst würde ersterben, würde keine Fortsetzung erhalten, wenn nicht in Zukunft die Geisteswissenschaft als Wissen von diesen Dingen der Kunst eine neue Grundlage gäbe.
Die unterbewußte Kunst hat ihre Vergangenheit und mit ihrer Vergangenheit ein Ende erreicht. Die Kunst, welche sich von der Geisteswissenschaft inspirieren läßt, steht im Beginn, im Anfang der Entwicke lung. Das ist die Kunst der Zukunft. So wahr es ist, daß der alte “ Künstler nicht zu wissen brauchte, was den Kunstwerken zugrunde liegt, so wahr ist es, daß es der zukünftige Künstler wissen muß, aber mit jenen Kräften, die wieder eine Art des Unendlichen darstellen, die wieder etwas aus dem Vollinhaltlichen der Seele darstellen. Denn der hat nicht die Geisteswissenschaft, der sie wieder zu einer Verstandeswissenschaft macht, der sie in Schemen und Paradigmen ausdrückt, sondern der hat sie, der bei jedem Begriff, den wir entwickeln - Opfer, schenkende Tugend, Resignation —, der bei jedem Worte etwas empfinden kann, was das Wort, was die Idee selbst zersprengen will, was höchstens in die Vieldeutigkeit der Bilder ausfließen kann.
Schemen wird man hinstellen können, wenn man glaubt, die Entwickelung der Welt vollziehe sich in abstrakten Begriffen. Es geht schon nicht mehr gut mit Schemen, wenn man lebendige Begriffe, wie Opferung, schenkende Tugend und Resignation hinstellen will. Die drei Logoi lassen sich in Schemen noch hinstellen, wo man sich unter Logoi nicht viel mehr denkt als die fünf Buchstaben. Wenn wir die Begriffe Opfer, schenkende Tugend, Resignation vor uns hinstellen wollen, da müssen wir schon solche Bilder vor uns hinmalen, wie wir sie die letzten Male beschrieben haben: die opfernden Throne, die ihr Opfer hinaufsenden zu den Cherubim, der sich verbreitende Opferrauch, die das Licht zurückwerfenden Erzengel und so weiter. Und wenn wir das nächste Mal zum Mondendasein übergehen, werden wir sehen, wie das Bild reicher wird, wie tatsächlich etwas wird hinzutreten müssen wie die Verflüssigung der sich stauenden Wolkenmassen, die rieseln als Mondenmassen, und das Dazutreten der zuckenden Blitze der Seraphim. Da müssen wir zu reicheren Vorstellungen übergehen, gegenüber denen man sagen wird: Die Zukunft der Menschheit wird schon die Möglichkeit finden, auch das künstlerische Material, die künstlerischen Mittel herbeizuschaffen, um für die äußere Welt zum Ausdruck zu bringen, was sonst nur in der Akasha-Chronik zu lesen sein kann.
Third Lecture
In our last two reflections here, we have attempted to point out how the spiritual can be sought behind all the material phenomena of our world. We have attempted to characterize first the spiritual that is found behind the phenomena of heat, then behind the phenomena of flowing air. Since we had to go back to the very early, primordial past of our development in order to provide such characteristics, we had to look into our own soul life when describing the spiritual conditions that underlie the material world. For it is obviously necessary to take the ideas with which one characterizes something from somewhere. Words alone are not enough; we must have very specific ideas. We have seen that the spiritual conditions to which we must refer are in part so far removed from everything that humans currently experience and know that we ourselves had to appeal to rare states and conditions that are not at all common in our own mental life. We have seen that we had to seek the deepest essence of all heat and fire conditions far beyond what is outwardly physical fire or heat. Certainly, it must seem quite grotesque to people of the present day when the essence of all fire and heat conditions in the world is recognized as the sacrifice of very specific beings whom we encountered in the ancient Saturn state of the Earth in a certain stage of development, the thrones that offered their sacrifice to the cherubim at that time. And in truth, we must say that such a sacrifice, as it originated in the evolution of the world, exists in everything that appears to us externally, in Maya or illusion, in the conditions of heat or fire.
Likewise, we recognized last time that behind everything we can call flowing air or flowing gases there lies something very, very distant, that which we have called “giving virtue,” the devoted outpouring of the essence of spiritual beings. This lies in every breath of wind, in all flowing air. What is perceived physically on the outside is really only an illusion, a Maya; and we only have the right idea when we progress from Maya to the spiritual. In the truth of the world, fire or warmth or air are just as little present as the human being who sees himself in the mirror is present in the mirror image. For just as a reflection is essentially an illusion in relation to the human being, so fire or warmth or air are illusions, and the truths behind them are in reality like the true human being in relation to his reflection. It is not fire or air that we must seek in the world of truth, but sacrifice and the virtue of giving.
In doing so, we have ascended by seeing, as it were, the giving virtue joining the sacrifice, from the old Saturn life to the old Sun life. Within the latter, that is, the second cosmic embodiment of our Earth, we find something that will bring us one step closer to the true conditions of our development. And today we must reintroduce a concept that belongs to the world of truth as opposed to the world of illusion. Before we move on to the actual conditions of development, let us acquire a certain concept. We will proceed from the following.
When a person does something in their outer life, when they accomplish something, this is usually based on an impulse of their will. Whatever a person does, whether it is a movement of the hand or the greatest deed, there is always an impulse of the will behind it. Everything else that leads to an action, to an accomplishment by the person, proceeds from this. People will initially say that a strong, powerful deed, which is supposed to bring much good and blessing, requires a strong impulse of will, and that a less significant deed requires a weaker impulse of will. And in general, people will be inclined to assume that the magnitude of the deed depends on the strength of the impulse of will.
However, it is only true to a certain extent that we achieve great things in the world when we strengthen our will. From a certain point on, this is no longer the case. Certain deeds that humans can do, deeds that relate primarily to the spiritual world, do not depend on the strengthening of our impulses of will, strangely enough. Certainly, in the physical world in which we live, the magnitude of the deed will depend on the magnitude of the impulse of will, because we must exert ourselves more if we want to achieve more. But in the spiritual world, this is not the case at all; rather, the opposite occurs. There, we can say that the greatest deeds, the greatest effects, do not require a strengthening of the positive impulse of the will, but rather a certain resignation, a renunciation. We can start from the smallest, purely spiritual facts. We do not achieve a certain spiritual effect by displaying our desires as much as possible or by being as busy as possible. In the spiritual world, we achieve certain effects by taming our desires and renouncing their satisfaction.
Let us assume that a person has set their mind on achieving something in the world through inner spiritual effects. Then they must prepare themselves for this by learning, above all, to suppress their desires and cravings. And while one becomes stronger in the physical world, let us say, by eating well, by nourishing oneself well and thereby gaining more strength, one will—this is only a description, not advice!—achieve something significant in the spiritual world in a certain way precisely when one fasts or does something else to suppress and tame one's desires and cravings. And among the greatest spiritual effects, let us say magical effects, there is always such a preparation, which is connected with the renunciation of desires, cravings, and impulses of the will that arise within us. The less we “want,” the more we say to ourselves: We let life flow past us and do not desire this or that, but take things as karma throws them at us — the more we accept karma and its effects and remain calm in renouncing everything else we want to achieve in this life, the stronger we become, for example, in terms of the power of our thoughts.
In the case of a person who is very desirous, who loves above all else to eat and drink well and is also desirous in other ways, it will become apparent, if he is a teacher or educator, for example, that the words he addresses to his pupils do not achieve much; they go in one ear and out the other. He will then think that this is the fault of his pupils. But that is not always the case. A person who has a higher view of life, who lives moderately, who eats only as much as is necessary to sustain life, who is primarily concerned with accepting the things that fate gives him, will gradually notice that his words have greater power; indeed, his gaze can have great power, and it does not even need to be a look; he only needs to be next to the pupil, to have an encouraging thought that he does not even express: this will be transferred to the pupil. All this depends on the degree of renunciation, of resignation towards what people otherwise demand.
Now, for spiritual activities, in order to achieve spiritual effects in the higher worlds, the right path is that which leads through renunciation. In this respect, there are many delusions; and delusions do not lead to the right effects, because they look so similar on the outside. You all know what is called asceticism, self-torment, in ordinary life. In many cases, this self-torment can be nothing less than a form of lust, which the person concerned chooses out of desire, for example, in order to achieve a lot, or even out of another source of desire, for the sake of lust itself. Then asceticism has no effect, for it only has meaning when it occurs as an accompanying phenomenon of renunciation already rooted in the spiritual. Let us take up this concept: the concept of creative renunciation, of creative resignation. It is immensely important that we take up this renunciation, this creative resignation, which we can experience in our souls, as a concept that is far removed from everyday life: then we will be able to take a step deeper into human evolution. For something like this happens in the course of evolution, for example in the transition from solar conditions to lunar conditions. Something like resignation happens in the realm of the beings of the higher worlds, which we know are connected with the progress of Earth's evolution. Let us once again consider the ancient solar evolution. But let us first draw attention to something we already know, but which may still seem puzzling to us in some respects.
We have repeatedly drawn attention to such processes in evolution that we have to attribute to beings that have remained behind in the course of evolution. We know, for example, that the Luciferic beings intervene in our human evolution. We have repeatedly had to point out that these Luciferic beings intervene in our astral body during the Earth's evolution because they did not reach the stage of development they could have attained during the ancient lunar evolution. We have often used the trivial comparison that it is not only in our schools that pupils repeat a year, but that world beings in the great cosmic evolution also remain at their stages of development and later intervene in the stages of development of beings, causing similar effects to those of the Luciferic beings who remained behind on the old moon, where human beings lived on Earth.
In contrast, one could very easily raise the thought: Actually, these beings are defective beings, weaklings of world evolution; for why have they remained behind? That is one thought that may occur to us. But the other thought we can also grasp is this: that human beings would never have attained their freedom, their ability to decide for themselves, if the Luciferic beings had not remained on the moon. So, on the one hand, human beings owe the Luciferic beings for the evil that they have desires, instincts, and passions in their astral body, which continually push them down from a certain level of development and draw them toward the lower regions of their being. On the other hand, however, if this were not the case, if man could not become evil, if he could not stray from the good through the power of the Luciferic beings in his astral body, he could not act freely, he could not have what we call freedom of will, arbitrariness. We must therefore say that we also owe our freedom to the Luciferic beings. From this it is already clear that the one-sided view that the Luciferic beings only bring human beings down is not correct, but that human beings must regard their backwardness as something good, as something without which they could not have attained their human dignity in the true sense of the word.
Now, underlying all that we call such a lagging behind on the part of the Luciferic and Ahrimanic beings is something much deeper, something that already confronts us on the old Saturn, but is so difficult to recognize there that we can hardly find words in any language to characterize what lies at the basis of the old Saturn. When we move on to the old solar existence, however, we can characterize it quite clearly if we consider the concept of resignation, of renunciation, which we described earlier. For underlying all such lagging behind of beings, all such influence through lagging behind, is the resignation or renunciation of higher beings. We can thus see that the following occurs on the sun. We have said that the thrones, the spirits of the will, offer sacrifices to the cherubim. As we saw last time, they do not offer these sacrifices only during the Saturn period, but continue to do so during the Sun period. So we also have the image here of the thrones, the spirits of the will, offering sacrifices to the cherubim. And in this sacrifice lies the actual essence of all the heat or fire conditions existing in the world. During the solar period, we can now clearly observe the following when we look back in the Akashic Records: the thrones sacrifice and remain with their sacrificial activity; so that we have the sacrificing thrones, we also have a number of cherubim, to whom we see the sacrifice ascend, as they take into themselves what flows from the sacrifice, the warmth. But a number of cherubim do something else: they renounce the sacrifice and do not take part in the offering. Therefore, we must add something to the image we presented to our souls last time.
In this image, we have the sacrificing thrones and the cherubim who accept the sacrifice; but we also have cherubim who do not accept the sacrifice, but return what comes to them as a sacrifice. This is extremely interesting to follow in the Akashic Records. For now, through the giving virtue of the spirits of wisdom flowing into the warmth of the sacrifice, we see the sacrificial smoke rising during the old Sun, which we have said is then thrown back by the archangels in the form of light from the outermost circumference of the Sun. But now we see something else, as if something completely different were present within the old sun space: sacrificial smoke, which is now not merely reflected back into the light by the archangels, but is not accepted by the cherubim, so that it flows back, accumulates, and we have accumulating sacrificial clouds in the sun space: sacrifice that rises, sacrifice that descends; sacrifice that is accepted, sacrifice that is renounced, that returns to itself. This encounter between the actual spiritual cloud formations in the old sun space is found, as it were, between what we last called the outer and the inner, these two dimensions on the sun, like a separating layer; so that in the middle we have the sacrificial thrones, then the cherubim on high who accept the sacrifice, then those cherubim who do not accept the sacrifice but hold it back. This holding back creates a ring cloud, as it were; and on the very outside we have the rejected masses of light.
Imagine this image vividly: that we have this old sun space, this old sun mass, like a cosmic sphere, outside of which nothing can be imagined, so that we only have to think of the space up to the archangels. Let us further imagine that in the middle we have this ring formation from the meeting accepted and rejected sacrifices. From these accepted and rejected sacrifices, something arises within the old sun that we can call a doubling of the entire solar substance, a splitting apart. The sun in this ancient time can only be compared to an external figure if we compare it to our present Saturn figure: the sphere surrounded by a ring, in which these accumulating sacrificial masses throw themselves inward, what is in the middle, and what is outside is arranged like a ring mass outside. Thus, we have actually divided the substance of the sun into two parts through the power of the accumulating sacrificial forces.
What is the effect of this renunciation of sacrifice on the part of certain cherubim? This is an extremely difficult chapter we are approaching, and you will only be able to grasp what lies in the terms that are now being discussed through slow meditation. Only by thinking long and hard about the terms that are given will you discover the realities that underlie them. We must connect the resignation we have spoken of with something whose origin we learned about on ancient Saturn: the origin of time. We have seen that time actually only comes into being on ancient Saturn with the spirits of time, the archai, and that it makes no sense to speak of “time” before ancient Saturn. Now, there is a repetition here, but we can still say: time continues. “Continuing” is already a concept that contains time within itself. So when we say, “time continues,” it means that when we look at Saturn and the Sun in the Akashic Chronicle, we find the emergence of time on Saturn and the existence of time on the Sun. If all conditions continued as we have characterized them in the last two considerations in relation to Saturn and the Sun, time would form an element for everything that happens in evolution. We could not imagine time apart from any event in evolution. We have seen that the spirits of time arose on ancient Saturn and that time is implanted in everything. And everything we have thought about evolution in images and imaginations so far must be thought of in connection with time. If only what we have mentioned had happened: sacrifice and the virtue of giving, then everything would have been subject to time. Nothing would have been exempt from time. That means everything would have been subject to arising and passing away, which is what time is all about.
Those cherubim who renounced sacrifice, that which lies, as it were, in the smoke of sacrifice, renounced it because they thereby withdrew themselves from the properties of this sacrificial smoke. And these properties include above all time and thus coming into being and passing away. In the cherubim's complete renunciation of sacrifice lies, therefore, their outgrowing the conditions of time. They go beyond time, withdraw themselves from being subject to time. In this way, the conditions during the old solar evolution separate themselves, so that certain conditions, which continue in a straight line from Saturn, remain subject to time as sacrifice and the giving virtue, while the other conditions, which were initiated by the cherubim by renouncing sacrifice, break away from time and thus incorporate eternity, duration, and non-subjection to arising and passing away. This is something highly remarkable: during the ancient solar evolution, we arrive at a separation between time and eternity. It is through the resignation of the cherubim during the solar evolution that eternity was achieved as a characteristic of certain conditions that arose during the solar evolution.
If we looked into our own souls and saw certain effects arising from the soul as a result of human beings acquiring renunciation and resignation in their souls, we would see, if we speak only of the old Sun, that certain divine-spiritual beings achieved immortality and eternity by resigning themselves to sacrifice and to what might come from the spreading gifts of the giving virtue. If we saw time coming into being on Saturn, we see certain conditions breaking away from time during the development of the Sun. I have said, however — and I ask you to note this carefully — that this is already being prepared during the Saturn period, so that eternity does not begin only during the Sun period. But it is only during the Sun period that it can be seen clearly and distinctly, so that it can be expressed in concepts. This separation of eternity from time is so faintly discernible on Saturn that our concepts and words are not sharp enough to characterize something like this for the old Saturn and its development.
Thus we have learned the meaning of resignation, the renunciation of the gods during the ancient Sun period, and the attainment of immortality. What was the further consequence of this?
From “The Secret Science in Outline,” which in a certain sense had to remain within the realm of Maya, we know that the solar evolution was followed by the lunar evolution, that at the end of the solar era all conditions plunged into a kind of twilight, into a cosmic chaos, and reappeared as the moon. Thus we see the sacrifice reappear as warmth. So whatever remained on the sun as warmth, we also see reappearing on the moon as warmth conditions. What is the virtue of giving, we see reappearing as gas, as air. But resignation also continues, the renunciation of sacrifice. What we called “resignation” is contained in all that goes on in the old moon. It is really so: what we can experience as resignation, we must also think of as a force in everything on the old moon, coming over from the sun, just as we think of something else that is present in the outer world. What was sacrifice appears as warmth in Maya; what was giving virtue appears in Maya as gas or air. What resignation is now appears in outer Maya as liquid, as water. Water is Maya, and it would not be there in the world if renunciation or resignation did not lie at its spiritual foundation. Wherever there is water in the world, there is renunciation of the gods! Just as true as warmth is an illusion, and behind it is sacrifice, just as gas or air is an illusion, and behind it is the gift of virtue, so water as a substance, as external reality, is only a sensual illusion, a mirror image, and what truly exists of it is the resignation of certain beings to what they receive from other beings. One might say that water can only trickle in the world if resignation is at the root of it. Now we know that as the sun progressed toward the moon, the air conditions condensed into water conditions; water only arises on the moon; there was no water on the sun. What we see during the ancient development of the sun as gathering masses of clouds coagulates by pressing together into a denser form, into water, which appears on the moon as the seas of the moon.
If we consider this, we will at least be able to understand a question that may be raised. Resignation becomes water; water is actually resignation in truth. We thus obtain a very special spiritual concept of what water actually is. But we can raise the question: Is there not a certain difference between the state that would have come about if the cherubim had not resigned themselves, and the state that has now come about as a result of their resignation? Is this difference expressed in any way? Yes, it is. It is expressed in the fact that the consequences of that resignation are now clearly apparent during the lunar phases. For if this resignation had not occurred, if the cherubim who renounced their task had accepted the sacrifice brought to them, they would have had — figuratively speaking — the sacrificial smoke within their own substance; what they themselves had done would have been expressed in the sacrificial smoke. Let us assume that these cherubim had done this or that. Then it would have appeared, expressed outwardly, through the changing clouds in the air, that is, in the outer form of the air, what the cherubim who did not resign themselves would have done with the sacrificial substance. But now they have rejected it and thereby passed from mortality to immortality, from transience to permanence. But the sacrificial substance is still there, so to speak, released from the forces that would otherwise have absorbed it, and now does not need to follow the impulses of the cherubim, for they have released it, rejected it. What happens now to this sacrificial substance? — What happens is that other beings take possession of it, and because they now do not have this sacrificial substance in the cherubim, they become independent of the cherubim, becoming independent beings that exist alongside the cherubim, whereas otherwise they would be directed by the cherubim if the latter had absorbed the sacrificial substance. This is the basis for the possibility that the opposite of resignation occurs: that beings draw the sacrificed substance to themselves and act within it. And these are the beings that remain behind, so that their remaining behind is a consequence of the resignation of the cherubim. Through what they resign themselves to, the cherubim themselves provide the remaining beings with the possibility of remaining behind. By rejecting a sacrifice, other beings who do not resign themselves, who give in to their desires and cravings and express their wishes, can seize the object of the sacrifice, the sacrificial substance, and thus have the opportunity to join the other beings as independent beings.
Thus, with the transition of evolution from the sun to the moon, with the cherubim becoming immortal, the possibility is given for other beings to separate themselves in their own substantiality from the ongoing evolution of the cherubim, indeed from the immortal beings altogether. Now that we know the deeper reason for remaining behind, we see that the original guilt, if we want to speak of such a thing, does not lie with those who remained behind. It is important that we understand this. If the cherubim had accepted the sacrifices, the Luciferic beings would not have been able to remain behind, for they would not have had the opportunity to incarnate themselves in this substance. In order for the possibility to exist for beings to become independent in this way, renunciation had to take place beforehand. It is therefore arranged by the wise guidance of the world that the gods brought their opponents into being themselves. If the gods had not renounced, the beings would not have been able to resist. Or, to put it more trivially, we can say that the gods foresaw, as it were, that if they continued as they had done from Saturn to the Sun, free beings acting out of their own will would never arise. In order for such beings to arise, there must be the possibility that opponents arise in the universe, that we encounter resistance in that which is subject to time. If we alone were to arrange everything, we would not be able to encounter such resistance. We could make things very easy for ourselves by accepting every sacrifice, and then all evolution would be subject to us. But we will not do that; we want beings that are free from us, that can resist us. Therefore, we do not accept sacrifice, so that those beings become our opponents through our resignation and through their acceptance of sacrifice!
So we see that we must not seek the cause of evil in the so-called evil beings, but in the so-called good beings, who, through their resignation, have caused evil to arise through the beings that were able to bring evil into the world. Now someone could very easily object—and I ask you to let this thought sink deeply into your soul—that you have had a better opinion of the gods up to now! I have always believed that the gods could bring about what human freedom was supposed to bring about without creating the possibility of evil. How is it that all these good gods could not bring something like human freedom into the world without evil? — I would like to remind you of that Spanish king who found the world so terribly complicated and who therefore once said: if God had left it to him to create the world, he would have made it simpler. — Man, in his weakness, may think that the world could be made simpler; but the gods know better, and they have therefore not left it to man to create the world.
From the point of view of epistemology, we could characterize these relationships even more precisely. Let us assume that something needs to be supported, and someone says that this could be done by erecting a pillar and placing the object on top of it. The person concerned could then say: Actually, it should be possible to do it differently! — Yes, why shouldn't it be possible to do it differently? Or someone might say, if a triangle is needed in a building: Why should this triangle only have three corners? A god could perhaps make a triangle that doesn't have three corners! — But as much sense as it makes that a triangle shouldn't have three corners, it would make just as much sense that the gods should have created freedom without the possibility of evil and suffering. Just as three corners belong to a triangle, so the possibility of evil through the resignation of spiritual beings belongs to freedom. All this belongs to the resignation of the gods, who thereby created evolution out of the immortal, after they had renounced sacrifice and thus removed the degree of immortality in order to bring evil back to good. The gods did not avoid evil, which alone could give the possibility of freedom. If the gods had avoided evil, the world would be poor and not diverse. The gods had to allow evil to come into the world for the sake of freedom, and in return they had to gain the power to bring evil back to good. This power is something that can only come from renunciation, from resignation.
Religions always exist to point to the great mysteries of the world in images and imaginings, so to speak. Today we have referred to ancient phases of development, and by adding the concept of resignation to the concepts of sacrifice and the virtue of giving, we have taken another step toward truth in contrast to Maya and illusion. Such images and concepts were also given to people in religions. And there is something within the biblical religion through which people can acquire the concept of sacrifice and resignation, of rejecting sacrifice. This is the story of the sacrificial Abraham, who is supposed to offer his own son to God, and of God's renunciation of the patriarch's sacrifice. If we take this concept of renunciation into our souls, then views such as those we have already expressed can enter into us. I once said: Let us assume that Abraham's sacrifice was accepted and Isaac was sacrificed. Since the entire ancient Hebrew people descended from him, God would have taken this entire people from the earth by accepting the sacrifice. Everything that descended from Abraham, God gave away by renouncing a sphere that is outside of Him, thereby removing it from His sphere of influence. If He had accepted the sacrifice, He would have taken into Himself the entire sphere that existed within the ancient Hebrew people, for the sacrificed Isaac would then have been with God. But He refrained from doing so and thus left this entire line of evolution to the earth. All concepts of resignation and sacrifice can be understood in the meaningful image of the sacrifice of the ancient patriarch.
But we can find this resignation of higher beings in another place in our earthly history, and here too we can refer to something we already mentioned last time: Leonardo da Vinci's painting, “The Last Supper.” It depicts the scene where we have, as it were, the meaning of the Earth before us, Christ. As we try to penetrate the whole meaning of the painting, let us remember those words that we also find in the Gospel: “Could I not call upon a whole army of angels if I wanted to escape the sacrificial death?” What Christ could accept at that moment, what would naturally be an easy option for him, is rejected in resignation, in renunciation. And the greatest renunciation of Christ Jesus confronts us where, through his renunciation, he allows his enemy himself to enter his sphere: Judas. If we see in Christ Jesus what we can see in him, then we must see in him an image of those beings whom we have just come to know at a certain stage of development, those who had to renounce sacrifice, those whose nature is resignation. Christ resigns himself to what would happen if he did not allow Judas to appear as his adversary, just as the gods themselves once brought forth their adversaries through resignation during the Sun period. We see this process repeated in the picture on earth: Christ in the middle among the twelve, with Judas standing there as the traitor, just as the adversaries of the cosmic powers appeared. In order for what is infinitely valuable to humanity to enter into development, Christ must confront his adversary himself. Because we are reminded of such a powerful cosmic moment when we look at the Last Supper and hear the words, “He who dips the bread with me will betray me,” because we see in the earthly image the enemy of the gods himself standing opposite the gods, this image makes such a powerful impression. That is why I have often said: Everything that a Martian would see if he could descend to Earth, he would perhaps find more or less interesting, even if he did not understand it properly. But when he saw that picture by Leonardo da Vinci, he would learn something from a place in the cosmos that is connected with Mars as well as with Earth, with which the entire solar system is connected, and from this he would recognize the meaning of Earth. What is depicted in the earthly image has meaning for the entire cosmos: the opposition of certain powers to the immortal divine powers. And in that Christ appears in the midst of his apostles, overcoming death on Earth and thus demonstrating the triumph of immortality, reference must be made to that significant universal moment that occurred when the gods separated themselves from temporal existence and achieved victory over time, that is, became immortal. Our hearts can feel this when we look at Leonardo da Vinci's “The Last Supper.”
Do not say that those who look at “The Last Supper” with a naive mind do not know all that we have said today. They do not need to know it. For it is the mysterious depth of the human soul that one does not need to know with the intellect what the human soul feels. Does the flower know the laws according to which it grows? No, but it grows nonetheless. What does the flower need laws for, what does the human soul need a mind for, in order to feel the immeasurably great that is present when a god and his adversary spread out before our eyes, when the highest that can be expressed, the contrast between the immortal and the transitory, stands before us? One does not need to know this; it passes into the soul with magical power when one stands before this image, which is painted there as a mirror of the meaning of the world. And the artist did not need to be an occultist in the same sense in order to paint it. But in the soul of Leonardo da Vinci were the forces that could express precisely this highest, most meaningful thing. That is why great works of art have such an enormous effect, because they are deeply connected with the meaning of the world order. In earlier times, artists were connected with the meaning of the world order in a vague consciousness, without knowing it. But art would die out, would have no continuation, if spiritual science did not give it a new foundation in the future as knowledge of these things of art.
Subconscious art has its past, and with its past it has reached an end. Art inspired by spiritual science is at the beginning, at the dawn of its development. This is the art of the future. As true as it is that the old artist did not need to know what lay at the basis of works of art, it is equally true that the artist of the future must know, but with those forces that once again represent a kind of infinity, that once again represent something from the full content of the soul. For it is not the spiritual science that turns it back into an intellectual science, that expresses it in schemas and paradigms, but rather the one who, with every concept we develop—sacrifice, giving virtue, resignation—with every word, can feel something that wants to burst the word, the idea itself, something that can at most flow out into the ambiguity of images.
Schemes can be put forward if one believes that the development of the world takes place in abstract concepts. Schemes no longer work when one wants to put forward living concepts such as sacrifice, giving virtue, and resignation. The three Logoi can still be put into schemes where one thinks of Logoi as little more than the five letters. If we want to put the concepts of sacrifice, giving virtue, and resignation before us, we must paint pictures such as those we have described in recent times: the sacrificial thrones sending their sacrifices up to the cherubim, the spreading smoke of sacrifice, the archangels reflecting the light, and so on. And when we move on to the moon existence next time, we will see how the image becomes richer, how something will actually have to be added, such as the liquefaction of the accumulating cloud masses, which trickle down as masses of moons, and the addition of the flickering lightning bolts of the seraphim. We must move on to richer ideas, about which it will be said: The future of humanity will find the possibility of bringing forth the artistic material, the artistic means, to express to the outer world what can otherwise only be read in the Akashic Records.