Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

The Gospel of St. Matthew
GA 123

11 September 1910, Bern

Lecture XI

The Temptation is presented in the Gospel of St. Matthew as an account of a particular form of Initiation. The story is followed by indications of what Christ Jesus was to mean, firstly to His disciples. Not only was He to be the expounder of the ancient teachings in an entirely new form but a living force—if this word may be used—a health-giving force for men. This is demonstrated in the healings.

In the lecture yesterday we went on to consider a subject which, if it is to be understood, calls for a certain measure of goodwill arising from spiritual-scientific knowledge acquired through the years. We spoke of the unique, living quality of teaching imparted through the transmission of forces from Christ Jesus into the souls of His disciples. An attempt was made to express a great mystery in words of human language and to indicate the nature of the teaching given by Christ Jesus to His disciples. We may think of Christ Jesus Himself as a focal point, a focal centre, as it were, for forces that were to stream from the Macrocosm into the conditions of life on the Earth and into the souls of the disciples. Such forces could be marshalled only by powers that were concentrated in Christ Himself. Through Him, forces which otherwise stream into man unconsciously during sleep, streamed to the disciples as illuminating, life-giving forces of the Cosmos itself. To characterize these forces in any detail is of course only possible by studying the difference in cosmic constellations, and it is this mystery, as presented in the Gospel of St. Matthew, to which we shall give attention to-day. In the first place, however, it must be realised that the disciples had inevitably become wiser in regard to conditions on Earth because thc powers and forces of Christ Jesus had poured upon them. In diverse ways and degrees they had become more mature, had acquired more living wisdom.

A very significant phenomenon in the development of one of the disciples is presented to us, but to be understood it must be contemplated in a vast setting. And here the fact must be kept firmly in mind that the individual man himself progresses together with evolving humanity. In the post-Atlantean era we have passed through incarnation after incarnation in the ancient Indian, the ancient Persian, the Egypto-Chaldean and the Greco-Latin civilization-epochs, in order to receive some-thing from the environment and the prevailing conditions of the times. That is how progress is made.

What does development through the epochs of human evolution really mean? From elementary Anthroposophy we know of the different members of man's being: physical body, etheric body, astral body, sentient soul, intellectual or mind-soul, spiritual or consciousness-soul. The higher members still to be developed are Spirit-Self, Life-Spirit, Spirit-Man. Something quite definite is achieved for each of these members in the several epochs of post-Atlantean civilization. Thus in the first epoch, forces enhancing the capacities of the etheric body were instilled into man. Such forces had been implanted in his physical body during the last periods of the Atlantean era and the first gifts to be bestowed in the post-Atlantean era were those imparted to the etheric body during the epoch of ancient Indian culture. During the epoch of ancient Persia, forces were implanted in man's astral body, or sentient body; during the Egypto-Chaldean and Greco-Latin epochs in the sentient soul and intellectual or mind-soul respectively; and we are living now in the age when the forces connected with this line of progress are gradually to be instilled into the spiritual or consciousness-soul. No very great advance has yet been made in this respect. In the future sixth post-Atlantean epoch the forces of the Spirit-Self will be implanted in human nature, and in the seventh epoch those of the Life-Spirit. And then we glimpse a far, far distant future, when Spirit-Man, or Atma, is to be inculcated into normal human nature.

We will now think of this process of development in relation to the individual human being. Those who knew the truth of these things from the Mysteries always pictured man as we must picture him now and as the disciples too had to learn to picture him through the enlightenment that had come to them from Christ Jesus. In a human being—either as he is to-day or also as he was at the time of Christ Jesus—there are rudiments or seeds, just as there are in a plant; they are already present when the plant has developed only leaves, and not yet flower and fruit. Looking at such a plant we know that although it now has leaves only, there already lie within it the germinal beginnings of flower and fruit, and that these will develop if growth proceeds in the normal and regular way. As surely as flower and fruit will grow out of the plant although at first it has green leaves only, as surely will the consciousness-soul arise in the human being—who in the days of Christ Jesus had developed only the sentient soul and the intellectual or mind-soul. The consciousness-soul then prepares to receive the Spirit-Self, in order that the highest triad may come as a new divine-spiritual gift to man. Therefore we can say: Through the contents and qualities of his soul, man's development is like that of a plant which, to begin with, has green leaves only but subsequently both flower and fruit. Out of sentient soul, mind-soul and spiritual or consciousness-soul, man unfolds something like a flower of his being, holding it in readiness to receive a divine power that comes down to him from above—this power being the Spirit-Self which enables him to reach further stages along the path leading to the heights of evolution.

In men who were living at the time of Christ Jesus the intellectual or mind-soul had developed in the perfectly normal way as their highest soul-principle; but although the intellectual or mind-soul was not able to receive into itself the Spirit-Self, there was to develop, as the child of the intellectual soul, the spiritual or consciousness-soul into which the Spirit-Self could descend.

What was the expression used in the Mysteries when referring to this flower that was to unfold from man's own nature? How was this growth defined in the environment of Christ Jesus when it was a matter of indicating that the disciples were to make a true advance in their development? Translated into our language, the expression used was ‘Son of Man’. The Greek υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου has by no means the restricted meaning of our ‘son’ as ‘son of a father’ but signifies the successor of a living being, an entity that evolves from a living being like the blossom or flower of a plant on which hitherto there have been leaves only. Hence in the era before normally developed men had unfolded the consciousness-soul as the flower of their nature they had nothing of the ‘Son of Man’ in them. But there must always be some who are in advance of their generation, who already bear within them in an earlier epoch the knowledge and potentialities of a later one. In the fourth epoch—when normally only the intellectual or mind-soul had developed—there would always have been some among the leaders of men who, although their outward appearance was similar to that of others, had already unfolded the seed of the spiritual or consciousness-soul into which the Spirit-Self sends its radiance.—And there were indeed such ‘Sons of Men’. Hence it behooved the disciples of Christ Jesus to recognize and learn to understand the nature of these leaders.

To test how far this was understood by His intimate disciples, Christ Jesus asked them: Tell me, of which human beings it can be said that they are ‘Sons of Men’ in this generation?—That is approximately how the question would have to be formulated in accordance with the original Aramaic text of St. Matthew's Gospel. (I have already said that although the Greek version, if it is thoroughly understood, is certainly better than that produced by any modern scholarship, a great deal was inevitably obscured in the process of translation from the Aramaic original.) We must picture Christ Jesus standing before His disciples and asking them: Which individuals of the previous generations in the Greco-Latin epoch are held to have been ‘Sons of Men’? The disciples then spoke of Elias, John the Baptist, Jeremias, and other prophets. Through the power transmitted to them by Christ the disciples knew that those leaders of men had been the recipients of forces enabling them to become bearers of the ‘Son of Man’. On the same occasion, the disciple who is usually called Peter, gave still another answer.

To understand this answer we must keep firmly in mind what has been said in these lectures about the mission of Christ Jesus as indicated in the Gospel of St. Matthew, namely that through the Christ Impulse it was possible for men to develop Ego-consciousness in the fullest sense, to bring to blossom what is implicit in the am'. In other words : even in the actual process of Initiation, men were in future to retain all along the paths leading into the higher worlds the full Ego-consciousness normally possessed only on the physical plane. This was made possible through Christ's existence on the Earth. We can therefore say: Christ Jesus is the representative, the embodiment, of the power which imparts to mankind full consciousness of the ‘I am.’

I have already called attention to the fact that the interpretations of the Gospels put forward by rationalists, let alone by declared sceptics, do not usually emphasize the points of real significance. It is insisted that certain phrases in the Gospels and other books of the Bible were in existence previously, for example the Beatitudes. But the shade of meaning that was not there previously—and this is the gist of the whole matter—is that what could not then be attained by the human being in full Ego-consciousness, could now be attained by him through the Christ Impulse! This is of the very greatest significance. I have spoken of each Beatitude and have shown that the words of the first should be: ‘Blessed are they who are beggars for the spirit’—because a man is poor in spirit who on account of the advancing evolution of human consciousness can no longer look into the spiritual world with the old clairvoyance. But to such men Christ gives this consolation and enlightenment: Although they can no longer see into the spiritual world with the organs of the old clairvoyance, vision of the world will now be possible through their own Ego, for through themselves they will find the Kingdoms of Heaven! So too the second Beatitude: ‘Blessed are they that mourn.’ They will no longer be dependent upon the faculty of the old clairvoyance for reaching the spiritual world, for they will now achieve this by developing their own Ego. But in order that this may come to pass the Ego must take into itself more and more of the power that was anchored once on Earth in a unique Being—in Christ.

Men of the modern age ought really to give a little thought to the following.—It is not for nothing that Greek words of vital importance occur in every Beatitude: Ὅτι αὐτῶν ἐστιν ἡ βασιλεία τῶν οὐρανῶν Thus the first sentence, ‘Blessed are they who are beggars for the spirit’, should be followed by the words: ‘In themselves’—or ‘through themselves’—‘they will find the Kingdoms of Heaven.’ The words, ‘In themselves’ are always accentuated, in the second sentence, in the third, and so on.

Forgive me if by a trivial analogy I now call attention to something of importance at the present time. People will have to resolve not to apply the word ‘auton’(αὐτῶν)—as in our automobile—to machines only or to take it in an entirely external sense. They will have to understand in a spiritual sense too the quality or activity implied by ὅτι αὐτῶν—‘self-engendered activity’. Our contemporaries would do well to take this admonition to heart. They welcome ‘self-engendered activity’ in machines, but they should also learn what this activity implies in regard to inner experience which in all the Mysteries was beyond the reach of Ego-consciousness until the time of the Christ Event. Through self-engendered activity, man himself is now able by degrees to become a creator. And this is what the men of to-day will learn to under-stand if they fill themselves with the Christ Impulse.

Keeping this in mind we shall realise that another question put by Christ Jesus to the disciples was of very special importance. He had first asked: Who among the leaders of a former generation could be called a ‘Son of Man’?—and the disciples had spoken of certain individuals. He then put a further question, wishing to bring them gradually to the point of understanding His own nature, of understanding what He represented in regard to Egohood. This is implicit in the other question: ‘But whom say ye that I am?’ (Matt. XVI, 15). (Special importance must in every instance be attached to the words ‘I am’ in the Gospel of St. Matthew.) The answer given by Peter showed that he now recognized Christ not only as a ‘Son of Man’ but as the ‘Son of the living God’—and this translation can well be retained.

What is the difference between ‘Son of the living God’ and ‘Son of Man’? To understand this, certain facts already known to us must be elaborated.

As man evolves, the spiritual or consciousness-soul develops in him; in the consciousness-soul the Spirit-Self can become manifest. But when the consciousness-soul has developed in a man, Spirit-Self, Life-Spirit and Spirit-Man must as it were come towards him, in order that this opening flower of his being may receive the higher triad. This ascent of man can also be likened to the development and growth of a plant.

Man's being comes to flower in the spiritual or consciousness-soul and Spirit-Self or Manas, Life-Spirit or Budhi, and Spirit-Man or Atma, stream towards him. This may be likened to a process of spiritual fertilization from above. Whereas man grows upwards from below with the other members of his being, unfolding the flower that is the ‘Son of Man’, if he is to progress even further and acquire full Ego-consciousness there must come to him from above the gift of Spirit-Self, Life-Spirit and Spirit-Man. And who is the representative of this gift from above, pointing to what man's nature will be in a far, far distant future? The first gift received is the Spirit-Self. He who receives the Spirit-Self coming from above—of whom is he the representative? He is the representative, the Son, of the God who lives, the Son of the Life-Spirit, the Son of the living God!

And now Christ Jesus asks: What is it that must come to men through my impulse?—It is the life-giving, Spirit-principle from above! Thus a distinction must be made between the Son of Man who has grown upwards from below the Son of God, the Son of the living God, who comes down from above. But the difficulty of this question for the disciples will be apparent to you when you realise that they were the very first to receive what the simplest of men since the time of Christ Jesus have received through the Gospels. It was only the living forces of Christ Jesus that enabled the disciples to assimilate all this teaching. The faculties they had already developed were not capable of answering the question: Of whom am I myself the representative? The Gospel then records that one of the disciples, Peter by name, gave the answer: ‘Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God!’ At the moment of its utterance, this was an answer that did not issue from Peter's normal spiritual faculties.

Let us try to picture the scene vividly.—As He gazed at Peter, Christ Jesus realised the great significance of the fact that there should have come from this mouth an answer pointing to an immeasurably distant future. And then, perceiving the actual range of Peter's consciousness and of powers sufficiently developed to enable him to give such an answer through his intellect or through faculties acquired at stages leading to Initiation, Christ Jesus was bound to affirm: This answer does not spring from Peter's conscious knowledge; it is those deeper powers, only gradually transformed by man into conscious powers, that arc speaking here.

Through transforming the forces of our astral, etheric and physical bodies we rise to Spirit-Self, Life-Spirit and Spirit-Man. This is an elementary teaching of Spiritual Science. The forces We shall eventually unfold in the astral body as Spirit-Self are already within the astral body, but they are there by the grace of divine-spiritual Powers; their development is not due to our own efforts and activity. So too there is divine Life-Spirit within our etheric body. Hence Christ says to Peter: It is not what is in your consciousness at this moment that spoke from your mouth, but something you will develop only in the future, something that is indeed within you but of which as yet you know nothing. What is part of your flesh and blood is not yet capable of uttering the words: ‘Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ Divine-spiritual powers lying deeply below the threshold of consciousness—indeed the very deepest powers in human nature—were speaking out of you at that moment.—It was the mysterious higher Powers in Peter—called by Christ the ‘Father in Heaven’—the Powers out of which Peter had indeed been born but of which he was not yet conscious, that spoke out of him. Hence the saying: ‘This has been revealed to you by the Father in Heaven, not by what you are at present as a man of flesh and blood.’

In these circumstances Christ was bound to say to Himself: ‘In Peter I have a disciple whose whole constitution is such that the Father-power within him has not yet been touched by forces already engendered by consciousness, by the operations of spiritual activity; this subconscious power is so strong in Peter that it can be his sure foundation when he surrenders himself to it. This is the important quality in him. It is also present in every human being, but will be raised into the conscious state only in the future. If what I have to impart to mankind, if that for which I am the impulse, is to unfold and lay hold of men, it must be founded upon the utterance made through the mouth of Peter: ‘Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God!’ Upon this rock in human nature, unharmed as yet by the surging waves of consciousness, upon the Father-power voicing itself in those words, I will build what must spring with ever-increasing strength from my impulse.’—

When this foundation is established, the humanity embodying the Christ Impulse will arise.—This is implicit in the words: ‘Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build that which can create a community of men faithful to the Christ Impulse!’

Glib discussions and debates about these words in St. Matthew's Gospel take place to-day, for nearly all over the world they are the subject of controversy. They must indeed not be taken lightly. They can be understood only when their meaning is drawn from the depths of the wisdom that is the wisdom of the Mysteries.

And now something else is indicated, namely that Christ Jesus does indeed build upon the deeper, subconscious power in Peter. Immediately afterwards He begins to speak of what is about to befall, and of the Mystery of Golgotha. The moment has already passed when the deeper nature in Peter was speaking; he now gives utterance to what has already become conscious in him. Now he cannot understand what Christ means, cannot believe that suffering and death are to ensue. And when the Peter who has developed his own conscious faculties is speaking, Christ must reprove him, saying: This is not uttered by a Divinity within you but by faculties you have developed in yourself as a human being; what these faculties have here produced is worthless, for its source is delusion; it comes from Ahriman, from Satan!—This is implied in the words: ‘Get thee behind me, Satan. Thou art an offence unto me; for thou savourest not the things that be of God but those that be of men.’ (Matt. XVI, 23). Christ uses the word ‘Satan’ for Ahriman, whereas elsewhere in the Bible the word ‘Devil’ applies to everything of a Luciferic nature. Christ uses the right word for the delusion to which Peter succumbs.

Such is the truth. But what does modern Bible exegesis make of these episodes? It has realised that Christ Jesus cannot have said to Peter at one minute: ‘You alone have recognized that a God is standing before you!’ and have called him ‘Satan’ the next. So some critics conclude that the word ‘Satan’ must have been interpolated at a later time and is therefore a falsification.—The fact of the matter is that the meaning attributed to this by modern philological research makes current opinion on the subject quite worthless. Only on the basis of a fundamental understanding of the Bible is it possible for any authentic statement to be made about the origins of the texts in question.

But between the two sayings I have quoted there is another, intelligible only in the light of an ancient, yet ever, new Mystery-teaching: that man as he is on Earth—not only the individual but every community of men—is a mirror-image of processes in the Macrocosm. Mention was made of this when we were speaking of the genealogy of Jesus of Nazareth. It was explained that the meaning of the words spoken to Abraham was: ‘Thy descendants shall be an image of the order of the stars in heaven.’ The order of the twelve constellations and of the movement of the planets through the Zodiac was to be repeated in the twelve tribes and in the history of the Hebrew people through three times fourteen generations. Thus in the sequence of the generations and the special heredity resulting from the blood-ties in the twelve tribes, there was to be an image of macrocosmic conditions. Such was the declaration made to Abraham.

At the moment when Peter, whose deeper nature had been able to understand that the Christ Impulse signified the down-flow of spiritual power through the Son of the living God—at that moment Christ knows that He can speak to those around Him of the beginning of something new arising on the Earth. Whereas it had been declared to Abraham that the image of cosmic conditions was to be formed by blood-kinship, this image was now to be replaced by one formed by relationships of an ethical, moral and spiritual character, giving expression to what man can attain through his Ego. When men understand, as the deeper nature in Peter understood, what the Christ truly is, they will not establish communities and institutions based entirely on the blood-tie but communities where the bond of love is woven from soul to soul. Just as in the blood of the Hebrew people and in the threads running through the generations, that which was ordained to be bound together in the human race was bound together and that which was ordained to be loosed was loosed according to the pattern of the Macrocosm, so there was now to arise through the conscious Ego, in the form of ethical, moral and spiritual relationships, the force that either looses the ties between human beings or binds them together in love. Human institutions were now to be created or harmonized by the conscious Ego. This is the meaning of the words spoken by Christ Jesus in continuation of the answer He had given to Peter: ‘Whatever you bind on Earth—whatever thc deeper nature in you binds—that shall be bound in Heaven, and whatever the same deeper nature in you looses on the Earth below, shall also be loosed in Heaven’ (see Matt. XVI, 19).

In ancient times the all-important factor in associations among human beings was blood-relationship. But men must now grow to the stage where the ties of real significance are of a spiritual, moral and ethical character. From this it follows that a community must mean something for an individual who has been a contributory factor in the founding of it. In the sense of Anthroposophy, we can say: the karma of the individual must be merged with the karma of communities. This will be known to you from what has been said in recent years. The idea of karma is not repudiated when I give something to one who is needy, nor when the karma. of an individual is shouldered for him by the community. The community can help to bear the fate of the individual. In other words, the following may happen in the moral sphere. A single member of a community commits a wrong. This will quite certainly be inscribed in his personal karma and be worked out in the great setting of world-existence. But someone else may come forward and say: ‘I will help you to work out this karma!’—The karma must be fulfilled, but the other person can help; whole communities can help the one who has committed a wrong. The karma of an individual may be so interwoven with the community that the community, regarding him as a member, deliberately shoulders§ the burden of his destiny, feeling for him and resolving that his lot shall be ameliorated. The attitude of the community may be: You, as an individual, have done wrong, but we will enter the lists for you; we take upon ourselves whatever will bring about the adjustment of your karma!—If ‘church’ is substituted for ‘community’, this means that the church assumes the obligation to take upon itself the sins of the individual, to share the burden of his karma. It is not a matter of what is to-day called ‘forgiveness of sins’, but of a real bond, an acceptance of the burden of sins. And the essential point is that the community consciously accepts this burden.

If the ‘binding’ and ‘loosing’ are understood in thiS sense, every case of forgiveness of Sins would entail an obligation on the part of the community. Thus a web is spun by the threads of individual karma being woven into the karma of the whole community. And this web, through what Christ brought down from the heights of the Spirit, is to be an image of the order prevailing in Heaven; that is to say, the karma of the individual is not to be bound with the collective karma in any fortuitous way but so that the community as an organism shall become an image of the order prevailing in Heaven.

This scene of Peter's avowal now begins to reveal an infinitely profound meaning to those who have a dawning understanding of it. It denotes the founding of thc humanity of the future—a humanity based upon the Ego-nature in man. What takes place in this intimate conversation between Christ and those who were closest to Him is that Christ transmits the power He Himself has brought from the Macrocosm to what the disciples are to establish. And from this point onwards the Gospel of St. Matthew recounts how the disciples are led upwards, step by step, to the stage where the powers of the Sun and of the Cosmos gathered together in the Christ Being can flow into them. We know that one form of Initiation is an expansion into the Macrocosm. And because Christ Himself is the impulse in this Initiation, He leads His disciples out into the Cosmos. While an individual aspirant is undergoing the process of this Initiation he passes consciously into the Macrocosm, gathering knowledge of it by degrees. Christ descends as it were from the Macrocosm, makes manifest its instreaming forces and conveys them to thc disciples.

In one part of the lecture yesterday I indicated how this takes place. Let us picture the scene as graphically as possible. While a man is asleep his physical and etheric bodies lie in the bed while his astral body and Ego pass out into the Cosmos and the forces of the Cosmos pour into these members of his being. If Christ were now to approach, He would be the One who consciously draws these forces to the sleeping man and illumines him. This is exactly what happens in a scene described in the Gospel. The disciples are in a ship in the fourth watch of the night. Then they see that the figure they had at first taken to be a spirit, is Christ, who enables the forces and power of thc Macrocosm to flow into them. How He leads the disciples to the stage where they can receive the forces of the Macrocosm is clearly portrayed.

The next scenes in St. Matthew's Gospel show how Christ leads the disciples step by step along the path taken by every would-be Initiate. It is as if Christ Himself is treading this path, leading His disciples by the hand to Initiation.—I will now say something that will enable you to realise how the disciples are led stage by stage into the Macrocosm.

Many things previously beyond man's ken become known to him through visions of the spiritual world, through clairvoyant faculties. Thus, for example, he is able to recognize the actual processes operating in the growth of plants. A materialist will say of a plant: Here I have a flower—let us say it is a fruit-bearing plant—and a seed will form in it. The seed can be extracted and laid in the soil; the grain eventually dissolves and a new plant, again bearing seed, appears. And so the process continues. Something passes over from the dissolving grain of seed into the new plant.—A materialist cannot possibly think otherwise than that something material, however minute, passes over. But it is not so. The truth is that in respect of its material, its substance, the old plant is entirely destroyed. A jump (Sprung) takes place and the new plant is an entirely new formation—in respect of material substance an absolutely new formation.

Facts of the very greatest importance are recognized and understood when this remarkable law is grasped. Jumps do actually occur in material conditions. This was expressed in the Mysteries in a very definite way. It was said: In passing into the Cosmos the aspirant for Initiation must at a certain stage acquire knowledge of the forces that bring about these ‘jumps’. Now certain processes in the Cosmos can be understood if the constellations are used as means of indication. The constellations are then like letters of a script. When we pass into the Cosmos in a particular direction we come to know the jumps that occur from forefather to successor—whether it be in the plant, animal or human kingdoms, or even in the realm of planetary existence. At the transitions of Saturn-evolution to Sun-evolution, of Sun-evolution to Moon-evolution, of Moon-evolution to Earth-evolution, everything material passed away. The spiritual remained and it was the spiritual that brought about the jumps. In small things and in great it is the same.

Two symbols have been used for this principle, one ancient and of a more pictorial, imaginative character, and another rather newer. You can find the newer symbol in calendars. As evolution advances, the past curls inwards like a vortex and the new phase emerges as a second vortex, unfolding from within outwards and leading on further. But the new phase is not actually joined to the old; between the end of the old phase and the beginning of the new there is a little ‘jump’ or ‘gap’ and only then does the process of evolution continue.

In the above figure we have two intertwining vortices and between them a little gap. This is the zodiacal sign of Cancer, symbolizing the process of growing out into the Macrocosm and the birth of a new shoot in some phase of evolution.

This principle was also represented by another symbol. Strange as it may seem to you, the symbol was an ass and its foal, the forefather and his offspring. This was meant to represent the actual transition from one condition to the other. Ancient delineations of the constellation of Cancer often consist of the figure of an ass and its foal. To know this is by no means without importance. It helps us to understand that another significant transition takes place when a man is rising to the stage leading into the spiritual world but must then be prepared for entirely new revelations. The stellar symbol correctly indicates this by portraying how when the physical sun passes through the constellation of Cancer and reaches the zenith, it descends again. And when the aspirant for Initiation first makes the ascent into the spiritual world and has acquired knowledge of its forces, he brings them down again in order to turn them to the service of humanity.

The Gospel of St. Matthew and the other Gospels too, tell how Christ Jesus presents this truth to the disciples. The way in which the story is told indicates that He is not using words alone but is presenting to them the Imagination, the living picture, of what He Himself is accomplishing as He approaches the height to which evolving humanity must in time ascend. He uses the image of the ass and its foal; that is to say, He guides the disciples towards an understanding of what corresponds in the spiritual life to the constellation of Cancer. This is a picture of something that has come to pass in the living, spiritual relationship between Christ and His disciples. So great is its majesty and its splendour that it cannot be expressed in the words of any human language but only through Christ Himself initiating the disciples into the conditions prevailing in the spiritual world and creating in physical conditions images of the Macrocosm He leads them to the point where the powers of one who is initiated become, in turn, of service to mankind. He is standing at the height that can only be indicated by the image of the Sun at the zenith of the sign of Cancer! No wonder that this chapter (XXI) of the Gospel of St. Matthew points to the supreme height now reached in Christ's earthly life, triumphantly proclaimed by the words: ‘Hosanna in the highest!’ Everything is ordained to the end that through what has here come to pass the disciples may grow to the stage where through the powers working in them there may unfold in men what Christ Jesus has brought into the evolution of humanity.

The story of the feast of the Passover is nothing else than an account of the living influx of the power that was to stream into the disciples, first as teaching and then into humanity as if by magic, as an outcome of the Mystery of Golgotha. It is in this light that the continuation of the story, in the Gospel of St. Matthew is to be understood. Then we shall also realise that the writer of the Gospel was perpetually conscious of the need to point to the contrast between the living teaching brought from cosmic heights and imparted to the disciples, and the teaching suitable for those who were not yet ready to receive the forces of Christ Jesus Himself. Hence the utterances in the conversations with the Scribes and Pharisees which we shall be studying tomorrow. To-day, however, we will remind ourselves that after Christ Jesus has guided His disciples as far as possible along the path leading to the goal of all aspirants for Initiation, He holds out thc prospect that if they tread this path they themselves will pass into the spiritual world, into the Macrocosm. He tells them that they have within them the qualities necessary for subsequent Initiation, that Initiation is in store for them and that they will find the way into that world where they will recognize Christ more and more clearly as the Being who fills all spiritual space and was imaged in Jesus of Nazareth. Christ says to His disciples that they are approaching this Initiation, that they will become Initiates of humanity. He reminds them too that individual Initiation can be attained only if by dint of patience and endurance the inner nature is allowed to mature.

What is it that must grow in man's inner nature as its forces increase in strength and he develops a higher form of clairvoyance? His qualities must mature to the stage where he can receive into himself the forces of Spirit-Self, Life-Spirit and Spirit-Man. But when the power that makes him an Initiate, a participant in the Kingdoms of Heaven, will stream into him from above, depends upon the moment when he can become fully mature; it depends upon the karma of the individual. Who knows when the moment has come? It is known only to the very highest initiates, not to those at lower stages of Initiation. For any individuality who is ready to reach the spiritual world, the hour comes when he does so. Assuredly the hour comes, but in such a way that he is not aware of it—it comes like a thief in the night !

How does a man reach the spiritual world? In the ancient Mysteries—and in a certain respect it is so in the new—there were three stages of Initiation into the Macrocosm. When the first stage had been attained by the aspirant, the powers of the Spirit-Self became active in him and now he was not only a new man but had become one whose nature was said to be that of an ‘Angel—that is to say, a Being of the Hierarchy immediately above man. In the Mysteries of ancient Persia, a man possessing the powers of the Spirit-Self was called a ‘Persian’ because he was no longer a separate individual but belonged to the Angel of the Persian people. At the next stage of Initiation the Life-Spirit awakens. A man who had reached this stage was called a ‘Sun Hero’ in the Persian Mysteries, because he had developed to thc stage where he could receive the spiritual forces of the Sun streaming towards the Earth. But such a man was also called a ‘Son of the Father’. And one with whom Atma, or Spirit-Man, had made contact was called ‘Father’ in the ancient Mysteries. The three stages of Initiation were: Angel, Son or Sun Hero, Father.

Only the very highest Initiates, they and they alone are able to judge when the moment of Initiation can be reached. Hence Christ speaks to the following effect.—Initiation will be attained if you go forward on the paths along which I have led you. You will rise into the Kingdoms of Heaven, but the hour is known neither to the Angels in whom the Spirit-Self is working, neither to the Son in whom the Life-Spirit has awakened, but only to the very highest Initiates, those in whom the Father-principle is active.

Here again the words of St. Matthew's Gospel (XXIV, 36) are in absolute conformity with the tradition originating in the Mysteries. And we shall find that the proclamation of the Kingdom of Heaven is nothing else than the prediction to the disciples that they will experience initiation. Christ Jesus indicates this very clearly in the text of the Gospel of St. Matthew. If the relevant passage is correctly interpreted it is quite evident that Christ is referring to certain teachings in circulation at that time on the subject of reaching the Kingdoms of Heaven. Men had taken this in the material sense, believing that it applied to the whole Earth, whereas they ought to have known that the Kingdoms of Heaven are reached by a few individuals only, through their Initiation. In other words, the opinion was held by some that the Earth would be transformed in a material sense into Heaven. And Christ draws special attention to this by speaking of the coming of those who would proclaim it. He calls them false prophets and false Messiahs! How strange it is that even to-day a few so-called Gospel critics spread the fable that the prospect of an approaching material Kingdom of God was a teaching given by Christ Jesus Himself ! Anyone able to read the Gospel of St. Matthew correctly knows that Christ Jesus was referring to a spiritual happening within the eventual reach of one who is approaching Initiation, but in the course of Earth-evolution becoming accessible to all those members of humanity who cleave to Him and in attaining higher stages of development bring about the spiritualisation of the Earth itself.

This aspect too must give us deeper insight into the structure of St. Matthew's Gospel. We shall then feel profound reverence for a Gospel from which, as from no other, we can learn unmistakably how the disciples of Christ Jesus were the first to receive teaching that was directed to the Ego itself. We picture Christ's disciples standing around Him and perceive how the forces of the Cosmos are working through the human body He bore. We picture Him guiding His disciples in a way that enables them to acquire the knowledge accessible to all who are approaching Initiation. We hear of human situations formed around Him. This is what makes St. Matthew's Gospel seem so near to us in a human sense. Through this Gospel we learn to know the man Jesus of Nazareth, the bearer of the Christ; we learn to know what Christ accomplished through His descent into the nature of Man. Even happenings in the heavenly worlds are presented in terms of human situations and relationships in the Gospel of St. Matthew.

In the final lecture tomorrow these things will be considered not only from the aspect of Initiation but from other aspects as well.

Elfter Vortrag

Auf die Versuchungsgeschichte, die wir darstellen konnten als Impuls für eine besondere Art der Einweihung, folgte das, was der Christus Jesus zunächst seinen Jüngern als Verbreiter der alten Lehren in einer vollständig neuen Form werden konnte, sodann, was er werden konnte nicht nur als Verbreiter von Lehren, sondern, wenn der Ausdruck gebraucht werden darf, als Kraft, als gesundende Kraft der Menschen. Das ist dargestellt in den Heilungen. Dann haben wir gestern jenen Übergang gemacht, der, wie ich sagte, einigen guten Willen zum Verständnis voraussetzt, guten Willen, der sich ergibt aus einer Verarbeitung der geisteswissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse, wie man sie im Laufe von Jahren in sich aufgenommen haben kann. Wir haben den Übergang gemacht zu jener eigentümlichen Art von lebendiger Belehrung durch Übergabe von Kräften, die ausgingen von dem Christus Jesus und sozusagen in die Seelen seiner Jünger einstrahlten. Und wir haben versucht, so gut es ging, ein gewaltiges Mysterium mit Menschenworten auszudrücken. Wir haben versucht, darauf aufmerksam zu machen, wie diese Lehre war, die der Christus Jesus seinen Jüngern zu geben hatte. Er war eine Art Sammelpunkt, ein Sammelwesen für Kräfte, die aus dem Makrokosmos in die Verhältnisse der Erde einflossen und zu den Seelen der Jünger hinströmen sollten, und die nur durch jene Kräfte gesammelt werden konnten, die in der Wesenheit des Christus Jesus vereinigt waren. Die Kräfte, welche sonst den Menschen nur unbewußt während des Schlafzustandes zuströmen, sie strömten aus Weltenweiten durch die Wesenheit des Christus Jesus den Jüngern zu als die belehrenden und belebenden Kräfte des Kosmos selber. In den Einzelheiten kann man natürlich diese Kräfte, welche aufklärende Kräfte über das Weltendasein sind, nur charakterisieren, wenn man sich einläßt auf die verschiedenen Konstellationen im Kosmos. Und auf dieses Mysterium werden wir heute noch, insofern es das Matthäus-Evangelium darstellt, hinzuweisen haben. Vorerst aber haben wir uns klarzumachen, wie die Jünger zunehmen mußten an Weisheit gegenüber den Verhältnissen der Erde dadurch, daß die Kräfte des Christus Jesus auf sie hinüberstrahlten. Sie mußten sozusagen in sich selber, in ihrem Leben, in ihrer lebendigen Weisheit wachsen, wachsen in der verschiedensten Weise.

Nun wird uns gerade eine eigentümliche Art in dem Wachstum eines der Jünger oder Apostel dargestellt. Aber wir werden dieses einzelne, besonders Bedeutsame in dem Leben eines Apostels nur verstehen, wenn wir es aus einem großen Zusammenhange herausholen. Da müssen wir uns klarmachen, daß der Mensch ja in der Menschheitsevolution fortschreitet. Wir machen nicht umsonst Inkarnation nach Inkarnation durch. So haben wir in der nachatlantischen Zeit nicht umsonst Inkarnationen durchgemacht innerhalb der ersten nachatlantischen Kulturperiode, der indischen, dann in der persischen Kulturperiode, in der ägyptisch-chaldäischen, in der griechisch-lateinischen und so weiter, sondern diese Inkarnationen machen wir durch als die große Lebensschule, damit wir in jeder dieser Inkarnationen aus den Verhältnissen, die in diesen Kulturperioden vorhanden sind, etwas aus der Umgebung aufnehmen. Dadurch wachsen wir allmählich. Und worin besteht dieses Wachstum des Menschen durch die einzelnen Epochen der Menschheitsevolution hindurch?

Der Mensch hat ja, wie wir aus den elementarischen Anschauungen der Anthroposophie wissen, verschiedene Glieder seiner Wesenheit. Wenn wir sie in unserem Sinne aufzählen wollen, haben wir physischen Leib, Ätherleib, Astralleib, mit dem Astralleib verknüpft die Empfindungsseele, dann die Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele, die Bewußtseinsseele. Dann haben wir an höheren Gliedern der menschlichen Natur, zu denen wir uns hinaufentwickeln: Geistselbst, Lebensgeist und den Geistesmenschen. Nun wurde uns in der Tat in jeder der nachatlantischen Kulturepochen etwas gegeben für diese einzelnen Glieder unserer Menschennatur. So wurde in der ersten Epoche, in der altindischen Kultur, dem Menschen etwas an Kräften eingefügt, wodurch er in seinem Ätherleibe mehr wurde, als er früher war. Was ihm in dieser Beziehung eingeprägt werden sollte in seinen physischen Leib, das wurde ihm schon in den letzten Zeiten der atlantischen Periode eingefügt. Mit dem Ätherleibe dagegen beginnen jene Gaben, die dem Menschen während der nachatlantischen Zeit zukommen sollten. So wurden ihm in der altindischen Zeit die Kräfte gegeben, die seinem Ätherleibe eingepflanzt werden sollten; dann in der urpersischen Zeit die Kräfte, die seinem astralischen Leibe, dem Empfindungsleibe, eingepflanzt werden sollten; während der ägyptisch-chaldäischen Zeit die Kräfte für die Empfindungsseele. Während der vierten Kulturperiode, der griechisch-lateinischen Zeit, wurden ihm eingeprägt die Kräfte der Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele; und jetzt leben wir in dem Zeitalter, wo die entsprechenden Kräfte, die in diese Linie gehören, nach und nach der Bewußtseinsseele eingeprägt werden sollen. In diesem Einprägen ist die Menschheit noch nicht sehr weit vorgeschritten. Dann wird ein sechster nachatlantischer Zeitraum kommen, wo in die Menschennatur eingeprägt werden die Kräfte des Geistselbst und im siebenten Kulturzustande die Kräfte des Lebensgeistes. Und dann blikken wir auf ferne Zukünfte hin, wo uns der Geistesmensch oder Atma in dem normalen Menschentum eingeprägt werden soll.

Nun betrachten wir diese menschliche Entwickelung in bezug auf den einzelnen Menschen. Wie wir jetzt den Menschen betrachten müssen, so betrachten ihn stets die, welche von den wahren Verhältnissen dieser Dinge aus den heiligen Mysterien heraus etwas wußten. So mußten ihn auch nach und nach betrachten lernen die Jünger durch die belebende, belehrende Kraft, die ausströmte von dem Christus Jesus und auf sie überging. Wir können daher sagen: Wenn wir den Menschen betrachten - jetzt oder auch zur Zeit des Christus Jesus -, so liegen in ihm Anlagen, wie zum Beispiel in einer Pflanze Anlagen liegen, die auch schon dann vorhanden sind, wenn die Pflanze nur die grünen Blätter und noch nicht Blüte und Frucht hat. Eine solche Pflanze, die nur grüne Blätter hat, schauen wir an und wissen: So wahr die Pflanze da ist, hat sie schon in sich die Anlage zur Blüte und zur Frucht, die sie entwickeln wird, wenn alles regelmäßig geht. So wahr aus der Pflanze, auch wenn sie erst die grünen Blätter hat, herauswachsen Blüte und Frucht, so gewiß ist es, daß aus dem Menschen, der, wie es zur Zeit des Christus Jesus der Fall war, nur Empfindungsseele und Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele hat, die Bewußtseinsseele herauswächst, die sich dann öffnet dem Geistselbst, damit die oberste Dreiheit als Neues wie eine göttlich-geistige Gabe dem Menschen zufließen kann. Deshalb können wir sagen: Der Mensch entfaltet sich aus dem, was seine Seeleninhalte, was seine Seeleneigenschaften sind. So, wie sich die Pflanze, die nur grüne Blätter hat, zu Blüte und Frucht entfaltet, so entfaltet sich der Mensch in der Weise, daß er aus Empfindungsseele, Verstandesseele und Bewußtseinsseele etwas wie eine Blüte seines Wesens dem entgegenhält, was ihm als ein Göttliches von oben herunterkommt, damit er durch den Empfang des Geistselbst einen weiteren Weg in die Höhen der Menschheitsentwickelung durchmachen kann.

In dieser Weise konnten die Menschen, die zur Zeit des Christus Jesus bloß das Äußere ganz normal entwickelt hatten, sagen: Ja, jetzt ist erst normalerweise die Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele entwickelt, die noch nicht ein Geistselbst in sich aufnehmen kann, aber es wird sich aus demselben Menschen, der jetzt die Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele als Höchstes entwickelt hat, herausentwickeln als sein Kind, als sein Ergebnis, die Bewußtseinsseele, die sich dann öffnen kann dem Geistselbst.

Und was der Mensch nach seiner ganzen Wesenheit sozusagen als seine Blüte entfalten mußte, was da aus ihm herauswuchs, was sich ergab aus seiner Natur, wie nannte man das in den Mysterien? Wie mußte man es daher auch in der Umgebung des Christus Jesus nennen, wenn die Jünger wirklich vorwärtskommen wollten? Man nannte es - wenn wir es in unsere Sprache übersetzen wollen - mit dem Ausdruck «Sohn des Menschen»; denn das griechische Wort υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου hat durchaus nicht die eingeschränkte Bedeutung unseres «Sohn» als «Sohn eines Vaters», sondern dessen, was sich ergibt als Nachkomme einer Wesenheit, was herauswächst aus einer Wesenheit wie die Blüte aus einer bisher nur blättertragenden Pflanze. Daher konnte man, als die normalen Menschen noch nicht in der Bewußtseinsseele jene Blüte ihrer Wesenheit entwickelt hatten, noch nichts von dem υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου in sich hatten, sagen: Ja, die normalen Menschen haben noch nichts von dem «Sohn des Menschen» entwickelt, aber es muß ja immer Menschen geben, die ihrem Geschlechte voranschreiten, die schon in einer früheren Zeit das Wissen und das Leben einer späteren Epoche in sich haben. Unter den Führern der Menschheit muß es solche geben, die im vierten Zeitraum, wo normalerweise nur die Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele entwickelt ist, trotzdem sie äußerlich ausschauen wie die anderen Menschen, doch innerlich schon die Möglichkeit der Bewußtseinsseele entwickelt haben, in die hineinleuchtet das Geistselbst. - Und solche «Menschensöhne» gab es. Und die Jünger des Christus Jesus sollten daher heranwachsen zum Verstehen, welches die Natur und Wesenheit dieser Führer der Menschheit ist.

Da fragte der Christus Jesus, um sich zu überzeugen, wie sie darüber denken, zunächst seine intimen Schüler, seine Jünger: Sagt mir etwas davon, von welchen Wesen, von welchen Menschen man sagen kann, daß sie Menschensöhne sind diesem Geschlecht? - So etwa müßte man die Frage stellen, wenn man sie im Sinne der aramäischen Urschrift des Matthäus-Evangeliums stellen wollte; denn ich habe schon darauf aufmerksam gemacht, daß in der griechischen Übertragung, wenn man sie gut versteht, zwar noch alles besser ist, als es heute ausgelegt wird, daß aber trotzdem notwendigerweise manches bei der Übertragung aus der aramäischen Urschrift undeutlich geworden ist. Also müssen wir uns den Christus Jesus vor seinen Jüngern stehend denken und sie fragend: Was herrscht als Anschauung darüber, wer von jenen Menschen des vorangegangenen Geschlechts, die schon in den griechisch-lateinischen Zeitraum hineingehörten, Menschensöhne wären? Da zählten sie ihm auf: Elias, Johannes der Täufer, Jeremias und sonstige Propheten. Das wußten die Jünger durch die belehrende Kraft, die ihnen durch den Christus geworden war, daß jene Führer Kräfte in sich aufgenommen hatten, durch die sie hinaufgewachsen waren bis zum Insichtragen des Menschensohnes. Bei derselben Gelegenheit gab einer der Jünger, der Petrus gewöhnlich genannt wird, noch eine andere Antwort (Matth. 16,13-16).

Um diese andere Antwort zu verstehen, müssen wir uns ganz fest in die Seele geschrieben sein lassen, was wir gerade in den verflossenen Tagen als die Mission des Christus Jesus im Sinne des Matthäus-Evangeliums gezeigt haben: daß durch den Christus-Impuls für die Menschen die Möglichkeit gegeben war, das volle Ich-Bewußtsein auszubilden, das, was in dem «Ich bin» liegt, zur höchsten Blüte zu bringen. Mit anderen Worten: Auch in der Initiation sollten die Menschen gegen die Zukunft hin so in die höheren Welten hineinwachsen, daß das Ich-Bewußtsein, das wir als normale Menschen heute nur für die physische Welt haben, voll erhalten bleibt bei allen Wegen in die höheren Welten hinauf. Daß dies sein kann, wurde ermöglicht durch das Dasein des Christus Jesus in der physischen Welt. So dürfen wir sagen: Es ist der Christus Jesus der Repräsentant derjenigen Kraft, welche der Menschheit das volle Bewußtsein des «Ich bin» gegeben hat.

Ich habe schon besonders darauf hingewiesen, wie die Evangelieninterpretationen der freisinnigen oder gar evangeliengegnerischen Richtungen gerade das Wichtige gewöhnlich nicht betonen. Sie weisen immer darauf hin, daß einzelne Wortfolgen der Evangelien und so weiter schon früher irgendwo vorgekommen sind. So zum Beispiel könnten sie darauf hinweisen, daß selbst der Inhalt der Seligpreisungen schon früher da war. Aber, was nicht da war - darauf müssen wir immer wieder hinweisen -, was früher nicht unter Aufrechterhaltung des Ich-Bewußtseins der Menschen erreicht werden konnte, das wird durch den Christus-Impuls für die menschliche Eigenheit erreicht werden können! Das ist außerordentlich bedeutsam. Ich habe die einzelnen Glieder der Seligpreisungen auseinandergelegt und habe gezeigt, daß es im ersten Satze heißen muß: «Selig sind die Bettler um Geist», weil nach der Menschheitsevolution derjenige Mensch arm an Geist ist, der nicht mehr hineinschauen kann in die geistige Welt im Sinne des alten Hellsehens. Aber den Trost und die Aufklärung gibt ihnen der Christus: Wenn sie auch nicht mehr durch die alten Hellseherorgane hineinschauen können in die geistige Welt, so werden sie jetzt durch sich selbst, durch ihr Ich hineinschauen können, denn: «Durch sich selber werden sie finden die Reiche der Himmel!» (Matth. 5,3). Ebenso der zweite Satz: «Selig sind, die da Leid tragen» (Matth. 5,4). Sie brauchen nicht mehr hineinzuwachsen durch das alte Hellseher vermögen in die Sphären der geistigen Welt; sie werden ihr Ich so entwickeln, daß sie hinaufwachsen können in die geistige Welt. Aber dazu muß das Ich immer mehr und mehr die Kraft aufnehmen, die in dem Christus als in einer einzigartigen Wesenheit einmal auf der Erde verankert war.

Es sollten die gegenwärtigen Menschen ein klein wenig gerade bei solchen Sachen wirklich überlegen: Nicht umsonst steht in diesen Seligkeiten der Bergpredigt überall in jedem einzelnen Satze ein griechisches Wort, das sehr wichtig ist: Ὅτι αὐτῶν ἐστιν ἡ βασιλεία τῶν οὐρανῶν. Wenn wir also den ersten Satz nehmen: «Selig sind die Bettler um Geist», so würde es dann weiter heißen: «In ihnen selbst» — oder «durch sich selbst werden sie haben die Reiche der Himmel.» Auf dieses «in ihnen selbst» wird immer hingedeutet; im zweiten Satz, im dritten Satz und so weiter, immer wird darauf hingewiesen. - Verzeihen Sie, wenn ich Sie jetzt auf etwas Großes in bezug auf unsere Zeit in einer sehr trivialen Weise hinweise. Unsere Zeit wird sich entschließen müssen, das Wort αὐτῶν «auton» — was in unserem «Automobil» liegt - nicht bloß auf Maschinen anzuwenden, nicht immer nur in der äußerlichsten Weise zu verstehen, sondern sie wird sich entschließen müssen, auch auf dem geistigen Gebiete die Eigenheit des ὅτι αὐτῶν, der Inbetriebsetzung zu verstehen. Das ist etwas, was unsere Zeit wohl als eine Mahnung aufnehmen darf: In bezug auf Maschinen liebt sie das Durch-Eigenheit-in-Betrieb-Setzen; aber in bezug auf das, was früher außerhalb des Ich-Bewußtseins war, und was in allen alten Mysterien bis zum Christus-Ereignis hin außerhalb des Ich-Bewußtseins erlebt wurde, sollte die Menschheit auch lernen das Durch-Eigenheit-in-Betrieb-Setzen, so daß der Mensch nach und nach der selbst-schöpferische Urheber von alledem werden kann. Und das wird gerade die heutige Menschheit verstehen lernen, wenn sie sich mit dem Christus-Impuls durchdringen wird.

Wenn wir dies ins Auge fassen, werden wir sagen: Es bedeutet die Frage, welche der Christus Jesus nach der anderen Seite an die Jünger stellte, noch etwas ganz Besonderes. Erst fragte er: Wer könnte von denen, welche die Führer waren dieses Geschlechtes, als ein Menschensohn bezeichnet werden? Und die Jünger wiesen hin auf einzelne der Führer. Dann fragte er noch etwas anderes. Er wollte es allmählich dahin bringen, daß sie seine eigene Natur verstehen, daß sie verstehen, was er repräsentiert für die Ichheit. Das liegt in der anderen Frage: «Und was denkt ihr, daß ich bin?» Und das «Ich bin» muß in jedem einzelnen Falle gerade in dem Matthäus-Evangelium besonders betont werden. Da gab Petrus eine Antwort, die dahin ging, daß er jetzt den Christus nicht bloß bezeichnete als Menschensohn, sondern daß er ihn bezeichnete - und wir können das Wort immer so übersetzen, wie es gebräuchlich ist — als den «Sohn des lebendigen Gottes». Was ist im Gegensatz zum «Menschensohn» der «Sohn des lebendigen Gottes»? Um diesen Begriff zu verstehen, müssen wir die Tatsachen ergänzen, die wir vorhin ausgesprochen haben.

Der Mensch, haben wir gesagt, entwickelt sich so hinauf, daß er in seiner Wesenheit die Bewußtseinsseele entfaltet, in der das Geistselbst erscheinen kann. Wenn er aber die Bewußtseinsseele entwickelt hat, müssen ihm Geistselbst, Lebensgeist und Geistesmensch gleichsam entgegensteigen, damit seine sich öffnende Blüte diese obere Dreiheit aufnehmen kann. Diese Hinaufentwickelung des Menschen können wir auch graphisch darstellen gleichsam wie eine Hinaufentwickelung von einer Art Pflanze:

Flowering of Man

In der Bewußtseinsseele öffnet sich der Mensch, und es kommt ihm entgegen das Geistselbst oder Manas, der Lebensgeist oder die Budhi und der Geistesmensch oder Atma. Das ist also etwas, was gleichsam dem Menschen als das Geistbefruchtende von oben entgegenkommt. Während der Mensch mit den anderen Gliedern von unten heraufwächst und sich öffnet zur Blüte des Menschensohnes, muß ihm, wenn er weiterschreitet und das vollständige Ich-Bewußtsein aufnehmen will, von oben entgegenkommen, was ihm entgegenbringt Geistselbst, Lebensgeist und Geistesmensch. Und der Repräsentant dessen, was ihm von oben heruntergebracht wird, was in die fernste Menschenzukunft hindeutet, wer ist das? Die erste Gabe empfangen wir als das Geistselbst. Wessen Repräsentant ist der, der die Gabe bringen wird des herunterkommenden Geistselbst ? Das ist der Sohn des Gottes, der lebt, der Lebensgeist, der «Sohn des lebendigen Gottes»!

Also es fragt der Christus Jesus in diesem Augenblick: Was muß durch meinen Impuls an den Menschen herankommen? Dasjenige, was das belebende Geistprinzip von oben ist, muß an den Menschen herankommen! So stehen sich gegenüber der «Menschensohn», der von unten nach oben wächst, und der Gottessohn, der «Sohn des lebendigen Gottes», der von oben nach unten wächst. Die müssen wir unterscheiden. Aber wir müssen es begreiflich finden, daß diese Frage für die Jünger eine schwierigere war. Diese Frage wird Ihnen in ihrer ganzen Schwierigkeit für die Jünger besonders dann vor die Seele treten, wenn Sie bedenken, daß die Jünger ja alles das erst empfingen, was die einfachsten Menschen nach der Zeit des Christus Jesus schon eingepflanzt erhalten haben durch die Evangelien. Die Jünger mußten es alles erst durch die lebendigen Lehrkräfte des Christus Jesus in sich aufnehmen. Es war in den Kräften, die sie bereits entwickelt hatten, keine Verständnisfähigkeit für das, was Antwort geben konnte auf die Frage: Wessen Repräsentant bin ich selber? Da wird darauf hingewiesen, daß einer der Jünger, der Petrus hieß, die Antwort gab: «Du bist der Christus, der Sohn des lebendigen Gottes» (Matth. 16,16). Das war in diesem Augenblicke eine Antwort, die, wenn wir so sagen dürfen, nicht aus den normalen Geisteskräften des Petrus heraus war. Und der Christus Jesus - versuchen wir die Sache dadurch lebendig darzustellen, daß wir etwa in gewissem Sinne an die Anschaulichkeit appellieren -, er mußte sich sagen, indem er den Petrus ansah: Es ist viel, daß aus diesem Munde diese Antwort gekommen ist, die sozusagen auf eine fernste Zukunftszeit hindeutet. - Und wenn er dann auf das blickte, was in dem Bewußtsein des Petrus war, was in ihm bereits so war, daß er mit dem Intellekt oder mit den Kräften, zu denen er es durch die Einweihung gebracht hatte, eine solche Antwort geben konnte, dann mußte der Christus sich sagen: Aus dem, was der Petrus bewußt weiß, ist es nicht heraus; da reden jene tieferen Kräfte, die im Menschen sind und die der Mensch erst nach und nach zu bewußten Kräften macht.

Wir tragen in uns physischen Leib, Ätherleib, Astralleib und Ich. Wir kommen hinauf zum Geistselbst, Lebensgeist und Geistesmenschen durch Umwandlung der Kräfte des astralischen Leibes, des Ätherleibes und des physischen Leibes. Das ist in der elementaren Geisteswissenschaft oft dargestellt worden. Aber die Kräfte, die wir einmal in unserem Astralleibe als Geistselbst entwickeln werden, sind in unserem Astralleibe schon darinnen; nur sind sie von göttlich-geistigen Mächten darinnen und nicht von uns entwickelt. Und ebenso ist in unserem Ätherleib schon ein göttlich-geistiger Lebensgeist darinnen. Daher sagt der Christus, indem er auf Petrus sieht: Was da gegenwärtig ist in deinem Bewußtsein, das hat nicht aus dir gesprochen; sondern es hat etwas gesprochen, was du erst in der Zukunft entwickeln wirst, was zwar in dir ist, aber wovon du noch nichts weißt. Was schon in deinem Fleisch und Blut ist, kann noch nicht so sprechen, daß das Wort zutage tritt: «Du bist Christus, der Sohn des lebendigen Gottes», sondern da reden die tief unter der Schwelle des Bewußtseins liegenden göttlich-geistigen Kräfte, die tiefsten sogar, die in dem Menschen drinnenstecken. - Das geheimnisvolle Höhere im Petrus, was der Christus den «Vater im Himmel» nennt, die Kräfte, aus denen Petrus zwar geboren ist, deren er sich aber noch nicht bewußt ist, die haben in diesem Augenblick aus ihm gesprochen. Daher das Wort: «Was du als Mensch aus Fleisch und Blut gegenwärtig bist, hat dir das nicht eingegeben, sondern der Vater in den Himmeln» (Matth. 16,17).

Dabei mußte aber der Christus noch etwas anderes sagen. Er mußte sich sagen: In dem Petrus habe ich eine Natur vor mir, einen Jünger, dessen ganze menschliche Konstitution so ist, daß durch die Kräfte, die schon das Bewußtsein entwickelt hat, daß durch die ganze Art und Weise, wie die Geistestätigkeit wirkt, nicht gestört wird die Vaterkraft in ihm; sie ist so stark, diese unterbewußte Menschenkraft, daß er auf sie bauen kann, wenn er sich dieser unterbewußten Menschenkraft überläßt. Das ist das Wichtige in ihm, konnte sich der Christus sagen. Was so in ihm ist, das ist aber auch in jedem Menschen. Nur bewußt ist es noch nicht weit genug, das wird sich erst in der Zukunft entwickeln. Soll sich das, was ich der Menschheit zu geben habe, und wofür ich der Impuls bin, weiter entwickeln und die Menschen ergreifen, so muß es sich auf das begründen, was da in dem Petrus eben gesprochen hat: «Du bist Christus, der Sohn des lebendigen Gottes!» Auf diesen Felsen im Menschen, den noch nicht zerstört haben die brandenden Wogen des schon entwickelten Bewußtseins, was da als die Vaterkraft spricht, darauf will ich das bauen, was immer mehr und mehr hervorsprießen soll aus meinem Impuls. - Und wenn die Menschen diese Grundlage entwickeln, wird sich das ergeben, was die Menschheit des ChristusImpulses sein wird. - Das liegt in den Worten: «Du bist der Petrus, und auf diesen Felsen will ich bauen, was eine Menschengemeinde ergeben kann, was eine Summe von Menschen ergeben kann, die sich zum Christus-Impuls bekennen!» (Matth. 16,18).

So leicht, wie die Diskussionen heute fließen - denn ein besonderer Streit herrscht fast in der ganzen Welt über diese Worte -, so leicht sind diese Worte, die im Matthäus-Evangelium stehen, wahrhaftig nicht zu nehmen. Sie sind nur zu verstehen, wenn man sie aus der Tiefe jener Weisheit, die zugleich die Mysterienweisheit ist, herausschöpft.

Und jetzt soll klar und deutlich noch etwas anderes gezeigt werden: daß nämlich wirklich auf die tiefere, unterbewußte Kraft in Petrus von dem Christus Jesus gebaut wird. Denn im nächsten Augenblick redet der Christus von den nächsten Ereignissen, die sich abspielen sollen. Von dem, was als das Mysterium auf Golgatha geschehen soll, beginnt er zu reden. Und jetzt ist der Augenblick schon vorbei, wo das tiefer in Petrus Liegende spricht; jetzt spricht das in Petrus, was in ihm schon bewußt ist. Jetzt kann er nicht verstehen, was der Christus damit meint, kann nicht glauben, daß Leiden und Sterben eintreten sollen. Und wo der bewußte Petrus spricht, der schon die bewußten eigenen Kräfte in sich entwickelt hat, da muß ihn der Christus zurechtweisen, indem er sagt: Jetzt redet nicht irgendein Gott, sondern jetzt spricht das, was du schon als Mensch entwickelt hast; das ist unwert, daß es emporwächst; das ist aus einer Lehre der Täuschung; das ist aus Ahriman, das ist des Satans! - Das liegt in dem Wort: «Hebe dich, Satan, von mir! Du bist mir ärgerlich; denn du meinest nicht, was göttlich, sondern was menschlich ist» (Matth. 16,23). Der Christus nennt ihn gleich den Satan; er wendet gerade das Wort Satan an für Ahriman, während sonst in der Bibel Diabolus steht für alles Luziferische. Da gebraucht der Christus in der Tat für die Täuschung, der sich Petrus noch hingeben muß, das richtige Wort.

So verhalten sich die Dinge wirklich. Was hat nun die moderne, populäre Bibelkritik daraus gemacht? Sie hat gefunden: Es ist doch ganz unmöglich, daß der Christus Jesus gegenübersteht dem Petrus und von ihm das eine Mal sagt: Du hast allein begriffen, daß ein Gott dir gegenübersteht! — während er gleich darauf ihn das andere Mal einen Satan nennt. Und die Bibelkritiker sagen nun: Also muß man daraus schließen, daß das Wort Satan, das Christus zu Petrus gesprochen haben soll, von einem anderen später eingeschoben worden ist, daß es also eine Fälschung ist. - Richtig ist dabei nur, daß die Meinung, die man in der Gegenwart über den tieferen Sinn dieser Worte aus der philologischen Forschung hat, gar nichts wert ist, wenn nicht vorangeht das sachliche Verständnis der biblischen Urkunden. Erst auf Grundlage des sachlichen Verständnisses der Bibel ist es möglich, daß der Mensch wirklich auch etwas sagen kann über die geschichtliche Entstehung der entsprechenden Urkunden.

Aber zwischen diesen beiden Worten, die ich angeführt habe, liegt noch ein anderes. Und das werden wir nur verstehen können, wenn wir ins Auge fassen eine uralte und doch immer neue Mysterienlehre, die Lehre, daß der Mensch, so wie er auf der Erde ist, und nicht nur der Mensch selbst, sondern eine jede Menschengemeinde, eine Art Abbild ist für dasjenige, was im großen Kosmos, im Makrokosmos vor sich geht. Wir haben das insbesondere schildern können bei der Besprechung der Abstammung des Jesus von Nazareth. Wir haben gesehen, wie jenes Wort, das zu Abraham gesprochen ist, eigentlich bedeutet: «Deine Nachkommenschaft soll sein ein Abbild der Ordnung der Sterne am Himmel» (1.Mose 22,17). Was am Himmel ist als die Ordnung der zwölf Sternbilder und als der Gang der Planeten durch den Tierkreis, das soll sich wiederholen in den zwölf Stämmen und in dem, was das hebräische Volk durchmacht durch drei mal vierzehn Generationen hindurch. Also in der Aufeinanderfolge der Generationen mit der eigentümlichen Vererbung durch die Blutsverbände in den zwölf Stämmen soll ein Abbild der makrokosmischen Verhältnisse gegeben werden. Das ist dem Abraham gesagt worden.

In dem Augenblick, da der Christus Jesus den Petrus gegenüber hat, der in seiner tieferen Natur begreifen kann, was eigentlich mit dem Christus-Impuls gegeben ist — die hinunterfließende geistige Kraft durch den Sohn des lebendigen Gottes -, da weiß der Christus, daß er die Umstehenden darauf hinweisen kann, daß jetzt auf der Erde etwas Neues beginnt, ein neues Abbild gegeben werden kann. Während für Abraham in der Blutsverwandtschaft das Abbild der kosmischen Verhältnisse gegeben war, soll jetzt in den ethisch-moralisch-geistigen Verhältnissen ein Abbild dessen geformt werden, was der Mensch durch sein Ich werden kann. Wenn die Menschen verstehen werden in demselben Sinne, wie es die bessere Natur in Petrus versteht, was der Christus ist, dann werden sie nicht nur solche Gemeinschaften, solche Ordnungen einführen, die auf Blutsverwandtschaft beruhen, sondern solche, welche bewußt von Seele zu Seele das Band der Liebe spinnen. Das heißt: Wie in dem jüdischen Blute, in den Fäden, die durch die Generationen hindurchgingen, zusammengefügt war, was im Menschengeschlecht zusammengefügt werden sollte nach dem Vorbild des Maktokosmos, und wie das, was auseinandergelöst war im Menschengeschlecht, eben auch auseinandergelöst war nach den Ordnungen am Himmel, so sollte jetzt aus dem bewußten Ich heraus in den ethisch-moralisch-geistigen Verhältnissen dasjenige entstehen, was die Menschen trennt oder in Liebe zusammenhält. Die Ordnungen der Menschen sollten geformt werden oder harmonisiert werden aus dem bewußten Ich heraus. Das liegt in den Worten, die der Christus Jesus spricht als Fortsetzung der Antwort, die er dem Petrus gegeben hat: «Was du auf Erden binden wirst - was die tiefere Natur in dir bindet -, das ist dasselbe, was im Himmel gebunden ist, und was dieselbe Natur hier unten löst, das ist etwas, was auch im Himmel gelöst wird» (Matth. 16,19).

In den alten Zeiten lag alle Bedeutung des Menschenzusammenhanges in der Blutsverwandtschaft. Immer mehr und mehr aber soll der Mensch hineinwachsen in die geistigen, moralischen, spirituellen Verbände. Wenn wir das ins Auge fassen, müssen wir sagen: Es muß dem Menschen dasjenige, was er als Gemeinde gründet, etwas werden. Wenn wir anthroposophisch sprechen, können wir sagen: Das Einzelkarma des Menschen muß sich verbinden mit dem Karma von Gemeinschaften. Sie können es schon durchaus wissen aus dem, wasinden verflossenen Jahren ausgeführt worden ist. Wie es nicht der Karmaidee widerspricht, wenn ich einem Armen etwas schenke, ebensowenig widerspricht es der Karmaidee, wenn einem Menschen dasjenige, was er als sein Einzelkarma hat, von einer Gemeinde abgenommen wird. Die Gemeinde kann mittragen das Los des einzelnen. Das Karma kann so verbunden werden, daß die Gemeinde mitträgt an dem Karma des einzelnen. Es kann mit anderen Worten folgendes im moralischen Zusammenhange eintreten: Das einzelne Glied innerhalb dieser Gemeinde begeht etwas Unrechtes. Das wird ganz gewiß in das Karma der einzelnen Persönlichkeit eingeschrieben sein, und es muß im großen Weltzusammenhange ausgetragen werden. Aber es kann sich ein anderer Mensch finden, der sagt: Ich helfe dir das Karma austragen! - Erfüllt muß das Karma werden, aber der andere kann ihm helfen. So können ganze Gemeinden dem helfen, der ein Unrecht begangen hat. Es kann der einzelne sein Karma so mit der Gemeinde verflochten haben, daß er, weil die Gemeinde ihn als eines ihrer Glieder betrachtet, etwas, was ihn betrifft, bewußt abgenommen erhält, daß die ganze Gemeinde mitfühlt und mit will den einzelnen bessern; so daß die Gemeinde sprechen kann: Du einzelner hast unrecht getan, aber wir treten für dich ein! Wir übernehmen das, was zur Ausbesserung des Karma führt. - Will man die Gemeinde «Kirche» nennen, so legt sich die Kirche damit die Verpflichtung auf, die Sünden des einzelnen auf sich zu nehmen, sein Karma mitzutragen. Es handelt sich nicht um das, was man heute Sündenvergebung nennt, sondern um ein reales Band, um ein Aufsichnehmen von Sünden. Und darum handelt es sich, daß die Gemeinde dies bewußt auf sich nimmt.

Wenn man in dieser Art und Weise das «Binden» und «Lösen» versteht, dann müßte man bei jeder Sündenvergebung, wenn man sie richtig versteht, an die Verpflichtung denken, die der Gemeinde da heraus erwächst. So spinnt sich dadurch, daß die Fäden der einzelnen verwoben werden in das Karma der ganzen Gesellschaft, ein Netz. Und dieses Netz soll durch das, was der Christus heruntergebracht hat aus geistigen Höhen, in seiner Charakteristik ein Abbild sein der Ordnung am Himmel, das heißt, nach der Ordnung der geistigen Welt soll das Karma des einzelnen mit dem Gesamtkarma verbunden sein, nicht in beliebiger Weise, sondern so, daß der Gemeindeorganismus ein Abbild der Ordnung im Himmel werde. Damit beginnt diese Szene des sogenannten Petrus-Bekenntnisses für die, welche anfangen sie zu verstehen, einen unendlichen tiefen Sinn zu haben. Es ist sozusagen die Stiftung der auf die Ich-Natur gebauten Menschheit der Zukunft. Das ist es, was in diesem vertraulichen Gespräch zwischen dem Christus und seinen nächsten Schülern sich abspielt, daß der Christus überträgt die Kraft, die er aus dem Makrokosmos herunterbringt, auf das, was die Jünger stiften sollen. Und von jetzt ab ist es im Matthäus-Evangelium Schritt für Schritt ein Hinaufführen der Jünger zu dem, was in sie einfließen kann von der Sonnenkraft und Kosmoskraft, welche die Christus-Wesenheit sammelt, um sie auf die Jünger zu übertragen. Wir wissen ja, daß die eine Seite der Initiation ein Hinausgehen in den Makrokosmos ist. Und weil der Christus der Impuls zu einer solchen Initiation ist, deshalb führt er seine Jünger, indem er sie führt, hinaus in den Kosmos. Wie der einzelne zu Initiierende, wenn er diese Initiation durchmacht, bewußt hineinwächst in den Makrokosmos und Stück für Stück von ihm kennenlernt, so schreitet der Christus gleichsam den Makrokosmos ab, zeigt überall die Kräfte, die da spielen und hereinströmen, und überträgt sie auf die Jünger.

Ich habe gestern schon an einer Stelle darauf hingewiesen, wie das geschieht. Stellen wir uns so recht die Szene vor: Ein Mensch schläft ein. Dann liegen im Bette physischer Leib und Ätherleib, während von ihm astralischer Leib und Ich ausgegossen sind in den Kosmos und die Kräfte des Kosmos in diese Glieder eindringen. Träte nun der Christus da zu ihm, so würde er die Wesenheit sein, die ihm bewußt diese Kräfte heranzieht und beleuchtet. So ist es aber gerade mit der Szene, die uns dargestellt wird: Die Jünger fahren hin in der letzten Nachtwache; da sehen sie, daß das, was sie erst für ein Gespenst angeschen haben, der Christus ist, der die Kraft des Makrokosmos in sie einfließen läßt (Matth. 14,25-26). Es ist handgreiflich dargestellt, wie er die Jünger hinführt zu den Kräften des Makrokosmos.

Und die nächsten Szenen des Matthäus-Evangeliums stellen nichts anderes dar, als wie der Christus die Jünger hinausführt Schritt für Schritt die Wege, die der zu Initiierende geht. Es ist so, wie wenn der Christus selbst das durchmachte und Schritt für Schritt seine Jünger an den Händen führte an die Stätten, wohin der zu Initiierende geführt wird. Ich will Ihnen eines sagen, an dem Sie so recht sehen können, wie Schritt für Schritt der Christus die Jünger hinausführt in den Makrokosmos.

Wenn man lebendige Anschauungen hat von der geistigen Welt, und wenn die hellseherischen Kräfte heranwachsen, lernt man so manches kennen, was man vorher nicht kennen kann. So lernt man erkennen, wie eigentlich zum Beispiel der Zusammenhang in den fortschreitenden Wachstumsverhältnissen der Pflanze ist. Der materialistische Sinn wird von der Pflanze sagen: Hier habe ich eine Blüte nehmen wir an eine Blüte, die Früchte trägt -, da wird sich Same entwickeln. Den Samen kann man herausnehmen, kann ihn in die Erde versenken, das Samenkorn verfault, und es erscheint eine neue Pflanze, die auch wieder Samen trägt. So geht es von Pflanzensproß zu Pflanzensptoß weiter. Der materialistische Sinn wird dabei denken, daß irgend etwas von dem verfaulenden Samenkorn übergeht in die neue Pflanze. Der materialistische Sinn kann gar nicht anders denken als, wenn es auch noch so klein, noch so winzig ist, so muß doch irgend etwas materiell übergehen. Aber so ist es nicht. Tatsächlich wird in bezug auf das Materielle die ganze alte Pflanze zerstört. Es geschieht ein Sprung in bezug auf das Materielle, und die neue Pflanze ist materiell etwas ganz Neues. Es geschieht tatsächlich eine Neubildung.

Man lernt nun die wichtigsten Verhältnisse in der Welt dadurch kennen, daß man dieses eigentümliche Gesetz begreifen und anwenden lernt auf den ganzen Makrokosmos, daß in der Tat in bezug auf die materiellen Verhältnisse Sprünge geschehen. Das hat man in den Mysterien in ganz besonderer Weise ausgedrückt. Man hat gesagt: Es muß der zu Initiierende beim Hinausschreiten in den Kosmos auf einer Stufe die Kräfte kennenlernen, die diese Sprünge bewirken. Nun lernt man etwas kennen im Kosmos, wenn man in irgendeiner Richtung geht, die dadurch ausgedrückt wird, daß man die Sternbilder zu Hilfe nimmt. Die sind dann wie Buchstaben. Wenn wir so in einer bestimmten Richtung hinauswachsen, erleben wir das Überspringen von dem Vorfahren zu dem Nachkommen, sei es auf dem Gebiet des Pflanzlichen, des Tierischen, des Menschlichen, oder sei es auf dem Gebiete des planetarischen Daseins; denn auch zum Beispiel beim Übergang vom Saturn zur Sonne ging alles Materielle verloren. Das Geistige blieb, alles Materielle zerstob. Das Geistige war es, das den Sprung bewirkte. Ebenso war es beim Übergang von Sonne zu Mond, vom Mond zur Erde. Im kleinsten und im größten ist das so. - Es gibt nun zwei Zeichen, ein altes, wodurch man bildlicher, mehr in imaginativer Schrift darstellte, und dann ein neueres Zeichen als Darstellung für das Sprunghafte. Das neue können Sie in den Kalendern finden. Wenn die Evolution weitergeht, ringelt das alte sich ein, etwa wie eine Spirale, und die neue Evolution geht dann wie eine zweite Spirale aus der alten hervor, indem sie von innen nach außen weitergeht. Aber es geht die neue Evolution nicht so weiter, daß sie sich unmittelbar an die alte anschließt, sondern zwischen dem Ende der alten und dem Beginn der neuen ist ein kleiner Sprung, dann erst geht es weiter.

Spiral

So erhalten wir diese Figur: Zwei sich ineinandetschlingende Spiralen, in der Mitte ein kleiner Sprung: das Zeichen des Krebses, das uns symbolisieren soll das Hinauswachsen in den Makrokosmos und darstellen soll das Entstehen irgendeines neuen Sprosses innerhalb irgendeiner Evolution.

Nun gab es noch ein anderes Zeichen in der Darstellung dieser Verhältnisse. So sonderbar es ihnen scheinen mag, es war so gebildet, daß man einen Esel und sein Füllen abbildete, den Vorfahren und den Nachkommen. Das sollte darstellen das eigentliche Übergangsverhältnis von einem Zustand in den anderen. Und in der Tat wird sogar das Sternbild des Krebses in alten Abbildungen sehr häufig so dargestellt, daß man einen Esel und sein Füllen abbildete. Das zu wissen ist nicht unwichtig. Es ist eine wichtige Lehre für den Menschen zum Verständnis dessen, daß auch beim Aufstieg in den Makrokosmos ein solcher wichtiger Übergang ist, indem der Mensch hinaufwächst in die geistige Welt, aber dann an ganz neue Erleuchtungen anknüpfen muß, Das wird ganz richtig dargestellt, indem man es in der Sternensprache so darstellt, wie wenn die physische Sonne durchgeht durch das Sternbild des Krebses und, nachdem sie den höchsten Punkt erreicht hat, wieder einen Abstieg durchmacht. So ist es auch, wenn der zu Initiierende erst durchmacht den Aufstieg in die geistige Welt, um die Kräfte kennenzulernen, und dann die Kräfte, wenn er sie erkannt hat, wieder herunterträgt, um sie der Menschheit dienstbar zu machen.

Daß der Christus Jesus dies den Jüngern vorführt, wird im Matthäus-Evangelium (Matth. 21,1-11) wie auch in den anderen Evangelien erzählt. Und es wird so erzählt, daß er nicht durch das bloße Wort wirkt, sondern daß er seinen Jüngern vorführt die Imagination, das lebendige Bild dessen, was er selbst vollzieht, wo er entgegengeht jener Höhe, zu der in der Zeit die Menschheit durch ihre Entwickelung hinansteigen soll. Da gebraucht er das Bild des Esels und seines Füllens; das heißt, er führt die Jünger an das Verstehen dessen hin, was im geistigen Leben entspricht dem Sternbild des Krebses. Das ist also ein Ausdruck für etwas, was sich zugetragen hat in dem geistiglebendigen, spirituellen Verhältnis zwischen dem Christus und seinen Jüngern. Und das ist etwas von solcher Majestät und Größe, daß es nicht ausgedrückt werden kann, indem man Menschenworte aus irgendeiner Sprache wählt, sondern nur dadurch, daß der Christus die Jünger hineinführt in die Verhältnisse der spirituellen Welt und ihnen in den physischen Verhältnissen Abbilder schafft für die makrokosmische Welt. Da führt er sie hinauf bis zu der Stelle, wo die Kräfte des Initiierten wieder nutzbar werden für die Menschheit. Da steht er auf der Höhe, die nur angedeutet werden kann, indem er sagt: Er steht in der Sonnenhöhe in dem Zeichen des Krebses! Kein Wunder daher, wenn das Matthäus-Evangelium an dieser Stelle darauf aufmerksam macht, daß das Christus-Leben für seine Erdenzeit auf seiner Höhe angekommen ist, und mächtig darauf hinweist mit den Worten: «Hosianna in der Höhe!» Da ist jeder Ton so gewählt, daß durch das, was da geschieht, die Jünger heranwachsen, damit wiederum durch das, was in ihnen vorgeht, in der Menschheit heranwachsen kann, was dutch den Christus Jesus in die Entwickelung der Menschheit hat hineingebracht werden können.

Und die nachfolgende Passahgeschichte ist dann nichts anderes als das jetzt real-lebendige Einfließen dessen, was zuerst einfließen sollte in die Jünger als eine Lehre und dann magisch einfließen soll in die Menschheit durch die Kräfte, die vom Mysterium von Golgatha ausgegangen sind. So müssen wir den weiteren Fortgang des MatthäusEvangeliums begreifen. Wir werden dann auch begreifen, wie der Schreiber des Matthäus-Evangeliums sich immer bewußt geblieben ist, daß er sozusagen aufmerksam zu machen hat auf den Kontrast zwischen der lebendigen Lehre, die aus den kosmischen Höhen gehört worden ist, und die für die Jünger gilt, und demjenigen, was den Außenstehenden entgegentreten kann, die nicht empfänglich sind für die Kräfte des Christus Jesus selber. Deshalb treten uns jene Ausführungen entgegen in den Gesprächen mit den Schriftgelehrten und Pharisäern, die wir morgen betrachten wollen. Heute aber wollen wir noch darauf aufmerksam machen, daß der Christus Jesus, nachdem er seine Jünger so weit geführt hat, als es ging, und sie hat teilnehmen lassen an den Stätten, wohin der zu Initiierende geführt wird, er ihnen auch noch in Aussicht gestellt hat, daß, wenn sie diesen Weg gehen, sie selber erleben werden das Hineinwachsen in die geistige Welt des Makrokosmos. Er sagt ihnen, daß sie selber die Veranlagung zur Initiation haben, daß sie ihnen bevorsteht, und daß sie sich hinausleben werden in die makrokosmische Welt, wo sie die wahre Natur des Christus immer mehr und mehr werden erkennen können als desjenigen Wesens, das alle geistigen Räume erfüllt, und das sein Abbild gehabt hat in dem Jesus von Nazareth. Daß sie zu dieser Initiation heranreifen, daß sie Menschheitsinitiierte werden, das mußte der Christus seinen Schülern sagen. Er konnte sie noch darauf aufmerksam machen, daß man zur selbständigen Initiation nur heranwachsen kann, indem man in Geduld und Ausdauer das Innere reifen läßt.

Was muß denn heranwachsen im Inneren des Menschen, wenn das Innere immer mächtiger wird, und wenn der Mensch die hellseherische, höhere Kraft entwickelt? Seine Anlagen müssen so heranwachsen, daß er aufnehmen kann die Kräfte des Geistselbst, des Lebensgeistes und des Geistesmenschen. Wann es aber eintreten wird, daß jene Kraft von oben in ihn hereinleuchten wird, welche den Menschen zum Initiierten, zum Teilnehmer macht an den Reichen der Himmel, das hängt ab von dem Augenblicke, in dem der Mensch reif werden kann; es hängt ab von dem Karma des einzelnen. Wer weiß das? Nur die höchsten Initiierten wissen das. Das wissen die, welche auf niederen Stufen der Initiation stehen, noch nicht. Ist irgendeine Individualität reif, hineinzuwachsen in die geistige Welt, so kommt auch für sie die Stunde des Hineinwachsens. Gewiß, sie kommt, aber sie kommt so, daß es sich der Mensch nicht versicht, sie kommt «wie der Dieb in der Nacht» (Matth. 24,43). Aber wie wächst der Mensch hinein in die geistige Welt?

Die alten und in gewisser Beziehung auch die neueren Mysterien hatten drei Stufen für die makrokosmische Einweihung. Die erste Stufe war die, wo der Mensch so hineinwuchs, daß er alles wahrnahm, was man durch das Geistselbst wahrnehmen kann. Da ist er nicht nur ein Mensch im neuen Sinne, sondern da ist er zu dem hinaufgewachsen, was man im Sinne der Hierarchien die Engelnatur nennt; das ist die nächste über dem Menschen stehende Hierarchie. So nannte man in den persischen Mysterien auch den, der hineinwuchs in den Makrokosmos, so daß das Geistselbst in ihm tätig war, entweder einen «Perser», weil ein solcher nicht mehr ein einzelner war, sondern dem Engel des persischen Volkes angehörte. Oder man nannte solche Menschen direkt Engel oder Gottesnaturen. Die nächste Stufe ist dann die, wo der Lebensgeist entsprechend erwacht. Einen Menschen auf dieser Stufe nannte man entweder einen «Sonnenhelden» im Sinne der persischen Mysterien, weil er dann aufnahm die Kraft der Sonne, sich von unten heraufentwickelte zu den Kräften der Sonne, wo die geistige Kraft der Sonne der Erde entgegenkam, man nannte ihn aber auch einen «Sohn des Vaters». Und denjenigen, in den das Atma oder der Geistesmensch hineinragte, nannte man in den alten Mysterien den «Vater». Das waren die drei Stufen des zu Initiierenden: Engel, Sohn oder Sonnenheld und Vater.

Nur die höchsten Initiierten haben ein Urteil darüber, wann im Menschen die Initiation erwachen kann. Daher sagte der Christus: Die Initiation wird kommen, wenn ihr auf den Wegen weiterschreitet, die ich euch jetzt geführt habe. Ihr werdet aufsteigen in die Reiche der Himmel, aber die Stunde ist weder bekannt den Engeln, die mit dem Geistselbst initiiert sind, noch dem Sohn, dem mit dem Lebensgeist Initiierten, sondern nur den höchsten Eingeweihten, die mit dem «Vater» initiiert sind. - Daher spricht hier wieder ein Wort des MatthäusEvangeliums zu uns, das absolut konform ist mit der Mysterientradition. Und wir werden sehen, daß die Verkündigung des Reiches der Himmel nichts anderes ist als die Voraussage an die Jünger, daß sie die Initiation erleben werden. Daß er das meint, darüber spricht sich der Christus Jesus des Matthäus-Evangeliums noch besonders aus (Matth. 24). Wenn man die Stelle richtig liest, um die es sich da handelt, kann man es mit Händen greifen, daß der Christus auf gewisse Lehren hinweisen will, die damals im Umlauf waren über das Hinaufwachsen in die Reiche der Himmel. Man hatte dieses Hinaufwachsen in die Reiche der Himmel materiell genommen, indem man glaubte, daß die ganze Erde hinaufwachsen würde, während man hätte wissen müssen, daß nur einzelne zu Initiierende durch ihre Initiation hinaufwachsen; das heißt, es entstand die Anschauung bei einzelnen, daß demnächst in materieller Weise eine Transformation der Erde in den Himmel stattfinden werde. Und der Christus macht noch besonders darauf aufmerksam, indem er sagt, daß welche kommen werden, die das behaupten. Er nennt sie Lügenpropheten und falsche Messiasse (Matth. 24,24). Deshalb ist es ganz sonderbar, daß heute noch einige der Evangelienerklärer davon fabeln, daß die Anschauung von einem materiell herannahenden Gottesreich eine Lehre des Christus Jesus selber gewesen sei. Wer das Matthäus-Evangelium wirklich lesen kann, der weiß, daß das, was der Christus Jesus meint, ein spirituelle Vorgang ist, zu dem der zu Initiierende hinaufwächst, zu dem aber auch im Laufe der Erdenentwickelung die ganze Menschheit, welche sich an den Christus hält, hinaufwachsen wird, aber hinaufwachsen wird, indem sich die Erde selber vergeistigt.

‚Auch von dieser Seite müssen wir tiefer hineinblicken in das ganze Gefüge des Matthäus-Evangeliums, und wir bekommen dann auch vor diesem Evangelium jene große Ehrfurcht insbesondere auch dadurch, daß wir sozusagen in keinem anderen Evangelium so leicht dahin geführt werden können, förmlich zu belauschen, wie der Christus Jesus zuerst vom Ich-Standpunkte aus seine Schüler belehrt. Wir sehen seine Schüler um ihn stehen und sehen, wie durch den Menschenleib das hindurchwirkt, was die Kräfte des Kosmos sind. Wir sehen, wie er seine Jünger an der Hand führt, damit sie kennenlernen können, was der zu Initiierende lernen kann. Wir belauschen menschliche Verhältnisse, wie sie sich bilden können um den Christus Jesus. Das macht uns das Matthäus-Evangelium zu einem so menschlich nahen Produkt. Wir lernen so recht durch das Matthäus-Evangelium den Menschen Jesus von Nazareth, den Träger des Christus, kennen. Wir lernen alles kennen, was er wirkt, indem er sich herabläßt in die menschliche Natur. Ja, auch die Himmelsvorgänge sind in den Tatsachen des Matthäus-Evangeliums in so recht menschliche Verhältnisse gekleidet.

Wie dies auch für die anderen, nicht nur für die Verhältnisse der Initiation der Fall ist, davon in dem nächsten, letzten Vortrag.

Eleventh Lecture

The story of temptation, which we were able to present as an impulse for a special kind of initiation, was followed by what Christ Jesus was initially able to become for his disciples as the disseminator of the ancient teachings in a completely new form, and then what he was able to become not only as the disseminator of teachings, but, if the expression may be used, as a force, as a healing force for human beings. This is depicted in the healings. Then yesterday we made the transition which, as I said, requires a certain goodwill to understand, a goodwill that arises from processing the spiritual scientific insights that one has absorbed over the years. We made the transition to that peculiar kind of living teaching through the transmission of forces that emanated from Christ Jesus and, so to speak, radiated into the souls of his disciples. And we tried as best we could to express a tremendous mystery in human words. We have tried to draw attention to what this teaching was that Christ Jesus had to give to his disciples. He was a kind of gathering point, a gathering being for forces that flowed from the macrocosm into the conditions of the earth and were to stream to the souls of the disciples, and which could only be gathered by those forces that were united in the being of Christ Jesus. The forces that otherwise flow to human beings only unconsciously during sleep flowed from worlds far away through the being of Christ Jesus to the disciples as the instructive and life-giving forces of the cosmos itself. In detail, of course, these forces, which are enlightening forces about the existence of the world, can only be characterized if one enters into the various constellations in the cosmos. And we will have to refer to this mystery again today, insofar as it is presented in the Gospel of Matthew. But first we must make clear how the disciples had to grow in wisdom in relation to the conditions on earth through the forces of Christ Jesus shining upon them. They had to grow, so to speak, within themselves, in their lives, in their living wisdom, growing in the most diverse ways.

Now we are presented with a peculiar kind of growth in one of the disciples or apostles. But we will only understand this individual, particularly significant aspect of an apostle's life if we take it out of its larger context. We must realize that human beings progress in the evolution of humanity. We do not go through incarnation after incarnation for nothing. Thus, in the post-Atlantean period, we did not go through incarnations in vain during the first post-Atlantean cultural period, the Indian, then the Persian, the Egyptian-Chaldean, Greek-Latin, and so on. Rather, we go through these incarnations as a great school of life so that in each of these incarnations we can absorb something from the environment based on the conditions that exist in these cultural periods. In this way, we gradually grow. And what does this growth of the human being consist of throughout the individual epochs of human evolution?

As we know from the elementary insights of anthroposophy, human beings have different members of their being. If we want to list them in our sense, we have the physical body, the etheric body, the astral body, connected to the astral body the feeling soul, then the intellectual or emotional soul, the consciousness soul. Then we have the higher members of human nature, toward which we evolve: the spirit self, the life spirit, and the spirit human being. Now, in each of the post-Atlantean cultural epochs, something was indeed given to us for these individual members of our human nature. Thus, in the first epoch, in the ancient Indian culture, something was added to human beings in the way of powers, whereby they became more in their etheric body than they had been before. What was to be imprinted on them in this respect in their physical body had already been added to them in the last stages of the Atlantean period. With the etheric body, on the other hand, those gifts begin which were to come to human beings during the post-Atlantean period. Thus, in ancient Indian times, the forces that were to be implanted in his etheric body were given to him; then, in the ancient Persian period, the forces that were to be implanted in his astral body, the body of feeling; and during the Egyptian-Chaldean period, the forces for the feeling soul. During the fourth cultural period, the Greek-Latin period, the forces of the intellectual or emotional soul were imprinted upon him; and now we are living in the age when the corresponding forces belonging to this line are to be gradually imprinted upon the consciousness soul. Humanity has not yet progressed very far in this imprinting. Then a sixth post-Atlantean period will come, in which the forces of the spirit self will be imprinted into human nature, and in the seventh cultural state, the forces of the life spirit. And then we will look forward to a distant future, when the spirit man or Atma will be imprinted into normal humanity.

Now let us consider this human development in relation to the individual human being. The way we must now view the human being is the way those who knew something of the true relationships of these things from the sacred mysteries always viewed him. The disciples also had to learn to view him in this way, little by little, through the life-giving, instructive power that flowed out from Christ Jesus and passed over to them. We can therefore say that when we look at human beings—now or even at the time of Christ Jesus—there are potentialities within them, just as there are potentialities in a plant, which are already present even when the plant has only green leaves and no flowers or fruit. We look at such a plant, which has only green leaves, and we know that as long as the plant is there, it already has within itself the potential for blossoming and bearing fruit, which it will develop if everything goes according to plan. Just as it is certain that blossoms and fruit will grow out of the plant, even if it only has green leaves, so it is certain that out of the human being who, as was the case at the time of Christ Jesus, has only a sentient soul and a soul of understanding or feeling, the consciousness soul will grow out of it, which will then open itself to the spirit self, so that the highest Trinity can flow to the human being as something new, like a divine-spiritual gift. Therefore, we can say that human beings unfold from what their soul contents are, from what their soul qualities are. Just as a plant that has only green leaves unfolds into blossom and fruit, so human beings unfold in such a way that from the sentient soul, the intellectual soul, and the conscious soul, they hold out something like a blossom of their being toward that comes down to them as something divine from above, so that through the reception of the spirit self they can go further on the path to the heights of human development.

In this way, people who at the time of Christ Jesus had only developed their outer selves in a normal way could say: Yes, now only the intellectual or emotional soul is normally developed, which cannot yet take in the spirit self, but out of the same human being who has now developed the intellectual or emotional soul as the highest, the consciousness soul will develop as his child, as his result, which can then open itself to the spirit self.

And what the human being had to unfold, so to speak, as the flower of his whole being, what grew out of him, what resulted from his nature, what was this called in the mysteries? How did one have to call it in the environment of Christ Jesus if the disciples really wanted to make progress? It was called — if we want to translate it into our language — with the expression “Son of Man”; for the Greek word υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου does not have the restricted meaning of our “son” as “son of a father,” but rather as the offspring of a being, something that grows out of a being like a flower grows out of a plant that has only leaves. Therefore, when normal human beings had not yet developed that flower of their being in their consciousness soul, they could not yet say anything about the υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου within themselves: Yes, normal human beings have not yet developed anything of the “Son of Man,” but there must always be people who advance their race, who already have within themselves the knowledge and life of a later epoch. Among the leaders of humanity there must be those who, in the fourth period, when normally only the intellectual or emotional soul is developed, nevertheless, although they look outwardly like other people, have already developed within themselves the possibility of the consciousness soul, into which the spirit self shines. And such “sons of men” did exist. And the disciples of Christ Jesus were therefore to grow up to understand the nature and essence of these leaders of humanity.

In order to ascertain what they thought about this, Christ Jesus first asked his intimate disciples, his followers: Tell me something about the beings, about the people who can be said to be sons of men of this race. - This is how one would have to ask the question if one wanted to ask it in the sense of the Aramaic original of the Gospel of Matthew; for I have already pointed out that in the Greek translation, if one understands it well, everything is still better than it is interpreted today, but that nevertheless some things have necessarily become unclear in the translation from the Aramaic original. So we must imagine Christ Jesus standing before his disciples and asking them: What is the prevailing view about which of those people of the previous generation, who already belonged to the Greek-Latin period, were sons of men? They listed them for him: Elijah, John the Baptist, Jeremiah, and other prophets. The disciples knew through the teaching power that had come to them through Christ that those leaders had absorbed forces within themselves through which they had grown up to the point of understanding the Son of Man. On the same occasion, one of the disciples, commonly called Peter, gave another answer (Matthew 16:13-16).

In order to understand this other answer, we must allow what we have just shown in the past few days as the mission of Christ Jesus in the sense of the Gospel of Matthew to be written firmly in our souls: that through the Christ impulse, human beings were given the opportunity to develop full self-consciousness, to bring to its highest flowering that which lies in the “I am.” In other words, even in initiation, human beings should grow into the higher worlds in such a way that the self-consciousness that we as normal human beings today have only for the physical world is fully preserved on all paths up to the higher worlds. This was made possible by the existence of Christ Jesus in the physical world. So we can say: It is Christ Jesus who represents the power that has given humanity the full consciousness of “I am.”

I have already pointed out in particular how the interpretations of the Gospels by liberal or even anti-Gospel movements usually fail to emphasize what is important. They always point out that individual word sequences in the Gospels and so on have already occurred somewhere before. For example, they might point out that even the content of the Beatitudes was already there before. But what was not there — and we must point this out again and again — what could not be achieved earlier while maintaining the ego-consciousness of human beings, will be achieved through the Christ impulse for human individuality! This is extremely significant. I have analyzed the individual elements of the Beatitudes and shown that the first sentence must read: “Blessed are those who hunger for spirit,” because, according to human evolution, those who can no longer look into the spiritual world in the sense of ancient clairvoyance are poor in spirit. But Christ gives them comfort and enlightenment: even if they can no longer see into the spiritual world through the old clairvoyant organs, they will now be able to see into it through themselves, through their I, for “through themselves they will find the kingdoms of heaven” (Matthew 5:3). The same applies to the second sentence: “Blessed are those who mourn” (Matthew 5:4). They no longer need to grow into the spheres of the spiritual world through the old clairvoyant faculties; they will develop their ego in such a way that they can grow up into the spiritual world. But to do this, the ego must increasingly absorb the power that was once anchored on earth in Christ as a unique being.

People today should really think a little bit about this: It is not for nothing that in these beatitudes of the Sermon on the Mount, there is a very important Greek word in every single sentence: Ὅτι αὐτῶν ἐστιν ἡ βασιλεία τῶν οὐρανῶν. If we take the first sentence, for example: “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,” it would then continue: “In themselves” — or “through themselves they will have the kingdom of heaven.” This “in themselves” is always referred to; in the second sentence, in the third sentence, and so on, it is always pointed out. Forgive me if I now point out something great about our time in a very trivial way. Our time will have to decide not to apply the word αὐτῶν “auton” — which lies in our “automobile” — merely to machines, not always to understand it in the most external way, but it will have to decide to understand the peculiarity of ὅτι αὐτῶν, of putting into operation, in the spiritual realm as well. This is something that our age may well take as a warning: in relation to machines, it loves to put individuality into operation; but in relation to what was formerly outside the consciousness of the I, and what was experienced outside of ego-consciousness in all the ancient mysteries up to the Christ event, humanity must also learn to set through uniqueness into operation, so that human beings can gradually become the self-creative originators of all this. And this is precisely what humanity today will learn to understand when it permeates itself with the Christ impulse.

When we consider this, we will say: The question that Christ Jesus asked the disciples on the other side has a very special meaning. First he asked: Who among those who were the leaders of this race could be called a Son of Man? And the disciples pointed to some of the leaders. Then he asked something else. He wanted to gradually lead them to understand his own nature, to understand what he represents for the I-ness. This lies in the other question: “And what do you think I am?” And the “I am” must be emphasized in every single case, especially in the Gospel of Matthew. Peter gave an answer which meant that he now designated Christ not merely as the Son of Man, but that he designated him — and we can always translate the word as it is commonly used — as the “Son of the living God.” What is the “Son of the living God” in contrast to the “Son of Man”? To understand this concept, we must supplement the facts we have stated earlier.

We have said that human beings develop in such a way that they unfold the consciousness soul in their being, in which the spirit self can appear. But once he has developed the consciousness soul, the spirit self, the life spirit, and the spirit man must, as it were, rise up to meet him so that his blossoming consciousness can take in this higher trinity. We can also represent this upward development of man graphically, as if it were the upward development of a kind of plant:

Flowering of Man

In the consciousness soul, the human being opens up, and the spirit self or manas, the life spirit or buddhi, and the spirit man or atma come to meet him. This is something that comes to meet the human being from above, as it were, as the spirit that fertilizes him. While the human being grows upward from below with the other members and opens himself to the blossoming of the Son of Man, when he goes further and wants to take in complete ego-consciousness, what comes toward him from above must be what brings him the spirit self, the life spirit, and the spirit man. And who is the representative of that which is brought down to him from above, which points to the most distant future of humanity? We receive the first gift as the spirit self. Who is the representative of the one who will bring the gift of the descending spirit self? It is the Son of God who lives, the life spirit, the “Son of the living God”!

So Christ Jesus asks at this moment: What must come to human beings through my impulse? That which is the life-giving spirit principle from above must come to human beings! Thus, the “Son of Man,” who grows from below upward, stands opposite the Son of God, the “Son of the living God,” who grows from above downward. We must distinguish between them. But we must understand that this question was more difficult for the disciples. The full difficulty of this question for the disciples becomes particularly clear when you consider that the disciples only received what the simplest people had already been given through the Gospels after the time of Christ Jesus. The disciples first had to take it all in through the living teachers of Christ Jesus. They did not have the capacity to understand what could answer the question: Whose representative am I myself? It is pointed out that one of the disciples, named Peter, gave the answer: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God” (Matthew 16:16). At that moment, this was an answer that, if we may say so, did not come from Peter's normal mental powers. And Christ Jesus—let us try to bring this to life by appealing to the imagination in a certain sense—must have said to himself as he looked at Peter: It is significant that this answer has come from his mouth, an answer that points, so to speak, to a distant future. And when He then looked at what was in Peter's consciousness, what was already there in him, so that he could give such an answer with his intellect or with the powers he had attained through initiation, then Christ must have said to Himself: This does not come from what Peter knows consciously; it is the deeper forces within man speaking, which man only gradually transforms into conscious forces.

We carry within us the physical body, the etheric body, the astral body, and the I. We ascend to the spirit self, the life spirit, and the spirit man through the transformation of the forces of the astral body, the etheric body, and the physical body. This has often been described in elementary spiritual science. But the forces that we will one day develop in our astral body as our spiritual self are already present in our astral body; only they are developed by divine spiritual powers and not by us. And in the same way, a divine spiritual life spirit is already present in our etheric body. That is why Christ says, looking at Peter: What is present in your consciousness did not come from you; something spoke that you will only develop in the future, something that is within you but of which you are not yet aware. What is already in your flesh and blood cannot yet speak in such a way that the words “You are Christ, the Son of the living God” come to light, but rather the divine-spiritual forces lying deep beneath the threshold of consciousness speak, even the deepest ones that lie within the human being. The mysterious higher power in Peter, which Christ calls the “Father in Heaven,” the forces from which Peter was born but of which he is not yet conscious, spoke through him at that moment. Hence the words: “What you are now as a man of flesh and blood did not inspire you, but the Father in Heaven” (Matthew 16:17).

But Christ had something else to say. He had to say to himself: In Peter I have before me a nature, a disciple whose entire human constitution is such that the forces that have already developed consciousness, that the entire manner in which the activity of the spirit works, do not disturb the Father's power within him; this subconscious human power is so strong that he can build upon it when he surrenders himself to this subconscious human power. That is what is important in him, Christ could say to himself. But what is in him is also in every human being. It is just not yet sufficiently conscious; that will only develop in the future. If what I have to give to humanity, and for which I am the impulse, is to develop further and take hold of people, it must be based on what Peter just said: “You are Christ, the Son of the living God!” On this rock in human beings, which has not yet been destroyed by the raging waves of already developed consciousness, what speaks as the power of the Father, I want to build what is to spring forth more and more from my impulse. And when human beings develop this foundation, what will emerge is what will be the Christ impulse for humanity. This is contained in the words: “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build what a community of human beings can produce, what a sum of human beings who profess the Christ impulse can produce!” (Matthew 16:18).

As easy as the discussions flow today—for there is a special dispute about these words almost all over the world—these words in the Gospel of Matthew are truly not to be taken lightly. They can only be understood if one draws them from the depths of that wisdom which is at the same time the wisdom of the mysteries.

And now something else must be shown clearly and distinctly: namely, that Christ Jesus is truly building on the deeper, subconscious power in Peter. For in the next moment, Christ speaks of the next events that are to take place. He begins to speak of what is to happen as the mystery on Golgotha. And now the moment is already past when what lies deeper in Peter speaks; now what speaks in Peter is what is already conscious in him. Now he cannot understand what Christ means by this, cannot believe that suffering and death are to come. And where the conscious Peter speaks, who has already developed his own conscious powers within himself, Christ must rebuke him, saying: Now it is not some god who speaks, but what you have already developed as a human being; that is unworthy of rising up; that comes from a teaching of deception; that comes from Ahriman, that is of Satan! This is contained in the words: “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me, for you are not setting your mind on God's interests, but on human interests” (Matthew 16:23). Christ calls him Satan; he uses the word Satan specifically for Ahriman, whereas elsewhere in the Bible Diabolus stands for everything Luciferian. Here Christ is indeed using the right word for the deception to which Peter must still succumb.

This is how things really are. What has modern, popular Bible criticism made of this? It has concluded: It is quite impossible that Christ should stand before Peter and say to him on the one hand, “You alone have understood that a god stands before you!” — while immediately afterwards he calls him Satan. And the Bible critics now say: We must therefore conclude that the word Satan, which Christ is supposed to have spoken to Peter, was inserted later by someone else, that it is therefore a forgery. The only thing that is correct here is that the opinion that philological research has formed in the present day about the deeper meaning of these words is worthless unless it is preceded by a factual understanding of the biblical documents. Only on the basis of a factual understanding of the Bible is it possible for human beings to say anything meaningful about the historical origin of the corresponding documents.

But between these two words I have quoted there is another. And we can only understand this if we consider an ancient and yet ever new mystery teaching, the teaching that human beings, as they are on earth, and not only human beings themselves, but every human community, are a kind of image of what is happening in the great cosmos, in the macrocosm. We were able to describe this in particular when discussing the ancestry of Jesus of Nazareth. We saw how the words spoken to Abraham actually mean: “Your descendants shall be a reflection of the order of the stars in the sky” (Genesis 22:17). What is in the heavens as the order of the twelve constellations and as the course of the planets through the zodiac is to be repeated in the twelve tribes and in what the Hebrew people go through over three times fourteen generations. Thus, in the succession of generations with the peculiar inheritance through the blood ties in the twelve tribes, a reflection of the macrocosmic relationships is to be given. This was said to Abraham.

At the moment when Christ Jesus stands before Peter, who in his deeper nature can understand what is actually given in the Christ impulse — the spiritual power flowing down through the Son of the living God — Christ knows that He can point out to those standing around Him that something new is now beginning on earth, that a new image can be given. Whereas for Abraham the image of cosmic conditions was given in blood relationship, now an image of what human beings can become through their I is to be formed in ethical, moral, and spiritual conditions. When people understand what Christ is in the same sense as the better nature in Peter understands it, they will not only introduce communities and orders based on blood relationship, but also those that consciously weave the bond of love from soul to soul. That is to say: just as in Jewish blood, in the threads that ran through the generations, there was a union of what was to be united in the human race according to the model of the macrocosm, and just as what was dissolved in the human race was also separated according to the orders in heaven, so now, out of the conscious I, in ethical, moral, and spiritual relationships, there should arise that which separates people or holds them together in love. The orders of human beings should be formed or harmonized out of the conscious I. This is contained in the words spoken by Christ Jesus as a continuation of the answer he gave to Peter: “Whatever you bind on earth—whatever binds the deeper nature within you—is the same as what is bound in heaven, and whatever you loose here below is something that is also loosed in heaven” (Matthew 16:19).

In ancient times, all the significance of human relationships lay in blood ties. But more and more, human beings are to grow into spiritual, moral, and spiritual associations. When we consider this, we must say: What human beings establish as a community must become something for them. Speaking anthroposophically, we can say that the individual karma of human beings must connect with the karma of communities. You already know this from what has been explained in previous years. Just as it does not contradict the idea of karma if I give something to a poor person, it is no less contrary to the idea of karma if a community takes away from a person what he has as his individual karma. The community can share the fate of the individual. Karma can be connected in such a way that the community shares in the karma of the individual. In other words, the following can happen in a moral context: An individual member of this community commits an injustice. This will certainly be recorded in the karma of the individual personality and must be carried out in the greater world context. But another person may come along and say, “I will help you carry out your karma!” The karma must be fulfilled, but the other person can help. In this way, entire communities can help those who have committed wrongdoing. The individual may have intertwined his karma with the community in such a way that, because the community regards him as one of its members, he consciously receives something that concerns him, so that the whole community feels with him and wants to help him improve; so that the community can say: You, as an individual, have done wrong, but we stand up for you! We take on what is necessary to improve your karma. If one wants to call the community “church,” then the church thereby imposes on itself the obligation to take upon itself the sins of the individual, to share his karma. This is not what we call forgiveness of sins today, but a real bond, a taking upon oneself of sins. And that is what it means for the community to consciously take this upon itself.

If one understands “binding” and “releasing” in this way, then with every forgiveness of sins, if one understands it correctly, one must think of the obligation that arises for the community. In this way, the threads of the individual are woven into the karma of the whole society, forming a net. And this net, through what Christ brought down from spiritual heights, is to be in its character a reflection of the order in heaven, that is, according to the order of the spiritual world, the karma of the individual is to be connected with the total karma, not in any arbitrary way, but in such a way that the community organism becomes a reflection of the order in heaven. Thus, for those who begin to understand it, this scene of the so-called confession of Peter begins to have an infinitely deep meaning. It is, so to speak, the foundation of the humanity of the future, built on the nature of the I. This is what takes place in this confidential conversation between Christ and his closest disciples: Christ transfers the power he brings down from the macrocosm to what the disciples are to establish. And from now on, in the Gospel of Matthew, there is a step-by-step leading up of the disciples to what can flow into them from the sun's power and the power of the cosmos, which the Christ being gathers in order to transfer it to the disciples. We know that one side of initiation is going out into the macrocosm. And because Christ is the impulse for such an initiation, he leads his disciples out into the cosmos. Just as the individual initiate, when undergoing this initiation, consciously grows into the macrocosm and gradually gets to know it, so Christ, as it were, traverses the macrocosm, showing everywhere the forces that are at work and flowing in, and transmits them to the disciples.

I already pointed out yesterday how this happens. Let us imagine the scene: a person falls asleep. Then the physical body and etheric body lie in the bed, while the astral body and I am poured out into the cosmos and the forces of the cosmos penetrate these limbs. If Christ were to appear to him now, he would be the being who consciously draws these forces to him and illuminates him. But this is precisely what happens in the scene that is presented to us: the disciples are sailing during the last watch of the night; they see that what they first took to be a ghost is Christ, who is allowing the power of the macrocosm to flow into them (Matthew 14:25-26). It is vividly depicted how he leads the disciples to the forces of the macrocosm.

And the next scenes in the Gospel of Matthew depict nothing other than how Christ leads the disciples step by step along the paths that the initiate must walk. It is as if Christ himself went through this and led his disciples step by step by the hand to the places where the initiate is led. I want to tell you something that will show you very clearly how Christ leads his disciples step by step into the macrocosm.

When one has living perceptions of the spiritual world, and when clairvoyant powers grow, one learns many things that one cannot know before. One learns, for example, to recognize the connection between the progressive stages of growth in a plant. The materialistic mind will say of the plant: Here I have a flower—let us assume a flower that bears fruit—and seeds will develop. The seeds can be removed, buried in the earth, and the seed will rot, and a new plant will appear, which will also bear seeds. And so it continues from plant sprout to plant sprout. The materialistic sense will think that something from the rotting seed passes into the new plant. The materialistic sense cannot think otherwise than that, even if it is still so small, so tiny, something material must pass over. But that is not the case. In fact, in relation to the material, the whole old plant is destroyed. A leap occurs in relation to the material, and the new plant is materially something completely new. A new formation actually takes place.

We now learn about the most important relationships in the world by understanding this peculiar law and applying it to the entire macrocosm, namely that leaps do indeed occur in relation to material conditions. This was expressed in a very special way in the mysteries. It was said that when stepping out into the cosmos, the initiate must first become acquainted with the forces that cause these leaps. Now, one learns something in the cosmos when one goes in a certain direction, which is expressed by using the constellations as aids. These are then like letters. When we grow out in a certain direction, we experience the leap from ancestor to descendant, whether in the plant, animal, or human realm, or in the realm of planetary existence; for, for example, in the transition from Saturn to the Sun, everything material was lost. The spiritual remained, everything material scattered. It was the spiritual that brought about the leap. The same was true of the transition from the Sun to the Moon, and from the Moon to the Earth. This is true in the smallest and in the largest. There are now two signs, an old one, which was used to represent things more figuratively, in an imaginative script, and then a newer sign to represent the leap. You can find the new one in the calendars. As evolution continues, the old sign curls up, like a spiral, and the new evolution emerges from the old like a second spiral, continuing from the inside out. But the new evolution does not continue immediately after the old one; there is a small leap between the end of the old and the beginning of the new, and only then does it continue.

Spiral

This gives us the following figure: two spirals intertwined with a small jump in the middle: the sign of Cancer, which is meant to symbolize our growth into the macrocosm and represent the emergence of some new sprout within some evolution.

There was another sign in the representation of these relationships. As strange as it may seem to you, it was formed in such a way that it depicted a donkey and its foal, the ancestor and the descendant. This was supposed to represent the actual transition from one state to another. And in fact, even the constellation of Cancer is very often depicted in ancient illustrations as a donkey and its foal. This is not unimportant to know. It is an important lesson for humans to understand that even in the ascent into the macrocosm there is such an important transition, in that humans grow up into the spiritual world, but then have to connect with completely new insights. This is very correctly represented in the language of the stars, as if the physical sun passes through the constellation of Cancer and, after reaching its highest point, descends again. So it is when the initiate first ascends into the spiritual world to learn about the forces, and then, once he has recognized them, carries them back down again to make them available to humanity.

That Christ Jesus demonstrates this to his disciples is recounted in the Gospel of Matthew (Matthew 21:1-11) as well as in the other Gospels. And it is recounted that he does not work through mere words, but that he shows his disciples the imagination, the living image of what he himself is accomplishing, where he is going toward that height to which humanity is to ascend in time through its development. He uses the image of the donkey and its load; that is, he leads the disciples to understand what corresponds in spiritual life to the constellation of Cancer. This is therefore an expression of something that took place in the spiritually living relationship between Christ and his disciples. And this is something of such majesty and greatness that it cannot be expressed by choosing human words from any language, but only by Christ leading the disciples into the conditions of the spiritual world and creating images for the macrocosmic world in physical conditions. He leads them up to the place where the forces of the initiate become usable again for humanity. There he stands at a height that can only be hinted at when he says: He stands at the height of the sun in the sign of Cancer! No wonder, then, that the Gospel of Matthew draws attention at this point to the fact that the life of Christ has reached its height during his time on earth, and powerfully points this out with the words: “Hosanna in the highest!” Every tone is chosen so that through what is happening, the disciples grow, so that in turn, through what is happening within them, what Christ Jesus was able to bring into the development of humanity can grow within humanity.

And the Passover story that follows is nothing other than the now real and living inflow of what was first to flow into the disciples as a teaching and then magically into humanity through the forces that emanated from the Mystery of Golgotha. This is how we must understand the further course of the Gospel of Matthew. We will then also understand how the writer of the Gospel of Matthew always remained conscious that he had to draw attention, so to speak, to the contrast between the living teaching that had been heard from the cosmic heights and that which applies to the disciples, and that which can confront outsiders who are not receptive to the forces of Christ Jesus himself. That is why we encounter these statements in the conversations with the scribes and Pharisees that we will consider tomorrow. Today, however, we want to draw attention to the fact that Christ Jesus, after leading his disciples as far as he could and allowing them to participate in the places where the initiate is led, also promised them that if they followed this path, they themselves would experience growing into the spiritual world of the macrocosm. He tells them that they themselves have the predisposition for initiation, that it awaits them, and that they will live themselves out into the macrocosmic world, where they will be able to recognize more and more the true nature of Christ as the being who fills all spiritual spaces and who had his image in Jesus of Nazareth. Christ had to tell his disciples that they would mature to this initiation and become initiates of humanity. He could also point out to them that one can only grow to independent initiation by allowing the inner self to mature with patience and perseverance.

What must grow within the human being when the inner life becomes ever more powerful and when the human being develops clairvoyant, higher powers? His faculties must grow so that he can take in the powers of the spirit itself, the life spirit, and the spirit-human being. But when that power from above will shine into him, making him an initiate, a participant in the riches of heaven, depends on the moment when the human being can become mature; it depends on the karma of the individual. Who knows this? Only the highest initiates know this. Those who stand on lower stages of initiation do not yet know this. When any individuality is ready to grow into the spiritual world, the hour of its growth will come. It will certainly come, but it will come in such a way that the person does not expect it; it will come “like a thief in the night” (Matthew 24:43). But how does a person grow into the spiritual world?

The ancient mysteries, and in a certain sense also the more recent ones, had three stages for macrocosmic initiation. The first stage was where the human being grew into it so that he perceived everything that can be perceived through the spirit self. There he is not only a human being in the new sense, but he has grown up to what is called the angelic nature in the sense of the hierarchies; this is the hierarchy immediately above the human being. In the Persian mysteries, someone who grew into the macrocosm so that the spirit self was active within them was called either a “Persian,” because they were no longer an individual but belonged to the angel of the Persian people. Or such people were called angels or divine natures. The next stage is then that in which the life spirit awakens accordingly. A human being at this stage was called either a “sun hero” in the sense of the Persian mysteries, because he then took up the power of the sun and developed from below to the powers of the sun, where the spiritual power of the sun met the earth, but he was also called a “son of the Father.” And those in whom the Atma or spiritual man protruded were called “Father” in the ancient mysteries. These were the three stages of the initiate: angel, son or sun hero, and father.

Only the highest initiates can judge when initiation can awaken in a person. That is why Christ said: Initiation will come when you continue on the paths I have now led you. You will ascend into the realms of heaven, but the hour is known neither to the angels who are initiated with the spirit self, nor to the Son, who is initiated with the life spirit, but only to the highest initiates who are initiated with the “Father.” - Here again, a word from the Gospel of Matthew speaks to us that is absolutely in accordance with the mystery tradition. And we will see that the proclamation of the kingdom of heaven is nothing other than the prediction to the disciples that they will experience initiation. The Christ Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew speaks specifically about what he means by this (Matthew 24). If one reads the passage in question correctly, one can clearly see that Christ wants to point to certain teachings that were circulating at that time about growing up into the kingdoms of heaven. People had taken this ascension into the kingdoms of heaven in a material sense, believing that the whole earth would ascend, whereas they should have known that only individuals undergoing initiation would ascend through their initiation; that is, the view arose among some individuals that a transformation of the earth into heaven would soon take place in a material sense. And Christ draws particular attention to this when He says that there will be those who come and claim this. He calls them false prophets and false messiahs (Matthew 24:24). It is therefore very strange that even today some interpreters of the Gospels still fantasize that the view of a materially approaching kingdom of God was a teaching of Christ Jesus Himself. Anyone who can truly read the Gospel of Matthew knows that what Christ Jesus means is a spiritual process toward which the initiate grows, but toward which all of humanity that holds fast to Christ will also grow in the course of Earth's development, but will grow by the Earth itself becoming spiritualized.

'From this side, too, we must look more deeply into the whole structure of the Gospel of Matthew, and then we will also gain great reverence for this Gospel, especially because no other Gospel leads us so easily, so to speak, to eavesdrop on how Christ Jesus first teaches his disciples from the standpoint of the I. We see his disciples standing around him and see how the forces of the cosmos work through the human body. We see how he leads his disciples by the hand so that they can learn what the initiate can learn. We eavesdrop on human relationships as they can form around Christ Jesus. This makes the Gospel of Matthew such a humanly accessible product. Through the Gospel of Matthew, we really get to know the man Jesus of Nazareth, the bearer of Christ. We learn everything he does by condescending to human nature. Yes, even the events in heaven are clothed in truly human relationships in the facts of the Gospel of Matthew.

How this is also the case for other circumstances, not only for those of initiation, will be discussed in the next and final lecture.